Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee 18 December 2025
I have a final question. You mentioned the distinction between de jure and de facto referenda. The English legal system has a principle called stare decisis, which essentially means to look at previous decisions as setting precedents. The system is very strongly based on that principle, which, incidentally, is not the same in Scotland. Do you think that that principle, and the fact that we had an agreed referendum back in 2014, adds to what seems to many people, although not to everyone, to be an overwhelming argument for the Scottish people having the right to decide?
We have done that once before—it was agreed in the past. It is now at least 11 years since that happened and none of the reasons for not doing it again stack up. Does that create another mandate for a Scottish Parliament in which the majority of people support independence? If the English principle of stare decisis is being followed, surely that should lead to the same sort of agreement.