Meeting of the Parliament 17 February 2026 [Draft]
I will be brief. I agree with Stephen Kerr that the bill is a bit of a dog’s breakfast. I approach the bill from the point of view of asking whether it will work legally, not from a religious point of view, and see two problems.
The bill creates a situation where a pupil can opt in to religious observance against their parents’ wishes but cannot opt out. That is a conflict. If we are serious about children’s rights, we must recognise that it is wrong to have that conflict in the bill. We also heard the argument, which is a valid one, that parents have rights, too, but the bill does not address those either.
The problem that I see, and the place where I agree with human rights campaigners, is that the bill will lead to legal challenges. I think that that will happen. If we end up with legal challenges, the Government might lose, which means that the bill is a bad one and we really ought to be doing better.
I will vote against the bill, basically because I do not think that it works. It is neither one thing nor the other. I think that Stephen Kerr is right. I do not see the point of the bill, because it seems to have got so much wrong. I will leave it there.