Meeting of the Parliament 27 January 2026 [Draft]
The cabinet secretary said that the amendments are not necessary because their provisions are already covered in the bill. Condition and extent are covered as a target topic, but they are covered together. The bill refers to “condition or extent”, not condition and extent. That suggests that, when targets are set for a habitat, it will be either the condition or the extent that will be assessed. With my amendments, I aim to separate out those two distinct features of a habitat.
I think that it is the cabinet secretary’s intention to have targets for a habitat’s condition and its extent. That would ensure that we would avoid the example that I outlined when I spoke to my amendments, whereby there could be a habitat that improves in condition and declines in extent but still technically meets the target.