Meeting of the Parliament 27 January 2026 [Draft]
I have moved on to amendment 63.
As I stated clearly during stage 2 when we considered an almost identical amendment, which was not agreed to by the Rural Affairs and Islands Committee, food production and nature restoration
“are inextricably linked and co-exist.”—[Official Report, Rural Affairs and Islands Committee, 19 November 2025; c 37.]
I was crystal clear that the Scottish Government has no policy of reducing livestock numbers. In stark contrast to other parts of the United Kingdom, we provide a range of support to our livestock producers.
In relation to amendment 64, the Rural Affairs and Islands Committee debated and rejected that exact amendment wording at stage 2, so I am not convinced that repeating the amendment today is the best use of anyone’s time. I reiterate the statement that I made at stage 2, which was that Mr Lumsden’s amendment
“falls outside the scope of statutory biodiversity targets for the purposes of conservation.”—[Official Report, Rural Affairs and Islands Committee, 19 November 2025; c 48.]
I hope that members will reject the amendment, as they did at stage 2.