Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
13
Parties on record
2,355,091
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,355,091 contributions in session S6, 17 Apr 2026 – 17 May 2026. Latest 30 days: 148. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 14 May 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament 25 November 2025

25 Nov 2025 · S6 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Non-Domestic Rates (Liability for Unoccupied Properties) (Scotland) Bill
Hoy, Craig Con South Scotland Watch on SPTV

I am going to hold the minister and the Government to account, and I am going to ask for more transparency and scrutiny so that the Government does not repeat the mistake that it is presently trying to fix.

Having messed up once already, the Government is now seeking permission from the Parliament to rush through a piece of legislation to cover a mistake that is entirely of its own making. As Opposition MSPs, we do not have an army of civil servants at our disposal to produce amendments at short notice and, unlike the SNP Government, we do not have dozens of spin doctors to create a smokescreen. We need time to scrutinise the bill. The SNP Government published it only yesterday, but it wants it to be passed in two days.

The SNP is using the distraction of the UK budget as a smokescreen to cover for its own incompetence. Worse still, it is trying to fix rushed legislation with rushed legislation. Given the Scottish Government’s track record, we believe that there should be much more scrutiny of the bill, because how do we know that it will not make the situation worse?

John Swinney’s Government wants to pass an emergency law to keep £400 million that it took from businesses but was not legally entitled to take. I recognise that what has happened creates financial pressures—pressures that the Scottish Government has brought on itself through its incompetence—and those pressures could add to the pressures that are already felt by local government.

Let me ask the Government a few questions. It might want to respond to them in writing or find a means to respond to them today. Given that we are being asked to pass emergency legislation, will the Government confirm that it has taken sound legal advice on the competence of the bill? If so, is it watertight? What is the Scottish Government’s assessment of the likely success of any legal challenge that might be initiated against the new legislation? My understanding from speaking to stakeholders today is that several property owners are giving active consideration to such legal challenges. Most important, does the minister think that it is right for businesses and Scotland’s councils to pay the price for the SNP’s incompetence?

For those reasons, we cannot support the use of emergency powers. Even if the motion is agreed to, we cannot support the timetable for the bill, which is the direct result of SNP incompetence. That reflects the fact that we need significantly more scrutiny and transparency in relation not just to this SNP bill but to its general dealings with the Parliament.

16:43  

In the same item of business

The Deputy Presiding Officer (Annabelle Ewing) SNP
The next item of business is a debate on motion S6M-19890, in the name of Graeme Dey, on the Non-Domestic Rates (Liability for Unoccupied Properties) (Scotla...
The Minister for Parliamentary Business and Veterans (Graeme Dey) SNP
In 2020, the Scottish Parliament voted to devolve empty property relief to local authorities to provide greater local fiscal empowerment to councils. That ca...
Douglas Ross (Highlands and Islands) (Con) Con
The minister said that the error was “recently identified”. Can he tell us how recently?
Graeme Dey SNP
I am more than happy to do that. In August—
Douglas Ross Con
August?
Graeme Dey SNP
If the member would allow me to explain—
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
Minister, please resume your seat for a second. We are not proceeding like this. We are going to hear the person who has the floor, and then we are going t...
Graeme Dey SNP
Thank you, Presiding Officer. As I said, in August of this year, a query was raised with the Scottish Government. That was investigated and, in mid-Septembe...
Douglas Ross Con
I do not think that it is rapid. People outside this building would not think that a Government finding out about a major flaw in its own legislation in the ...
Graeme Dey SNP
This is a serious matter. It would be a matter of regret for the Parliament to have the process clouded by conspiracy theories of the type that Mr Ross is se...
Graham Simpson (Central Scotland) (Reform) Reform
Will the minister take an intervention?
Craig Hoy (South Scotland) (Con) Con
Will the minister give way?
Graeme Dey SNP
I will give way one final time, to Mr Simpson—my apologies, Mr Hoy.
Graham Simpson Reform
Can the minister say who raised the query with the Scottish Government?
Graeme Dey SNP
I am not in possession of the exact detail. What I can say is that a local authority raised the query with the Scottish Government. That is the detail that I...
Craig Hoy (South Scotland) (Con) Con
The Government is asking us to set aside concerns about transparency, legitimacy and competence, and we should not be prepared to do so when such a significa...
John Mason (Glasgow Shettleston) (Ind) Ind
Would the member accept that he is somewhat overegging this? Everyone makes slight administrative mistakes, and this is not a major issue.
Craig Hoy Con
Mr Mason might have left the party, but he is still an apologist for the Administration. We are talking about £400 million being taken from struggling busine...
Graeme Dey SNP
I have listened with interest to Craig Hoy’s comments, but I have a question for him. Given the significant sums of money involved, what will his party do? W...
Craig Hoy Con
I am going to hold the minister and the Government to account, and I am going to ask for more transparency and scrutiny so that the Government does not repea...
Martin Whitfield (South Scotland) (Lab) Lab
Today, we are being invited to agree to treat the Non-Domestic Rates (Liability for Unoccupied Properties) (Scotland) Bill as an emergency bill and to consid...
Craig Hoy Con
Does Mr Whitfield have any suggestions about why the Government has chosen to introduce the bill this week of all weeks?
Martin Whitfield Lab
I am grateful for the intervention, but that lies outside my knowledge. At the simplest level, we are just trying to restore Parliament’s original intention....
Douglas Ross Con
Martin Whitfield is rightly speaking about the interpretation of the proposed legislation. Where has that interpretation been between August, when the Govern...
Martin Whitfield Lab
There needs to be absolute transparency and understanding—and not necessarily for any party-political reasons. There needs to be an understandable, honest na...
Lorna Slater (Lothian) (Green) Green
I do not intend to use my full time. The Scottish Greens understand the need for the bill and the proposed timetable, and will support the motion this evening.
The Presiding Officer NPA
I call Graeme Dey to wind up. You have up to four minutes, minister. 16:48
Graeme Dey SNP
I will be equally concise. I call on members to support the motion to bring the law, as quickly as possible, fully into alignment with the position as intend...
Craig Hoy Con
Will the minister take an intervention?
Graeme Dey SNP
We must maintain the credibility of the tax and protect public finances, and the bill will do that by clarifying the legislative position as quickly as possi...