Public Audit Committee 17 December 2025
You are right, convener. These are significant amounts of public expenditure, and there was a real difference with what the person was earning while they were a permanent employee of the Scottish Government. I think that that is the rationale for why we think that it deserved public reporting, as the change was of such magnitude. As we set out in the report, we do not think that the approval arrangements were strong enough within the Scottish Government for sufficient oversight and monitoring of the arrangement.
We had discussions with the Scottish Government, and it was of the view that the arrangements did represent value for money. Although the specialist skills that the person brought may have augmented the position in relation to potentially significant penalties that the Scottish Government might have incurred, we do not think that that is a strong enough justification. As Richard Smith says, we think that clear evidence of either director general or even ministerial oversight of such an arrangement is needed.