Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
14
Parties on record
2,095,827
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,095,827 contributions in session S6, 11 May 2026 – 10 Jun 2026. Latest 30 days: 3,026. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 10 Jun 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament 11 November 2025

11 Nov 2025 · S6 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Offshore Energy Workforce (Energy Transition Institute Reports)
Ewing, Fergus Ind Inverness and Nairn Watch on SPTV

In congratulating Liam Kerr for bringing the debate to the chamber, it is a matter of sadness and shame that the Scottish Government has not arranged a full day’s debate on our energy situation in Scotland. I hope that the minister will comment on that.

Perhaps the world’s foremost energy expert is Daniel Yergin, who won a Pulitzer prize for his book on the oil industry, “The Prize: the Epic Quest for Oil Money and Power”. He remarked that the transition from wood to coal took 200 years and the transition from coal to oil took 100 years, from the discovery in Pennsylvania in 1859 to the 1960s, when oil overtook coal as the most widely used fuel.

My point is that transitions take a long time. It takes a long time for things to be done. My God, I was even once told by a rather rueful director of transport at Highland Council that it took five years to build a lay-by. How do we think that we are going to transform everything in Britain, which gets three quarters of its energy needs from oil and gas, by 2030—or by 2045, as the Scottish Government says? It is for the birds.

I worked closely with Paul de Leeuw when I was energy minister, and I regard him as a friend. I have a great deal of admiration for his work and the work of his project director. However, I wonder whether even the lowest scenario of the three scenarios that he sets out on hydrogen, carbon and wind is over-optimistic—I cannot go into the details, because I do not have the time. What I see at the moment is the disengagement of investment from offshore wind. There are troubled times ahead. That is what I am hearing, for various reasons. I am sure that the minister will be aware of that.

Let us look at our oil and gas industry in Britain. North Sea production is among the cleanest in the world. The Greens are not in the chamber—that is a shame, because there is always a possibility that one can learn things in life, even from the most unlikely quarters—but if they were here, they would hear this: the emissions from North Sea production have fallen by 34 per cent since 2018. That is a reduction of one-third in just six years, which is a tremendous achievement. The average is 21kg of CO2 per barrel, which can be compared with fracking gas in the USA, which produces 76kg of emissions; and the level for Qatar is about the same.

Our total emissions from production are a quarter of those elsewhere. Surely a true Green—like myself, for example—would welcome that. I am not against roads or cars—I am against emissions. I am not against oil and gas production in the world—I am against the dirtiest oil and gas production in the world. I cannot help but try to apply logic to problems, and if we apply logic, we see that the world should surely be moving to try to encourage everywhere to replicate the level of emissions reduction that the UK has achieved. We should take the lead—incidentally, there is a lot of money to be made in that, too.

In our daily lives, we rely on oil and gas for everything. The protesters who glued themselves to Pall Mall were using a petrochemical product. The protesters who despoiled a Van Gogh painting by throwing paint at it were using an oil and gas product—I do not know if they knew that. My partner, who is an anaesthetist, uses anaesthetics every day, and just about every anaesthetic drug is a by-product of oil and gas. Do the Greens want us to go back to the days of chloroform and the gag and—without wanting to be grisly—amputation by the saw? That is what they are asking us to do, with the primitive, crude, illogical approach that they take.

Why can we, in Britain, not do what I think that the majority of people in Scotland and south of the border want us to do, which is to support our oil and gas industry, which is the best in the world? For five years, I had a ringside seat and I saw that for myself, all over the world. I saw that our engineers were respected as the best in the world. Let us value them and praise them. As Gary Smith said,

“Oil and gas is not the enemy”.

It is part of the future, along with our renewables.

