Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
13
Parties on record
2,355,091
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,355,091 contributions in session S6, 16 Apr 2026 – 16 May 2026. Latest 30 days: 148. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 14 May 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament 22 January 2026 [Draft]

22 Jan 2026 · S6 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Digital Assets (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

The Digital Assets (Scotland) Bill is about the fast-changing world in which we live and the fact that our world is becoming a lot more digital. The bill will implement key recommendations made by the digital assets in Scots private law expert reference group, which was chaired by the Rt Hon Lord Hodge.

In 2023, the expert reference group reported to Scottish ministers that primary legislation was necessary to clarify the status of digital assets as objects of property in Scots law and for that legislation to set out basic provisions on how ownership of digital assets can be acquired. Legislation was deemed to be necessary because of a lack of substantive case law from the Scottish courts to provide the legal answers that are required on ownership of digital assets, and that remains the case. Emerging technologies and innovations, such as distributed ledger technologies, have given rise to those assets, which are not readily incorporated by existing classifications of property under Scots law.

The identified need for primary legislation has been supported by respondents to the Scottish Government’s public consultation, as well as by witnesses providing evidence to the Economy and Fair Work Committee. The bill addresses the current lack of clarity around the legal status of digital assets by providing a necessary legislative foundation in Scots law. Scots law will therefore be better equipped to accommodate the modern business practices that are already in existence in our country.

Digital assets are used for a wide range of purposes, from payments and investments to innovative financial products and services by businesses and individuals. With those assets becoming ever more integrated into our financial markets, providing greater legal certainty for those who choose to engage with them is becoming increasingly important. With estimates that the value of the blockchain technology market in Scotland is likely to reach £4.48 billion by 2030—to give one big example—the Scottish Government is focused on building an environment in which businesses can flourish, encourage innovation and help economic growth. It is not just businesses that embrace digital assets. The crypto asset market, which is the largest category of digital assets, is currently worth around £2.42 trillion.

We are already seeing increasing uptake of all that among the public. I was pretty astonished, as I am sure others were, including those on the committee, to learn that around 12 per cent of United Kingdom adults now hold crypto assets. That is around half a million adult Scots. It is therefore important to be clear at the outset that the bill has a deliberately narrow scope of application. It is a short piece of legislation with just nine sections that is restricted to clarifying that certain digital assets have property status in Scots law. It achieves that by confirming what is meant by a digital asset for the purposes of the bill; by categorising those digital assets as incorporeal moveable property; and by weaving how digital assets are acquired and transferred into well-established common-law rules—and, in doing so, reflecting existing commercial practices in relation to the acquisition and transfer of digital assets.

The bill includes a provision that will extend protections to good-faith acquirers who have obtained a digital asset in exchange for value from a person who, unbeknown to the good-faith acquirer, held a defective title to the asset.

I am aware that stakeholders identified other areas of law that could benefit from reform—areas where there is likely to be engagement with digital assets, such as diligence and insolvency. However, most stated that the bill was not the place to deliver any such reform; in any case, insolvency is largely a reserved matter. Ministers agree. We are of the view that, where further changes may be beneficial, it is appropriate for them to be developed and formed by consultation that is specific to the relevant devolved areas of law and by engagement with all key stakeholders in each area.

Although some may have wanted the bill to go further, I am aware of the view expressed during committee evidence sessions that consideration should be given to the exclusion of certain digital things from the application of the bill, such as electronic trade documents and voluntary carbon credits.

The Scottish Government will reflect on all the views that we hear today, as well as on the committee’s recommendations. Where appropriate, we will keep an open mind to amendments at stage 2, but we will see how, over the next few days, the issues develop in response to the debate. We are committed to working with Parliament and stakeholders to ensure that the legislation is effective and fit for purpose, and that it is as technologically neutral as possible, to help to keep it up to date and to keep pace with emerging innovations.

Overall, having listened to the stage 1 evidence and considered the committee’s stage 1 report, I am pleased that there is broad consensus on the approach that has been taken in the bill. I welcome the committee’s recommendation that Parliament agrees to the general principles of the bill.

Finally, I put on record my thanks to the expert reference group for its considerable work in analysing the legal landscape and formulating the recommendations for primary legislation. I thank the group’s chair, the Rt Hon Lord Hodge, and Professor Fox of the University of Edinburgh, for the time and effort that they gave to the group, the Scottish Government and everyone else with whom they interacted during the development of the bill. I also thank those who gave evidence to the Economy and Fair Work Committee, committee members, clerks and anyone else involved, for all their hard work in scrutinising the bill.

