Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
13
Parties on record
2,355,091
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,355,091 contributions in session S6, 16 Apr 2026 – 16 May 2026. Latest 30 days: 148. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 14 May 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament 07 January 2026

07 Jan 2026 · S6 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Income Tax
Hoy, Craig Con South Scotland Watch on SPTV

I wish you a happy new year, Deputy Presiding Officer.

This year, 2026, must be the year in which Scotland’s politicians tackle the cost of living crisis. People across Scotland are under pressure, and many families are struggling to get by. Their bills are rising and everyday costs keep going up. In a matter of weeks, after years of Scottish National Party tax rises and wasteful spending, voters will face a clear choice. The SNP and Labour want people to keep paying more through higher taxes and they want to increase the benefits bill. Reform joins them in wanting to increase Scotland’s soaring social security bill. All of that adds to the pressure on hard-working Scottish families.

However, there is a different way—a commonsense way that focuses on bringing bills down and making work pay. It is an approach that focuses on widening the tax base and not hitting the same people harder each and every year. That is what our motion sets out to do. At its core is the same call that we made in relation to last year’s budget. We are calling for income tax on lower and middle-income workers to be cut by scrapping the Scottish basic and intermediate rates of income tax and replacing them with a single Scottish income tax rate—a flat 19 per cent rate on earnings up to the higher-rate threshold of £44,000.

However, we need to go much further than that to deal with the damaging effects of fiscal drag. In her first budget, Rachel Reeves said that freezing tax thresholds would hurt working people, but, barely 12 months later, she froze them for three years, following in the footsteps of the Scottish National Party.

Today, we propose to reverse that, to lift thresholds in line with inflation and to use a new zero rate to increase the point at which Scots start paying income tax, not just this year but in each of the five years of the next parliamentary session. I will tell members why we must do so. If the thresholds remain at their present levels, most Scottish workers will be paying the higher rate of tax by the end of the decade. A tax that is meant for high earners will be paid by workers on average incomes. Under Labour and the SNP, there will be higher-rate tax for the many, not the few. That is the reality of the SNP’s fiscal policy, which is, of course, aided and abetted by Scottish Labour.

We are talking about the pernicious effects of prolonged fiscal drag, which raises taxes on hundreds of thousands of Scots through the back door. Worse still, those stealth tax raids involve taking money from pay packets to fund billions in extra welfare spending. The benefits bill is set to reach £10 billion by the end of the decade.

When I met Mr McKee and the Cabinet Secretary for Finance and Local Government, Shona Robison rightly asked how we would pay for our proposals. Let me tell the minister how we would do it. In cutting waste in Government, we would go further than the £1 billion that Mr McKee has allegedly identified. We would cut the benefits bill while ensuring that those who are in genuine need would continue to secure proper support. We will set out specifically which benefits we would scale back once we hear from the Scottish Government in next week’s budget, when we will discover just how much more the cabinet secretary is set to snatch from working households to blow on Benefits Street.

Let me be clear to workers and businesses. In recent years, the SNP has made the decision to increase taxes to pay for ever more benefits. It has the cheek to say that those tax increases fall on those with the broadest shoulders, when we all know that teachers and nurses are paying more. As my colleague Russell Findlay said this week, the Government is not asking workers to pay—it is demanding that they do so. They have no choice in the matter. They cannot just turn around and say, “Sorry, Shona—I’ll skip paying your higher taxes this year.” It is a non-negotiable one-way street to ever more tax to pay for ever more welfare.

However, it does not have to be that way, because reducing benefits incentivises work. It puts more money into people’s pockets and generates more in tax receipts, which, in turn, delivers more economic growth.

Before I close, I will return to the frankly laughable SNP amendment that has been put before MSPs today, which says that the Government must

“respect Parliament by outlining its tax policy”

only when it publishes its budget next week. Let us reflect on that SNP culture of respect for this Parliament. What respect did it show when core details of last year’s budget somehow found their way into the mainstream media before Shona Robison had even got to her feet? What respect did it show to this Parliament when, in 2022, Nicola Sturgeon’s vitally important Covid update was reported by the press long before it was announced to Parliament, which the Presiding Officer said was “disappointing” and “disrespectful”?

Just this week, what respect did the Government show to this Parliament when media reports suggested that the Cabinet Secretary for Justice and Home Affairs was safe in her role even before the findings of an official probe had been published? It showed it absolutely no respect whatsoever, so let us take no lectures from a party that repeatedly treats this Parliament and the Scottish people with utter contempt.

The measures in our motion would go a considerable way to closing the corrosive tax differential with the rest of the United Kingdom. They would save average full-time workers more than £600 this year and, by raising thresholds by £1,300 by 2030-31, they would grow the tax base and deliver growth. They prove that the Scottish Conservatives are the only party that is serious about cutting tax and cutting waste, the only party that is serious about cutting the SNP’s bloated benefits bill and the only party that is committed to a fairer deal for Scottish workers.

