Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
14
Parties on record
2,095,827
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,095,827 contributions in session S6, 11 May 2026 – 10 Jun 2026. Latest 30 days: 2,655. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 09 Jun 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Committee

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee 26 November 2025

26 Nov 2025 · S6 · Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Item of business
Continued Petitions
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (Implementation in Scots Law) (PE2135)
Ewing, Fergus Ind Inverness and Nairn Watch on SPTV

Convener, I was pleased that you made reference to the fact that, sadly, Henry Black Ferguson, the petitioner, has passed away. It is fitting that I say a few additional words.

Mr Ferguson was an accountant who went to work in the Bahamas and was the chief executive officer of an airline company, but he never lost his love for Scotland, and his commitment to the cause of independence for Scotland was absolute. He was the co-convener of Respect Scottish Sovereignty, and he pursued the petition doggedly—along with many others, some of whom, I should acknowledge, are in touch with me—attracting 7,500 signatures, which is a significant number.

At its heart, the petition is about the principle that is set out in article 1 of the covenant, which Ewan Kennedy quotes in his submission:

“All peoples have the right of self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.”

12:00  

I hope that we would all support and endorse that principle in its entirety. However, the implementation of it in Scots law has become ensnared—a matter of principle has become ensnared—in an entirely technical issue; namely, interpretation of the Scotland Act 1998. I am no expert, but I understand the argument that section 30 of the Scotland Act 1998 allows matters to be devolved. That, in turn, requires the permission of the UK Government, which is the superior Parliament in the devolution arrangement. In short, that is where we stand.

This is an argument that a cause that will never die will continue until it is successfully achieved. I pay tribute to Mr Ferguson and all the petitioners, but we are plainly not going to get any further with the petition in this parliamentary session. Although we might have a dream, we are also pragmatists, and that dream will not be achieved in the immediate future. However, thanks to Mr Ferguson’s and others’ dogged pursuit of the cause, we shall prevail one day, if I may be permitted to make that assertion.

In the same item of business