Meeting of the Parliament 29 January 2026 [Draft]
::I am proud to speak in this debate in whole-hearted and enthusiastic support of Mark Ruskell’s Greyhound Racing (Offences) (Scotland) Bill. I pay tribute to Mark for his tireless, compassionate and principled leadership on the issue. For years, he—as well as his beloved Bert—has stood alongside campaigners, charities and members of the public, all of whom have asked a simple question: why does a modern Scotland still permit the suffering of animals for entertainment?
The bill gives us a clear and humane answer. At its heart, this debate is not really about regulation or licensing schemes; it is about values. It is about whether we accept the torture, injury and premature death of gentle dogs as an acceptable price for gambling and spectacle—for what some might call fun and entertainment. I do not accept that, and I know that many members across the chamber do not accept it, either. Greyhounds are not disposable commodities; they are sensitive social animals that feel pain, fear and distress just as profoundly as any dog that shares our homes, yet the evidence is overwhelming that racing them at speed around oval tracks exposes them to inherent and unavoidable risks of serious injury and death. Broken legs, spinal injuries, head trauma and lifelong pain are not rare accidents.