I move,

That the Parliament calls on the Scottish Government to reduce income tax on working people in Scotland; commits to uprating income tax thresholds in line with inflation in the forthcoming Scottish Budget and in future Scottish Budgets; further commits to removing the Scottish basic rate and intermediate rate of income tax and replacing them with a single Scottish income tax rate of 19 pence on income up to the higher rate threshold, and believes that these fairer measures would begin to reduce the tax differential with the rest of the United Kingdom, put more money into the pockets of working families, and support economic growth by addressing the cumulative effects of current income tax policy.

15:00  

In the same item of business

The Deputy Presiding Officer (Annabelle Ewing) SNP
The next item of business is a debate on motion S6M-20294, in the name of Craig Hoy, on lowering bills for Scotland’s workers. I invite those members who wis...
Craig Hoy (South Scotland) (Con) Con
I wish you a happy new year, Deputy Presiding Officer. This year, 2026, must be the year in which Scotland’s politicians tackle the cost of living crisis. P...
The Minister for Public Finance (Ivan McKee) SNP
Let me begin with a point of consensus. We all want to ease the pressure on household budgets. Across Scotland, people are still feeling the strain of the co...
Craig Hoy Con
If we come forward with fully costed proposals to meet the cost of our tax cuts, will the minister come forward with fully costed proposals to find the £10 b...
Ivan McKee SNP
If the member read the work that we have already published—the fiscal sustainability delivery plan and the medium-term financial strategy—he would find that ...
Liz Smith (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Con) Con
Will the minister take an intervention?
Ivan McKee SNP
I will if I have time.
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
There is no extra time available.
Ivan McKee SNP
I am sorry, but I need to make some progress. Our approach is fair. We ask those with the broadest shoulders to contribute a little more so that families an...
Michael Marra (North East Scotland) (Lab) Lab
A happy new year to you, Presiding Officer. People are feeling the burden of higher prices and of wages that barely increased in the 14 years of the Tories....
Liz Smith Con
Will the member give way?
Michael Marra Lab
Not yet, as I am just beginning. Six interest rate cuts have brought the average cost of a mortgage down by £1,500. The average wage is up by £1,800, as the...
Liz Smith Con
I entirely agree with what Michael Marra has just said, but where does Labour stand when it comes to the huge burden of the national insurance tax on employe...
Michael Marra Lab
When it comes to the amount of money that has been invested in public services, the UK Labour Government inherited not just an economy that had flatlined for...
Craig Hoy Con
Will Mr Marra give way?
Michael Marra Lab
No thank you, sir. The public are more likely to accept paying a bit more in tax if they can see improvements in public services. One has to come with the o...
Patrick Harvie (Glasgow) (Green) Green
I always welcome the chance to debate the tax system and how to make it fairer, and I am proud of the Green record in achieving that. Our 2016 manifesto prop...
Jamie Greene (West Scotland) (LD) LD
I agree with the notion that our current politics is defined by the cost of living and by people’s perception of whether their Government or Governments are ...
Ivan McKee SNP
Will the member take an intervention?
Jamie Greene LD
I have less than a minute; otherwise I would have done so. Of course, we need to raise earnings across the board, because raised earnings will inevitably le...
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
We move to the open debate, with speeches of up to four minutes. 15:17
Alexander Stewart (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Con) Con
I am pleased to speak in favour of our motion, which calls for lower bills for workers, who are suffering as a result of the cost of living crisis, and for a...
Ivan McKee SNP
Will the member take an intervention on that point?
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
The member is in his last minute.
Alexander Stewart Con
I am in my last minute. I want Scotland’s tax system to support growth, reward work and deliver lower bills for Scottish workers. As we have already heard, ...
Jamie Hepburn (Cumbernauld and Kilsyth) (SNP) SNP
I am happy to contribute to today’s debate. The last time that I took part in a Tory debate, Mr Hoy happened to be closing it. He said that my speech was one...
Douglas Ross (Highlands and Islands) (Con) Con
On a point of order, Presiding Officer. Jamie Hepburn has just said that more than half of taxpayers in Scotland pay less income tax than is paid elsewhere...
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
Mr Ross will be aware that that is not a point of order. It is up to members to determine in what way they seek to contribute—Interruption. I say to members ...
Meghan Gallacher (Central Scotland) (Con) Con
The Parliament is designed to stand up for working people in Scotland. However, since the SNP took office, working people have been told—not asked, but told—...
Ivan McKee SNP
That is the whole point: tax pays for those free things, which people would not get if we did what the Conservative Party wants us to do and reduced tax rates.