Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
13
Parties on record
2,355,091
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,355,091 contributions in session S6, 16 Apr 2026 – 16 May 2026. Latest 30 days: 148. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 14 May 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament 03 February 2026 [Draft]

03 Feb 2026 · S6 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Desecration of War Memorials (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

I welcome that intervention from the cabinet secretary, and I agree. I am glad that we are having this discussion in the chamber today, where we are able to talk about it openly, and it will of course form part of the Official Report.

I again welcome the approach that the cabinet secretary has taken, and also the way in which we have discussed other ideas, such as extending our approach to cover different types of memorials and the review that he confirmed to me in a letter dated 26 January.

Although I remain absolutely committed to protecting war memorials and tackling the harm that is caused by desecration incidents, the Desecration of War Memorials (Scotland) Bill as drafted is not the most effective solution. Given the limited time that is left in this parliamentary session, and mindful that progressing the bill would require significant amendments, which have not been consulted on, I do not believe that it is right to push the bill to a vote today at stage 1. I do not want Parliament to be divided on what I believe is an important issue, especially when we are divided not necessarily on the principle but on the piece of proposed legislation that is before us.

I would much rather work with all parties to achieve the desired outcome. That is what our armed forces and veterans groups would expect from us, and I am keen to gather that consensus. I believe that, if the Scottish Government is true to its word and looks to legislate in this area—or if a Government of a different make-up chooses to legislate in this area—we could do something positive to reduce the number of attacks on our war memorials.

I will conclude by speaking directly to the armed forces and veterans groups who are the custodians of war memorials. Any attack on a war memorial, however large or small, is egregious, cruel, offensive and re-traumatising for everyone—for families who have lost a loved one in conflict and those who have served or are serving themselves.

The Desecration of War Memorials (Scotland) Bill might not be the answer today to prevent the mindless vandalism of war memorials across the country, but I will continue to work hard to ensure that better protections are put in place. The brave men and women whose names are etched into stone, who gave their lives for our freedom, deserve nothing less.

With that, Presiding Officer, I seek permission not to move the motion on the general principles of the bill. As soon as I return to my seat, I will write to the chief executive to withdraw my bill.

In the same item of business

The Deputy Presiding Officer (Annabelle Ewing) SNP
The next item of business is a debate on motion S6M-20628, in the name of Meghan Gallacher, on the Desecration of War Memorials (Scotland) Bill, at stage 1. ...
Meghan Gallacher (Central Scotland) (Con) Con
I begin by thanking everyone who supported the development of my member’s bill, particularly the staff of the non-Government bills unit for their exceptional...
The Cabinet Secretary for Constitution, External Affairs and Culture (Angus Robertson) SNP
rose—
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Annabelle Ewing) SNP
I ask you to resume your seat for a second, Ms Gallacher. I have a point of order from the Cabinet Secretary for Constitution, External Affairs and Culture, ...
Angus Robertson SNP
Sorry—I was actually seeking to make an intervention on Meghan Gallacher, if she will allow that at this stage.I commend Meghan Gallacher for pursuing this i...
Meghan Gallacher Con
I welcome that intervention from the cabinet secretary, and I agree. I am glad that we are having this discussion in the chamber today, where we are able to ...
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Annabelle Ewing) SNP
Thank you, Ms Gallacher. It is now time to move on to the next item of business.
Patrick Harvie (Glasgow) (Green) Green
On a point of order, Presiding Officer. I wish to raise an issue in relation to rule 9.6.4 of standing orders, which states that,“Once the lead committee has...
Douglas Lumsden (North East Scotland) (Con) Con
What a disgrace!
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Annabelle Ewing) SNP
Members.
Patrick Harvie Green
—but I have been—Interruption.
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Annabelle Ewing) SNP
Please resume your seat, Mr Harvie.Members, we will listen to the member who has the floor. That is Mr Harvie and not any member that I am currently looking ...
Patrick Harvie Green
Thank you, Presiding Officer. I am a member of what has been the lead committee on the bill. My time, the time of my staff, the time of other members and the...
Douglas Lumsden Con
What about the greyhounds?
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Annabelle Ewing) SNP
Members.
Patrick Harvie Green
—but in preparing for a debate that we expected to take place today and which is clearly not necessary. Even the member in charge now admits that the whole b...
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Annabelle Ewing) SNP
Members! Mr Harvie, will you please get to the point?
Patrick Harvie Green
In relation to the two parts of standing orders that I have raised, I ask whether the Presiding Officer is willing to begin a discussion with the Standards, ...
Meghan Gallacher Con
On a point of order, Presiding Officer.
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Annabelle Ewing) SNP
I will respond to Mr Harvie, obviously, before I take another point of order. That is the normal process.I thank Mr Harvie for advance notice of his point of...
Meghan Gallacher Con
I seek your guidance, Presiding Officer, because that was a disgusting and disgraceful intervention by Patrick Harvie. I have not wasted the Parliament’s tim...
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Annabelle Ewing) SNP
Ms Gallacher, will you please get to the point of order?
Meghan Gallacher Con
I will come to the point that I am trying to make. I have consulted the Presiding Officer’s office, I have been in contact with the Cabinet Secretary for Con...
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Annabelle Ewing) SNP
The matter was on the business bulletin and was called, and I think that that sets forth the position. The other points that Meghan Gallacher raised do not a...