Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
14
Parties on record
2,095,827
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,095,827 contributions in session S6, 11 May 2026 – 10 Jun 2026. Latest 30 days: 2,655. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 09 Jun 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament 26 November 2025

26 Nov 2025 · S6 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Non-Domestic Rates (Liability for Unoccupied Properties) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

I will make a wee bit more progress, before perhaps giving way to the member later.

As members know, the Scottish Parliament voted in 2020 to devolve empty property relief to local authorities in order to provide greater local fiscal empowerment for councils by letting them, rather than Scottish Government, decide whether to offer any rates discounts to the owners of unoccupied properties.

To do that, a Government amendment at stage 2 of the Non-Domestic Rates (Scotland) Bill in 2019, approved on a cross-party basis at committee, repealed legislation from 1966 that provided that no rates were payable on unoccupied properties, and also repealed a power that allowed ministers to prescribe by regulation classes of unoccupied property for which such rates were payable.

Empty property relief was devolved on 1 April 2023 and local authorities were given £105 million of additional revenue funding each year, equal to the forecast cost of that relief before it was devolved. Councils, which are accountable to their local electorate, have full flexibility over how they deploy those extra resources locally.

However, a technical error in the Non-Domestic Rates (Scotland) Act 2020 was recently identified that means that the amendments did not have the intended legal effect. Although section 19(2) of the 2020 act repealed section 24 of the Local Government (Scotland) Act 1966, which stated that no rates were payable for unoccupied non-domestic property, the effect of section 16(1) of the Valuation and Rating (Scotland) Act 1956, which sets out that rates shall by payable by occupiers only, was regrettably not taken into account.

In the interest of transparency, I can inform members that a routine inquiry about the basis for rates to be charged to the owner of unoccupied properties was received from a council by Scottish Government officials on 23 June. There was no indication at that time of the implications of the query and it was treated as routine.

In investigating the issue, it became apparent to Scottish Government officials that there might have been an error in the 2020 legislation. Initial concerns were notified to ministers on 21 August, and that concern, following further investigation and legal advice, was confirmed to ministers on 19 September.

In the same item of business

The Deputy Presiding Officer (Liam McArthur) LD
The next item of business is a debate on motion S6M-19891, in the name of Ivan McKee, on the Non-Domestic Rates (Liability for Unoccupied Properties) (Scotla...
The Minister for Public Finance (Ivan McKee) SNP
We are in the chamber today to debate stage 1 of a bill that seeks to correct a legislative error and ensure that there is a clear legal basis for local auth...
Craig Hoy (South Scotland) (Con) Con
Will the minister give way?
Ivan McKee SNP
I will make a wee bit more progress, before perhaps giving way to the member later. As members know, the Scottish Parliament voted in 2020 to devolve empty ...
Jeremy Balfour (Lothian) (Ind) Ind
Will the minister give way?
Craig Hoy Con
Will the minister give way?
Ivan McKee SNP
Ministers agreed that the introduction of legislation be explored, and officials have worked at pace to develop the bill and secure a parliamentary slot sinc...
Craig Hoy Con
The minister has, in part, answered my question about the party that has challenged the legislation. Since 23 June, have further parties come forward? Is he ...
Ivan McKee SNP
No other party has come forward on the issue, because it was not known about. Only one council has come forward. I do not know whether I want to give the nam...
Pam Duncan-Glancy (Glasgow) (Lab) Lab
Will the minister give way?
Martin Whitfield (South Scotland) (Lab) Lab
Will the minister give way?
Ivan McKee SNP
I have finished with that question, so I will take Martin Whitfield.
Martin Whitfield Lab
I seek further clarification of the situation. Will the minister confirm that what he described as a “routine” request was one that was created internally wi...
Ivan McKee SNP
I would need to check back on the detail on that. As far as the Scottish Government is concerned, the request came from a council, and its council officials ...
Pam Duncan-Glancy Lab
Given the dates that are involved and the slight confusion around that, is the minister willing to publish all internal correspondence about the error and th...
Ivan McKee SNP
In the interests of transparency, we are absolutely willing to co-operate with any requirements in that regard. Is that everyone?
Jeremy Balfour Ind
I seek clarification. When did the Scottish Government decide that legislation would have to be brought to the Parliament? On what date was that decision mad...
The Deputy Presiding Officer LD
Minister, I can give you the time back for the intervention.
Ivan McKee SNP
Thank you. As I indicated in my earlier remarks, initial concerns were notified to ministers on 21 August. That is the first date that ministers were aware...
Mark Griffin (Central Scotland) (Lab) Lab
Will the minister give way?
The Deputy Presiding Officer LD
He may do so very briefly.
Mark Griffin Lab
I have a technical question to assist my understanding. I understand the position as to the non-domestic rates that have been paid despite there being no leg...
Ivan McKee SNP
I can provide clarification on any specific example that Mark Griffin wants clarification on. In simple terms, everything would continue as if the legislatio...
Craig Hoy (South Scotland) (Con) Con
The Scottish Conservatives have very real concerns about the emergency bill—concerns about how we got here, the legality of the measures and that, today, two...
John Mason (Glasgow Shettleston) (Ind) Ind
The member emphasises that businesses have had to pay the rates, but where would the £400 million come from? Would he support cutting it from local authorities?
Craig Hoy Con
Mr McKee has managed to magic up £1 billion in public sector reforms in the blink of an eye, so I am sure that he could find another £400 million. The damag...
Mark Griffin (Central Scotland) (Lab) Lab
On the face of it, this emergency bill is a short and simple bill, designed to rectify an error in the Non-Domestic Rates (Scotland) Act 2020. As the law sta...
Liam Kerr (North East Scotland) (Con) Con
I am curious. The member says that the Labour Party will support the bill. Does he not have any concerns about the legal issues raised earlier by my colleagu...
Mark Griffin Lab
I do have concerns about the legal issues. However, as the Presiding Officer said, all legislation that is passed in this place will ultimately face the scru...
The Deputy Presiding Officer LD
I call Lorna Slater. You have up to four minutes, Ms Slater. 17:45