Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
13
Parties on record
2,355,091
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,355,091 contributions in session S6, 16 Apr 2026 – 16 May 2026. Latest 30 days: 148. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 14 May 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament 17 February 2026 [Draft]

17 Feb 2026 · S6 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Children (Withdrawal from Religious Education and Amendment of UNCRC Compatibility Duty) (Scotland) Bill
Adam, Karen SNP Banffshire and Buchan Coast Watch on SPTV

The bill is about children’s rights showing up in the real world—in the school day and in the decisions that adults make that can change how a young person experiences their education.

Parents have had a long-standing right to withdraw a child from religious observance. The bill will bring children’s rights into that reality in a way that schools can operate with. When a withdrawal request is received, the pupil must be told that the request has been made. The pupil has the right to object, and the school must take account of the pupil’s views with regard to their age and maturity.

I convened the lead committee that took evidence on the bill. To be clear, I am not speaking as convener today; however, I want to say that hearing the evidence made it clear how easy it is for children’s voices to be missed, although nobody intends harm. We also heard genuine concerns about family conflict and the position that teachers can possibly be put in.

For me, the answer is not to pretend that those concerns do not exist, and it is not to push the child to the side, either. The answer is to provide a clear process that puts the child’s views into the decision and then backs schools with guidance and consistency, so that nobody is left guessing.

I am genuinely pleased that, with the bill, we will have a clear separation between religious observance and religious and moral education, and that we will have removed the right to withdraw from RME, which is a measure that I advocated for. RME is education. It is one of the eight core curriculum areas, and it is delivered in an objective, critical and pluralistic manner. It helps pupils to learn about and from different religions and belief groups, and it helps them to explore ethical questions and values, which I think we can all agree is needed in our education systems now more than ever.

For the avoidance of doubt, nothing in the bill stops religious observance—it simply makes the decision making around it fairer. In the world that our young people are growing up in, with division being fed online every day and misinformation travelling faster than facts, it is more important than ever that we have the broad grounding provided by RME—not so that all young people think the same, but so that they can understand difference without fear and can disagree without dehumanising.

I welcome the stage 3 changes that have been agreed today that strengthen how that will work in practice, including provisions on guidance for schools, annual reporting on withdrawals from religious observance and a review after three years. That matters, because we should come back to the legislation with evidence and not just assumptions.

If the Parliament has agreed a consultative route to consider an independent right for a child or young person to request withdrawal from religious observance in future, I welcome that approach, because it allows proper consultation and scrutiny before any further change is made.

Part 2 of the bill, which is technical but important, amends the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (Incorporation) (Scotland) Act 2024 to place a duty on public authorities not to act incompatibly with UNCRC requirements when carrying out functions under acts of the Scottish Parliament. The bill limits that amendment so that, where a public authority is compelled to act in such a way by another act, it is not forced into an impossible choice that risks the continuity of an essential public service. There are also safeguards should such a question of exemption arise in legal proceedings, including notification to the Lord Advocate, the Children and Young People’s Commissioner Scotland and the Scottish Human Rights Commission.

The bill is not about taking away faith from anyone, and it is not about dismissing parents. It is about being honest that children have rights, too, and that schools should be a place where learning builds understanding, not barriers. The bill strengthens children’s rights, protects RME as education and gives schools a clearer footing. I will be pleased to vote for it.

19:34

In the same item of business

The Presiding Officer (Alison Johnstone) NPA
The next item of business is a debate on motion S6M-20813, in the name of Jenny Gilruth, on the Children (Withdrawal from Religious Education and Amendment o...
The Cabinet Secretary for Education and Skills (Jenny Gilruth) SNP
The legislation that comes before Parliament today does not sit in isolation; rather, as we have heard from some members this afternoon, it is part of the wi...
Miles Briggs (Lothian) (Con) Con
I thank the Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee for its work on the bill, those who have given evidence and the organisations that provided ...
Jenny Gilruth SNP
We have heard a variety of views on the matter during the discussions on amendments this afternoon, and I am sure that we will hear more in the debate. Howev...
Miles Briggs Con
The courts will have to judge whether the Government has overstepped the mark in the legislation, given the contradictory UNCRC and European human rights pro...
The Deputy First Minister and Cabinet Secretary for Economy and Gaelic (Kate Forbes) SNP
I wonder what the member thinks of a story that a constituent shared with me. She runs a Christian kids’ club in her local primary school. A little child was...
Miles Briggs Con
That is an individual case. Looking at how this will play out in the different scenarios that bureaucratic systems will look towards is very different.
Martin Whitfield Lab
Will the member take an intervention?
The Presiding Officer NPA
This will have to be very brief.
Martin Whitfield Lab
I am very grateful, Presiding Officer.The debate that we are having is about religious education and religious observance in a school setting, not about club...
Miles Briggs Con
The Deputy First Minister has pointed towards that club being held in a school, and I imagine that that is likely to be discouraged, given that scenario.I am...
Paul O’Kane (West Scotland) (Lab) Lab
As we have concluded the amendment stages of the bill, I join others in thanking the legislation team for their ever-present support with drafting amendments...
Maggie Chapman (North East Scotland) (Green) Green
I begin by thanking a number of people who have helped us get to this point today. As ever, the legislation team are unsung heroes, expertly drafting amendme...
Alex Cole-Hamilton (Edinburgh Western) (LD) LD
I remind members of my entry in the register of members’ interests. I am married to a Roman Catholic primary school teacher, and I was formerly the convener ...
The Presiding Officer NPA
We move to the open debate.19:30
Karen Adam (Banffshire and Buchan Coast) (SNP) SNP
The bill is about children’s rights showing up in the real world—in the school day and in the decisions that adults make that can change how a young person e...
Stephen Kerr (Central Scotland) (Con) Con
Well, I think that the bill is a mess. It has struggled its way through the different stages in this Parliament, and today’s stage 3 amendments were evidence...
Jenny Gilruth SNP
Will the member take an intervention?
Stephen Kerr Con
Yes, of course.
Jenny Gilruth SNP
The issues around conflict were discussed at length in the evidence sessions that were led by the Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee, and i...
Stephen Kerr Con
I do not doubt that conflict exists currently, but it exists within a very clear framework of law. The bill is not a clear framework of law.
Jenny Gilruth SNP
We will have to disagree on that.
Stephen Kerr Con
I think that we will—the cabinet secretary is correct.Of course children must be respected and they must be heard, but the Conservatives also recognise the f...
Graham Simpson (Central Scotland) (Reform) Reform
I will be brief. I agree with Stephen Kerr that the bill is a bit of a dog’s breakfast. I approach the bill from the point of view of asking whether it will ...
The Presiding Officer NPA
We move to the winding-up speeches.19:41
Maggie Chapman Green
As I indicated earlier, my closing remarks will focus on part 2 of the bill. I remain uncomfortable with that part of the bill. What is happening is that, ju...
The Deputy First Minister and Cabinet Secretary for Economy and Gaelic (Kate Forbes) SNP
I understand the member’s point. There has been quite a move in recent years to remove religious observance from school or to assume that to be secular is to...
Maggie Chapman Green
I am talking about part 2 of the bill, which is not about religious observance. However, on that point, we believe that there should be separation of church ...
Martin Whitfield (South Scotland) (Lab) Lab
I refer members to my entry in the register of members’ interests.I apologise to Karen Adam for having to step out during her speech. I will look it up, I as...
Roz McCall (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Con) Con
The debate has been thoughtful, and I thank members from all parties for their contributions. Everyone who spoke did so out of a genuine concern for children...