Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
14
Parties on record
2,095,827
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,095,827 contributions in session S6, 11 May 2026 – 10 Jun 2026. Latest 30 days: 2,655. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 09 Jun 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament 18 December 2025

18 Dec 2025 · S6 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Fishing and Coastal Communities

I congratulate my colleague Alasdair Allan on securing this debate and standing up for his constituents.

Six months ago, Scotland’s fishing industry found itself being sold out, yet again, by a UK Government, this time under Labour. To soften the blow of conceding fishing access to European trawlers for a further 12 years under its EU reset deal, Labour announced a £360 million fishing and coastal growth fund to

“modernise Britain’s fishing fleet, deliver new training and skills to back the next generation of fishers and promote the seafood sector to export our high-quality produce across the world.”

Labour committed to working with the industry

“to target investment where it matters most.”

A casual observer might have thought that a fishing fund would have been targeted where the most significant fishing takes place and at the local communities that are involved in that activity. That was certainly the case under the previous European maritime and fisheries fund, under which Scotland received approximately 46 per cent of the UK’s total funding.

However, to the horror of Scotland’s coastal communities and the acquiescence of Labour parliamentarians, only one of whom is here in the chamber today, minister of state Angela Eagle MP confirmed that Scotland would receive a paltry allocation of less than 8 per cent, despite the fact that Scottish vessels account for 70 per cent of total UK landings, 63 per cent of the total value of fish landed and 40 per cent of the fishermen. Shetland alone lands more fish than England, Wales and Northern Ireland combined.

The reaction from fishermen has been fierce. Sheila Keith, executive officer of the Shetland Fishermen’s Association, said:

“This allocation is not just inadequate—it’s a betrayal of Scotland’s fishing communities ... we’ve been handed a dismal fraction of the support we need to modernise and sustain our industry.”

Elspeth Macdonald, chief executive of the Scottish Fishermen’s Federation, said:

“This has gone from being a consolation prize to now being a booby prize. It’s hard to feel that this”

UK

“government cares one jot about the Scottish fishing industry. Sold out by the Prime Minister through the EU re-set, told that we would have this fund to help support the industry for the future, only now to find that Scotland’s share is close to derisory.”

Faced with such a staggering injustice and betrayal of his constituents perpetrated by his own Government, Western Isles Labour MP Torcuil Crichton said:

“There is a question of fairness in the geographical distribution of the fund, and the Minister should consider that; I hope the funding will be reviewed in due course”.—[Official Report, House of Commons, 23 October 2025; Vol 773, c 1112.]

Stirring stuff indeed there from Mr Crichton. One wonders what Torcuil Crichton the journalist would have made of such a meek response had it come from his predecessor, or any Scottish National Party or, indeed, Tory MP.

The approach of the Labour Government, sadly echoed by members on the Labour front bench in this Parliament, has been to deflect, buck pass and blame those who had the temerity to call for funding to be devolved. Time and again, Ms Eagle said the Barnett formula had to be applied, and if we did not like it, we should find the money from devolved budgets.

This is desperate stuff. There is no legal or constitutional requirement that sector-specific funding be allocated according to Barnett. Whether it was the previous UK Government short-changing the Scottish Government of expected Barnett consequentials when it rolled out the levelling up fund to communities around the UK, or Theresa May’s deal with the Democratic Unionist Party for £1 billion to Northern Ireland, there is a whole catalogue of examples to the contrary. This is a political decision by Labour that sees it value a fisherman in England more than 14 times more than a colleague in Peterhead, Lerwick, Stornoway or Ayrshire.

Labour is not the first UK Government to demonstrate that it does not understand, value or care about the Scottish fishing industry; sadly, I doubt that it will be the last. The Labour Government should, as a matter of urgency, reform the allocations to deliver a fair and equitable outcome for Scotland’s fishermen.

This episode demonstrates yet again that, for Westminster, fishing will always be an afterthought at best. The only way that we can secure the long-term future of this vital Scottish industry is through the full powers of an independent country.