I move,

That the Parliament agrees to the general principles of the Digital Assets (Scotland) Bill.

In the same item of business

The Deputy Presiding Officer (Annabelle Ewing) SNP
The next item of business is a debate on motion S6M-20485, in the name of Richard Lochhead, on the Digital Assets (Scotland) Bill at stage 1. I invite member...
The Minister for Business and Employment (Richard Lochhead) SNP
The Digital Assets (Scotland) Bill is about the fast-changing world in which we live and the fact that our world is becoming a lot more digital. The bill wil...
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Annabelle Ewing) SNP
I call Daniel Johnson to speak on behalf of the Economy and Fair Work Committee. You have a generous six minutes.15:52
Daniel Johnson (Edinburgh Southern) (Lab) Lab
Thank you, Presiding Officer. I am delighted that we have such a packed chamber this afternoon to debate this important topic. I emphasise that it is importa...
Murdo Fraser (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Con) Con
I join the convener, whom we have just heard from, in thanking all those who gave evidence to the committee, the Scottish Parliament information centre for i...
Martin Whitfield (South Scotland) (Lab) Lab
In a sense, this casts us back to medieval England and the market overt, whereby, if somebody bought during the daytime with everyone watching them, they got...
Murdo Fraser Con
I am fascinated by Mr Whitfield’s reference to medieval England. Sadly, that did not form part of the committee’s evidence, but I am sure that the convener w...
Martin Whitfield (South Scotland) (Lab) Lab
It is a privilege to open the debate on behalf of Scottish Labour and to echo the previous speaker—we, too, will support the bill at stage 1.It is right that...
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Liam McArthur) LD
I detect a frisson of excitement in the chamber.16:13
Lorna Slater (Lothian) (Green) Green
The Digital Assets (Scotland) Bill is a narrow bill that will define the existence of digital assets in Scots law. It is clearly needed. Like it or not, digi...
Kevin Stewart (Aberdeen Central) (SNP) SNP
I thank everyone who has been involved in the scrutiny of the bill. Like the convener, I thank in particular the bill team—a very assiduous team, in my opini...
Willie Coffey (Kilmarnock and Irvine Valley) (SNP) SNP
I thought that I had seen the shortest bill in my time in Parliament when I saw the Community Wealth Building (Scotland) Bill, but this one is even shorter—i...
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Liam McArthur) LD
We now move to winding-up speeches.16:27
Lorna Slater Green
I would like to indicate my support for the Economy and Fair Work Committee’s stage 1 report, which notes the potential for digital technology to have wide-r...
Martin Whitfield Lab
I echo my thanks to all those who have been involved—including those who submitted evidence to the committee, those who support the committee and the Governm...
Stephen Kerr (Central Scotland) (Con) Con
This has actually been quite an enjoyable debate in many ways.
Murdo Fraser Con
Until now.
Stephen Kerr Con
I am being told that I have gone too far already.Daniel Johnson started off by warning us about the danger of going down rabbit holes, and then Martin Whitfi...
Martin Whitfield Lab
Made a request to intervene.
Daniel Johnson Lab
Made a request to intervene.
Stephen Kerr Con
Oh, a number of members wish to intervene. I am happy to give way to Martin Whitfield.
Martin Whitfield Lab
I will not give Stephen Kerr a tutorial, but I note that blockchain is referred to a lot and is used as a basis expectation. However, there are changes in te...
Stephen Kerr Con
That is cold comfort. Just when I thought that I was going to get a tutorial on blockchain, Martin Whitfield tells me that it is now out of date.Daniel Johns...
Daniel Johnson Lab
I suspect that Stephen Kerr might just be trying to fill his time by encouraging others to do it for him. However, I wonder whether he is demonstrating the n...
Stephen Kerr Con
I agree with Daniel Johnson on everything that he said, except for the bit when he said that I was inviting people to contribute in order to fill my time. I ...
Richard Lochhead SNP
I thank everyone who has contributed to the debate. I also repeat my thanks to the expert reference group for the work that it has undertaken to inform the d...
Daniel Johnson Lab
The point that was made by witnesses in relation to carbon credits—and I understand that that issue was provided as an example—was that there may well be thi...
Richard Lochhead SNP
Yes, we will look at that point and reflect on it.Other issues, such as electronic trade documents, were also mentioned, and some academics from the Universi...