Meeting of the Parliament 03 February 2026 [Draft]
I thank Ash Regan for her courage, and I thank her incredible team. I also thank the survivors of prostitution who shared their harrowing stories with MSPs. Today, we vote as a Parliament for the principles of this bill to put an end to state-sanctioned torture of women and girls. The bill responds to evidence of serious harm—evidence from women whose lives have been shaped by exploitation and violence.
I speak today as someone whose views on the issue have changed. When I lived in the Netherlands shortly after prostitution was legalised there, I accepted the argument that regulation would improve safety and reduce abuse. Brothels were licensed and standards enforced to protect those selling sex. However, over time, I saw the horrific outcomes as they became apparent. Sex tourism increased, more women were being violated, organised crime became entrenched and human trafficking got worse.
Today, in my own region, there are pop-up brothels in towns, women are trafficked and there are alarming indicators of exploitation. We know that there are links between prostitution, grooming gangs and serious organised crime. In 2025, a Romanian gang was convicted in Dundee for trafficking, rape and sexual abuse connected to prostitution—those are not isolated incidents. As we have heard today, the central issue is demand. As Pam Gosal outlined, prostitution exists because men are able to buy sex, and because women and girls are raped and abused. As long as that demand is left unchallenged, exploitation and harm will continue. The bill seeks to address that reality directly by shifting responsibility away from the abused to the abusers—those who create the demand and those who profit from it.
Voices have been raised about prostitution being driven underground, yet that is not borne out by evidence from countries such as Sweden. Traffickers and pimps depend on visibility and access. Their profits rely on men being able to purchase and abuse women easily. Reducing demand reduces the scale of harm and exploitation.
Ash Regan pointed out that sexual exploitation exists because those with the power choose not to act. Liam Kerr and Pam Gosal challenged the argument that was laid out that the Parliament does not have the time to discuss the issue. Liam Kerr and Pam Gosal gave example after example of when time was made available at the beginning of the day or at the end. I am not allowed to say that the Scottish Government was lying, but it was a misrepresentation of the truth.
I thank Ruth Maguire for her intervention on Maggie Chapman, because we were cringing at her speech. My colleague said that it was just offensive, but we cringed when we listened to Maggie Chapman eulogise sex work. Ruth Maguire asked whether, if it is the case that sex work is work, we should set up work experience. She showed how ridiculous Maggie Chapman was being.
Rona Mackay tried to intervene several times, and I say to her: violence from prostitution is not a myth.
Finlay Carson (Galloway and West Dumfries) (Con) rose—