Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
13
Parties on record
2,355,091
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,355,091 contributions in session S6, 16 Apr 2026 – 16 May 2026. Latest 30 days: 148. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 14 May 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament 26 November 2025

26 Nov 2025 · S6 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Oil and Gas
Lumsden, Douglas Con North East Scotland Watch on SPTV

Does the SNP no longer have any idea what should be in the plan, or does it fear the backlash when people realise what is in it? I agree with Mr Carson—I think that it is both.

The SNP does not want to be honest with offshore workers on its position on oil and gas. It does not want to be honest with our rural communities about the impact that the scale of expensive renewables will have on our countryside, whether that is monster pylons, battery storage or substations. It does not want to be honest with our fishermen about the impact that offshore wind will have on fishing grounds, nor does it want to be honest with households about the true cost of renewables and their impact on bills. Instead of the cabinet secretary jetting off around the world, she should meet communities and hear people’s concerns.

Scotland is blessed with one of the most highly regulated, low-carbon oil and gas basins in the world. The North Sea is not the problem; it is part of the solution. The public agree: 84 per cent of Scots support continuing domestic oil and gas production during the transition. Therefore, the Parliament must send a clear message today: that it does not support the SNP’s presumption against new oil and gas, it does not support Labour’s punitive energy profits levy and it stands with Scotland’s workers, Scotland’s energy security and Scotland’s economy.

This country needs a transition that is built on realism, not ideology. The SNP refuses to give clear support to the industry and Labour says that our future is not in oil and gas. However, we say plainly that Scotland needs its domestic oil and gas industry, it needs energy security and it needs a fair and affordable path to net zero. That begins with backing our own workers, our own resources and our own future. I urge colleagues across the chamber to back my motion.

I move,

That the Parliament regrets the Scottish Government’s ideological drive to end North Sea oil and gas exploration and production; notes the negative impact on oil and gas jobs, energy security, the economy and the environment of the Scottish Government’s failure to pursue an informed, data-led, evidence-based North Sea policy; demands the immediate and unequivocal reversal of the Scottish Government’s presumption against new oil and gas exploration and production, and calls on the UK Government to immediately abolish the Energy Profits Levy.

15:01  

In the same item of business

The Deputy Presiding Officer (Liam McArthur) LD
The next item of business is a debate on motion S6M-19894, in the name of Douglas Lumsden, on backing oil and gas. I invite members wishing to participate in...
Douglas Lumsden (North East Scotland) (Con) Con
Today is a really dark day for the oil and gas industry and for the north-east of Scotland. We have seen headline after headline in The Press and Journal thi...
Fergus Ewing (Inverness and Nairn) (Ind) Ind
Does Mr Lumsden agree that we should take a leaf out of Norway’s book, given that Equinor has just announced plans to drill 250 new wells, invest $5.9 billio...
Douglas Lumsden Con
I could not agree more with Mr Ewing. The sad fact is that not only is Norway producing more, it is actually selling to us. Norway is producing oil and gas f...
Finlay Carson (Galloway and West Dumfries) (Con) Con
Both.
Douglas Lumsden Con
Does the SNP no longer have any idea what should be in the plan, or does it fear the backlash when people realise what is in it? I agree with Mr Carson—I thi...
The Cabinet Secretary for Climate Action and Energy (Gillian Martin) SNP
The Parliament debated oil and gas policy just two weeks ago, and we now return to that policy in the light of significant United Kingdom Government announce...
Douglas Lumsden Con
The environmental compatibility report for Rosebank has been available for some weeks now. Does the SNP Government back Rosebank—yes or no?
Gillian Martin SNP
It is getting a bit tiresome explaining the Scotland Act 1998, the Electricity Act 1989 and all the reserved functions of the UK Government to the Conservati...
Fergus Ewing Ind
Will the minister give way?
Gillian Martin SNP
I will come to Fergus Ewing in a second, after I make this point. Communities are being affected not just in the north-east but across Scotland. Donna Hutch...
Fergus Ewing Ind
Would the way to avert those job losses not be to preserve and create the 1,000 jobs that would come from Cambo and Rosebank? Equinor’s analysis is that 12 ...
Gillian Martin SNP
I will use the short time that I have to make one point to Fergus Ewing. I am fully in favour of electrification of production platforms. The decrease in pro...
The Deputy Presiding Officer LD
You need to conclude.
Gillian Martin SNP
It is simply a tax on the industrial workers and communities of Scotland. I am appalled that it has not been scrapped. There is one more thing to say before...
The Deputy Presiding Officer LD
Can we please make sure that we can hear the person who has the floor? A bit of response and reaction to what is being said is one thing, but barracking in t...
Sarah Boyack (Lothian) (Lab) Lab
I am pleased to open the debate for Scottish Labour. Today’s debate should have been an opportunity for Parliament to come together and set out a clear, cred...
Douglas Lumsden Con
Will the member take an intervention?
Sarah Boyack Lab
No, thank you.
Douglas Lumsden Con
It is not about political theatre; it is about—
Sarah Boyack Lab
No, thank you. I had four minutes, and now I have less time than that. There has been a complete absence of SNP strategic leadership. Let me be clear from t...
Kevin Stewart (Aberdeen Central) (SNP) SNP
Will the member give way?
Sarah Boyack Lab
No, thank you. I just want to be clear on this topic—it is a short debate. Scotland’s huge renewables potential must be unlocked by maximising the opportuni...
Patrick Harvie (Glasgow) (Green) Green
The green voting sheet for this afternoon’s debate was not difficult to fill out. Very obviously, we will oppose the motion. The Scottish Conservatives are h...
Craig Hoy (South Scotland) (Con) Con
Will Mr Harvie take an intervention?
Patrick Harvie Green
No. I do not have time. My real worry at the moment is that the Tory and Labour position—the new antagonism to any kind of credible climate policy—not only ...
Willie Rennie (North East Fife) (LD) LD
In what was quite a unique collaboration, Offshore Energies UK and Scottish Renewables joined forces recently and called for the energy profits levy to be sc...
Gillian Martin SNP
Does Willie Rennie agree that decommissioning has not been mentioned enough in the debate? Much of the activity that the supply chain and workers would have ...
Willie Rennie LD
For years, we have talked about a just transition, and we now have it—live—in front of us but lacking a joined-up approach. Last night, I was at the Mossmorr...
Fergus Ewing Ind
Will the member give way?