17:02  

In the same item of business

The Deputy Presiding Officer (Annabelle Ewing) SNP
The next item of business is a members’ business debate on motion S6M-18800, in the name of Liam Kerr, on the insights of the “Striking the Balance” reports ...
Liam Kerr (North East Scotland) (Con) Con
I am grateful to cross-party colleagues for their support for this debate. Signing a motion in Parliament does not necessarily mean agreement with it. Rather...
Fergus Ewing (Inverness and Nairn) (Ind) Ind
Does Mr Kerr agree that the real tragedy of those prospective job losses—which are on a scale that is greater than in the 1980s, when we saw the closure of R...
Liam Kerr Con
Fergus Ewing is absolutely right, and I could not agree more because the “Striking the Balance” report justifies exactly what we have just heard. The report...
Audrey Nicoll (Aberdeen South and North Kincardine) (SNP) SNP
I thank Liam Kerr for lodging his motion, which I am happy to support. I commend Professor Paul de Leeuw and the team at the Energy Transition Institute at R...
Liam Kerr Con
I am enjoying the member’s contribution. Does she agree that what is needed is for both Scotland’s Governments to come out with a genuine, holistic strategy ...
Audrey Nicoll SNP
I will come on to policy, which is often overlooked but is absolutely crucial. In addition, the recently published UK Government “Clean Energy Jobs Plan” ha...
Douglas Lumsden (North East Scotland) (Con) Con
I congratulate Liam Kerr on the debate and on his contribution. I welcome the publication of the RGU Energy Transition Institute’s latest report. It is a se...
Sarah Boyack (Lothian) (Lab) Lab
I, too, thank Liam Kerr for bringing this important debate to the chamber, as we need to think through the insights that come from the “Striking the Balance”...
Stephen Kerr (Central Scotland) (Con) Con
Will Sarah Boyack give way?
Sarah Boyack Lab
No—I am going to keep moving. I wish to raise a point that was first raised by Audrey Nicoll. It is vital that we recognise the role of trade unions, and o...
Douglas Lumsden Con
Speaking of the trade unions, there was once a “no ban without a plan” campaign. Is that something that Labour supports, or has it abandoned that like it has...
Sarah Boyack Lab
That is the point, and that is what comes through in the report. We need to work with the trade unions now because, as change accelerates, they need to be at...
Liam Kerr Con
Will the member give way?
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
Ms Boyack is concluding her speech.
Sarah Boyack Lab
It is about turbines, cables and platforms being made here in Scotland, so that people are trained here and communities benefit. We need to plan ahead and wo...
Fergus Ewing (Inverness and Nairn) (Ind) Ind
In congratulating Liam Kerr for bringing the debate to the chamber, it is a matter of sadness and shame that the Scottish Government has not arranged a full ...
Kevin Stewart (Aberdeen Central) (SNP) SNP
I congratulate Liam Kerr on securing the debate and on his very logical contribution. I thank Professor Paul de Leeuw and Sumin Kim of the Robert Gordon Univ...
Sarah Boyack Lab
Does Kevin Stewart have any idea when the Scottish Government’s energy and just transition plan will appear? We have been waiting for it for more than two an...
Kevin Stewart SNP
The most important thing is to recognise that these matters are reserved. The UK Labour Government is in the driving seat, because energy is a policy area th...
Stephen Kerr (Central Scotland) (Con) Con
To be frank, I find it a bit rich listening to Kevin Stewart go on in the way that he has done. I have sat in this Parliament, as the rest of us have. I say ...
Kevin Stewart SNP
I repeat what I said at the very beginning of my contribution, about Mr Kerr’s logical contribution. Mr Kerr and I, among others, were involved in a debate o...
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
Thank you, Mr Stewart—that was a long intervention.
Stephen Kerr Con
That is all very good from Kevin Stewart, but, unfortunately, some of us have a longer-term memory of what the SNP has been up to over the past four and a ha...
Clare Adamson (Motherwell and Wishaw) (SNP) SNP
Does Mr Kerr listen to “The Life Scientific” on BBC Radio 4? It had a prominent climate expert, Pierre Friedlingstein, on today, who explained that this is n...
Stephen Kerr Con
We will not do that at the price of tens of thousands of jobs, or at the price of making our country poorer. No parliamentarian here should be arguing for th...
The Minister for Higher and Further Education (Ben Macpherson) SNP
I thank colleagues for what has been a good and important debate with an honest exchange of views and insights. I also pay tribute to Liam Kerr for bringing ...
Douglas Lumsden Con
I completely understand that most energy policy is reserved, but the Scottish Government published the draft energy strategy and just transition plan two and...
Ben Macpherson SNP
I refer the member to the answer that was given on that point just last week in the chamber, I think. I am glad that the member raised that issue. I say thi...
Liam Kerr Con
Will the minister give way?