In the same item of business

The Deputy Presiding Officer (Liam McArthur) LD
The final item of business is a members’ business debate on motion S6M-19427, in the name of Alasdair Allan, on fairer funding allocation for Scotland’s fish...
Alasdair Allan (Na h-Eileanan an Iar) (SNP) SNP
I am grateful for the opportunity to bring to the chamber an issue that matters to every fishing community in Scotland. It certainly matters to people in my ...
Stephen Kerr (Central Scotland) (Con) Con
I note that Dr Allan referenced a lack of vocalised response to the apportionment of the support funds that he has identified. I want to make it absolutely c...
Alasdair Allan SNP
I am happy for Andrew Bowie’s words to be on the record and to accept what Stephen Kerr says about his stance and his party’s stance on the issue. In conclu...
The Deputy Presiding Officer LD
We move to the open debate. I call Tim Eagle.
Stephen Kerr Con
Hear, hear. 14:19
Tim Eagle (Highlands and Islands) (Con) Con
I thank my colleague Stephen Kerr. This is the season of good will, so I want to end on a happy note, although, sadly, I have one negative point that I will...
The Minister for Agriculture and Connectivity (Jim Fairlie) SNP
Does the member accept that there are unprecedented pressures on the processing sector right now and that the decision has been taken in order to protect the...
Tim Eagle Con
I accept that the processors have made some comments on the issue, but I have had other stakeholders on the phone today, who have told me, “I can’t believe t...
Kenneth Gibson (Cunninghame North) (SNP) SNP
I congratulate my colleague Alasdair Allan on securing this debate and standing up for his constituents. Six months ago, Scotland’s fishing industry found i...
The Deputy Presiding Officer LD
I advise Mr Gibson and other members that we have members online who are participating in the debate. I call one of them now—Karen Adam. 14:27
Karen Adam (Banffshire and Buchan Coast) (SNP) SNP
I am grateful to Alasdair Allan and congratulate him on bringing the debate to the chamber. The unfairness that his motion describes is felt from the Western...
Rhoda Grant (Highlands and Islands) (Lab) Lab
The SNP continues to complain about the fishing and coastal growth fund allocation, but it was devolved at the SNP’s request. It knew that devolved funding c...
Emma Harper (South Scotland) (SNP) SNP
I support Dr Allan’s motion. I want to highlight the impact that the UK Government’s choice of allocation for the UK EU coastal growth fund has had on our sm...
Alasdair Allan SNP
Does the member agree that some of what we have heard from members in previous speeches has been truly extraordinary in its attempts to blame Scotland for ha...
Emma Harper SNP
Absolutely. The twisting of the information is just a distraction from what is happening: the money is going predominantly to English fishermen when most of ...
The Deputy Presiding Officer LD
I call Jim Fairlie to respond to the debate. 14:37
The Minister for Agriculture and Connectivity (Jim Fairlie) SNP
I thank Alasdair Allan very much for lodging the motion for debate, and I thank members for giving their views on this important issue. I am heartened by the...
Stephen Kerr Con
I think, however, that the minister ought to address the issues that Rhoda Grant raised. Can he confirm that, when the Scottish Government asked for the fund...
The Deputy Presiding Officer LD
I can give you the time back, minister.
Jim Fairlie SNP
Patience, Mr Kerr. Tim Eagle said that we were “better off under the Tories”. Well, I can hardly say that that was the case, given the fact that the Tory Go...
Martin Whitfield (South Scotland) (Lab) Lab
Will the minster give way?
Jim Fairlie SNP
I will take the member’s point in a second. I tried to talk to Dame Angela Eagle about this very point in an interministerial group meeting, but it was utte...
Martin Whitfield Lab
I am grateful to the minister for taking this intervention and for his kind compliments on my attending the debate—which is interesting in itself. Is what Rh...
The Deputy Presiding Officer LD
Always speak through the chair.
Jim Fairlie SNP
I say to Mr Whitfield what I said to Mr Kerr: patience. The decision is insulting to our vital fishing industry and coastal communities, and it demonstrates...
Stephen Kerr Con
Will the minister give way again?
Jim Fairlie SNP
Not at this time. On our engagement with the UK Government ahead of its announcement about the fund, we were clear that we expected the funding approach to ...
Stephen Kerr Con
Will the minister give way?
Jim Fairlie SNP
No, I will not. Make no mistake: the decision was made in London, and it treats Scotland as an afterthought. Since the UK Government made its announcement...