Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
13
Parties on record
2,355,091
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,355,091 contributions in session S6, 16 Apr 2026 – 16 May 2026. Latest 30 days: 148. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 14 May 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament 08 January 2026 [Draft]

08 Jan 2026 · S6 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Non-fatal Strangulation Laws and Intimate Partner Homicides

The next item of business is a members’ business debate on motion S6M-19504, in the name of Claire Baker, on non-fatal strangulation laws and intimate partner homicides. The debate will be concluded without any question being put. I invite members who wish to speak in the debate to press their request-to-speak buttons.

Motion debated,

That the Parliament notes the calls for legislation to create a standalone offence of non-fatal strangulation (NFS), in light of new research led by Professors Sonia Oreffice and Climent Quintana-Domeque at the University of Exeter on intimate partner homicides and NFS; understands that this is the first known study to examine the impact of standalone NFS laws on intimate partner homicides across multiple jurisdictions internationally; notes that the study finds that, in US jurisdictions where NFS has been criminalised as a standalone serious offence, intimate partner homicides fell by double-digit percentages, with female-victim homicides declining by around 14% and male-victim homicides by 27%, and estimates that more than 1,500 lives have been saved since the adoption of such laws; expresses concern regarding the view that these reductions could highlight a significant gap in Scots law; understands that criminalising NFS could be considered as a potential approach to reduce the deadliest consequences of intimate partner violence; further understands that NFS often leaves no visible injuries, yet is a strong predictor of future lethal violence, and that, in the absence of a standalone offence, NFS may go unrecorded or be prosecuted only as minor assault due to the absence of visible injuries or a weapon; notes with alarm the scale and salience of violence against women and girls in Scotland, including in the Mid Scotland and Fife region; considers that standalone NFS laws could disrupt any escalation of violence and coercive control and help prevent lethal outcomes and wider harms, and commends the research team for its ongoing work in this area.

12:49  
References in this contribution

Motions, questions or amendments mentioned by their reference code.

In the same item of business

The Deputy Presiding Officer (Annabelle Ewing) SNP
The next item of business is a members’ business debate on motion S6M-19504, in the name of Claire Baker, on non-fatal strangulation laws and intimate partne...
Claire Baker (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Lab) Lab
I thank the members who signed my motion so that it could be debated in the chamber. I particularly thank Tess White and Michelle Thomson, whom I have worked...
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
We move to the open debate. 12:56
Michelle Thomson (Falkirk East) (SNP) SNP
I, too, thank Claire Baker for her work in this matter and for obtaining the debate, and I accord my own respects to the power of collaborative cross-party w...
Tess White (North East Scotland) (Con) Con
I want to say a special thank you to Claire Baker for raising this topic and to Michelle Thomson for working on it over the past few years. Emily Drouet was...
Carol Mochan (South Scotland) (Lab) Lab
I thank Claire Baker for bringing this important debate to the chamber, and I thank all those who have contributed so far. I associate myself with the remark...
Liam Kerr (North East Scotland) (Con) Con
Emily Drouet was a law student at the University of Aberdeen. She was kind, compassionate, intelligent and thoughtful. Emily died in 2016 when an incident oc...
Pauline McNeill (Glasgow) (Lab) Lab
I thank Claire Baker for securing the debate and bringing the matter to the Parliament. I endorse her view that the work that Tess White and Michelle Thomson...
Monica Lennon (Central Scotland) (Lab) Lab
I thank Claire Baker for securing this important debate and I thank all colleagues for their contributions—in particular, Tess White and Michelle Thomson, wh...
The Cabinet Secretary for Justice and Home Affairs (Angela Constance) SNP
I thank Claire Baker for bringing the important issue of non-fatal strangulation to the Parliament today. Over the past few years, I have had the opportunity...
Tess White Con
I hear what the cabinet secretary says, and I am glad that she referred to the work of the Criminal Justice Committee. However, has she reviewed the committe...
Angela Constance SNP
I am aware of that evidence. Claire Baker, in her opening remarks, spoke about the importance of us all engaging with the evidence. Later in my remarks, I w...
Monica Lennon Lab
Will the cabinet secretary take an intervention?
Angela Constance SNP
Of course—briefly, thank you.
Monica Lennon Lab
I am grateful to the cabinet secretary for taking my intervention before she moves on to the next point. I appreciate the efforts that are being made, and th...
Angela Constance SNP
Ms Lennon raises an important point. The work that goes on in schools around the equally safe strategy and the curriculum input on healthy relationships—whic...
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
Cabinet secretary, I appreciate that there is a lot of information to impart on what is a very important matter, but you have gone considerably over your time.
Angela Constance SNP
Forgive me.
Liam Kerr Con
Is there time for the cabinet secretary to take an intervention?
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
I am afraid that there is no time for interventions because we are running fairly late.
Angela Constance SNP
I agree with the motion’s sentiment that non-fatal strangulation should not go unrecorded, and I have spoken in detail about the consultation. My final piece...
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
That concludes the debate. 13:36 Meeting suspended. 14:30 On resuming—