Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
13
Parties on record
2,355,091
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,355,091 contributions in session S6, 16 Apr 2026 – 16 May 2026. Latest 30 days: 148. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 14 May 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament 26 November 2025

26 Nov 2025 · S6 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Business Motions

Yesterday’s responses to my urgent question on grooming gangs were nothing short of a farce. Once again, the Cabinet Secretary for Justice and Home Affairs passed responsibility on to a junior minister to answer questions on her behalf while she sat in the chamber avoiding any scrutiny.

At a time when Scotland desperately needs leadership on grooming gangs, this Government offers only evasion and silence. Victims are being failed while ministers sit on their hands. I raise the unprecedented intervention by the NSPCC, which has made it clear that Scotland has no real understanding of the true scale or nature of grooming gangs operating in our country. That is an alarming admission from our leading child protection charity.

The Cabinet Secretary for Justice and Home Affairs claimed that the national child sexual abuse and exploitation sub-group addresses grooming gangs, but its 27-page report does not mention grooming gangs once. Therefore, I ask again: who is investigating grooming gangs in Scotland? It is certainly not this Government.

The cabinet secretary told me that it is for me and others to present a case for an inquiry. The evidence is already overwhelming. The NSPCC has said that the scale of grooming gang activity is unknown. More victims are coming forward every day with harrowing, life-changing testimony. Families are being torn apart by some of the most appalling crimes imaginable. What more evidence does the cabinet secretary need?

Victims do not need a Government that is merely open to an inquiry; they need a Government that is willing to initiate one, to listen to victims, to act and to confront the failures that have allowed those crimes to continue unchecked. Leadership is not about sitting on the fence. Leadership is about stepping up and doing what is right.

A grooming gangs inquiry is not optional; it is essential. It is the only way to uncover the scale of the problem, to protect children and to ensure that victims’ voices are finally heard and believed. I take no pleasure whatsoever in raising these issues. However, until this Government stops ducking responsibility, I will continue to speak up for the victims who have been ignored for far too long, even if that means that I need to return to the chamber to raise the issue every sitting day.

In the same item of business

The Presiding Officer (Alison Johnstone) NPA
The next item of business is consideration of business motion S6M-19921, in the name of Graeme Dey, on behalf of the Parliamentary Bureau, setting out a busi...
Meghan Gallacher (Central Scotland) (Con) Con
Yesterday’s responses to my urgent question on grooming gangs were nothing short of a farce. Once again, the Cabinet Secretary for Justice and Home Affairs p...
Pauline McNeill (Glasgow) (Lab) Lab
I, too, had concerns about the fact that the cabinet secretary was not here to answer what has now become a really important national question. The member an...
Meghan Gallacher Con
That is exactly why I am here this evening: because there is a frustration. We cannot get answers. We cannot seem to find any mechanism afforded to MSPs that...
The Presiding Officer NPA
I call the minister to respond on behalf of the Parliamentary Bureau. 18:24
The Minister for Parliamentary Business and Veterans (Graeme Dey) SNP
I will respond from the perspective of responding to a call for a statement, as I believe was intended, which was covered in the latter part of Meghan Gallac...
Meghan Gallacher Con
Will the minister take an intervention?
Graeme Dey SNP
I want to make some progress, because I think that I will answer the member’s question. The answer on 19 November clarified the position regarding Professor ...
Pauline McNeill Lab
Made a request to intervene.
The Presiding Officer NPA
Minister, can I confirm that you were about to take the intervention from Ms McNeill?
Graeme Dey SNP
Sorry, I was not aware of the intervention. I am happy to take it.
Pauline McNeill Lab
I want to draw the minister’s attention to the question that I have now asked twice. It is a serious question. An apology has been made because Professor Jay...
Graeme Dey SNP
I will write to Pauline McNeill, having looked into that matter for her.
The Presiding Officer NPA
I clarify for members that this item of business is about members wishing to change forthcoming items of business. That should be the focus. The question is...
The Presiding Officer NPA
There will be a division. There will be a short suspension to allow members to access the digital voting system. 18:28 Meeting suspended. 18:30 On resuming—
The Presiding Officer NPA
We come to the vote on motion S6M-19921, in the name of Graeme Dey, on behalf of the Parliamentary Bureau, setting out a business programme. Members should c...
The Presiding Officer NPA
The result of the division on motion S6M-19921, in the name of Graeme Dey, is: For 92, Against 26, Abstentions 0. Motion agreed to, That the Parliament agr...
The Presiding Officer NPA
The next item of business is consideration of business motions S6M-19922 and S6M-19923, on stage 1 timetables for bills, and S6M-19924, on a stage 2 timetabl...