Meeting of the Parliament 18 February 2026 [Draft]
The Lord Advocate should know that early access to that information confers political advantage and is not standard practice. Today, former First Minister Jack McConnell said:
“The Lord Advocate is correct to remind ministers that they should not comment in a live case, but I cannot recall ever being briefed ahead of such a case on charges or timetable, and it would always have been particularly unacceptable for such information to be requested for a case where I had any connection to the accused.”
That is categoric and damning. How many other times in the Lord Advocate’s tenure has she seen fit to share with a First Minister that level of information on live court cases? Does she not accept that, in sending that information to the First Minister, she has compromised them both?