Meeting of the Parliament 17 February 2026 [Draft]
The point that I was making is one that I have discussed with SCES. There is an issue in relation to drafting. I would have preferred it if Mr O’Kane and I had been able to work together on an amendment on the issue, but, although he and I met and discussed the point, that was not the case in the end.
There is a risk here of creating confusion or of creating a false impression that modifications in the bill will, in some way, affect legislative provisions that they do not actually affect. The bill will not affect denominational education in the way that the member suggests. However, I appreciate Mr O’Kane’s point about the concern expressed by the sector, which is why I have spent a great deal of time engaging directly with the Catholic Education Service. We will come to this in a later group of amendments, but that is also why my officials have been engaging directly with SCES and with schools in relation to how the statutory guidance will be adopted and taken forward. All of that will be undertaken in conjunction with SCES and with the Catholic church more broadly, which is stipulated as a mandatory consultee.
I ask members to vote against all the other amendments in group 1, because although they are, as we have heard, well intentioned, they are unnecessary and likely to create confusion in our legislation.