Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
14
Parties on record
2,095,827
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,095,827 contributions in session S6, 12 May 2026 – 11 Jun 2026. Latest 30 days: 3,026. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 10 Jun 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament 11 November 2025

11 Nov 2025 · S6 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Offshore Energy Workforce (Energy Transition Institute Reports)
Kerr, Liam Con North East Scotland Watch on SPTV

I am grateful to cross-party colleagues for their support for this debate. Signing a motion in Parliament does not necessarily mean agreement with it. Rather, it shows a willingness to debate, to listen and to test arguments that may not accord with one’s own views, and any debate on oil and gas can often polarise views. I am somewhat appalled that members of the Green party, so recently a party of Government and one that has called a debate on oil and gas for tomorrow, have not only refused to sign my motion, which I carefully drafted to avoid being divisive, but have not bothered even to attend to hear arguments that might challenge their ideology.

This debate is not about ideology; it is about the evidence contained in the “Striking a Balance” report from the Energy Transition Institute at Robert Gordon University. That is not a lobbying document or a press release; it is a rigorous, data-driven assessment of the future of the United Kingdom’s offshore energy workforce, and its conclusions should give every member pause for reflection.

The report warns that, without urgent co-ordinated action, the UK’s oil and gas workforce could shrink by around 400 jobs every fortnight for the next five years, which is the equivalent of losing the entire Grangemouth workforce every two weeks. It also warns that, if Scotland’s Government fails to pursue renewable energy at scale while continuing to let oil and gas decline, almost 30,000 direct employment offshore industry jobs could be lost by the early 2030s.

Those are not just numbers on a spreadsheet: they are people, families, mortgages and communities, especially in North East Scotland where one in every six people works directly or indirectly in oil and gas—a figure that is one in every 30 people across the entirety of Scotland.

On the economic point, I was told last week that Shell alone contributes £12 billion to the UK’s gross domestic product and accounts for 78,000 jobs, which means that this is not only an energy issue but an economic and social one.

In the same item of business

The Deputy Presiding Officer (Annabelle Ewing) SNP
The next item of business is a members’ business debate on motion S6M-18800, in the name of Liam Kerr, on the insights of the “Striking the Balance” reports ...
Liam Kerr (North East Scotland) (Con) Con
I am grateful to cross-party colleagues for their support for this debate. Signing a motion in Parliament does not necessarily mean agreement with it. Rather...
Fergus Ewing (Inverness and Nairn) (Ind) Ind
Does Mr Kerr agree that the real tragedy of those prospective job losses—which are on a scale that is greater than in the 1980s, when we saw the closure of R...
Liam Kerr Con
Fergus Ewing is absolutely right, and I could not agree more because the “Striking the Balance” report justifies exactly what we have just heard. The report...
Audrey Nicoll (Aberdeen South and North Kincardine) (SNP) SNP
I thank Liam Kerr for lodging his motion, which I am happy to support. I commend Professor Paul de Leeuw and the team at the Energy Transition Institute at R...
Liam Kerr Con
I am enjoying the member’s contribution. Does she agree that what is needed is for both Scotland’s Governments to come out with a genuine, holistic strategy ...
Audrey Nicoll SNP
I will come on to policy, which is often overlooked but is absolutely crucial. In addition, the recently published UK Government “Clean Energy Jobs Plan” ha...
Douglas Lumsden (North East Scotland) (Con) Con
I congratulate Liam Kerr on the debate and on his contribution. I welcome the publication of the RGU Energy Transition Institute’s latest report. It is a se...
Sarah Boyack (Lothian) (Lab) Lab
I, too, thank Liam Kerr for bringing this important debate to the chamber, as we need to think through the insights that come from the “Striking the Balance”...
Stephen Kerr (Central Scotland) (Con) Con
Will Sarah Boyack give way?
Sarah Boyack Lab
No—I am going to keep moving. I wish to raise a point that was first raised by Audrey Nicoll. It is vital that we recognise the role of trade unions, and o...
Douglas Lumsden Con
Speaking of the trade unions, there was once a “no ban without a plan” campaign. Is that something that Labour supports, or has it abandoned that like it has...
Sarah Boyack Lab
That is the point, and that is what comes through in the report. We need to work with the trade unions now because, as change accelerates, they need to be at...
Liam Kerr Con
Will the member give way?
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
Ms Boyack is concluding her speech.
Sarah Boyack Lab
It is about turbines, cables and platforms being made here in Scotland, so that people are trained here and communities benefit. We need to plan ahead and wo...
Fergus Ewing (Inverness and Nairn) (Ind) Ind
In congratulating Liam Kerr for bringing the debate to the chamber, it is a matter of sadness and shame that the Scottish Government has not arranged a full ...
Kevin Stewart (Aberdeen Central) (SNP) SNP
I congratulate Liam Kerr on securing the debate and on his very logical contribution. I thank Professor Paul de Leeuw and Sumin Kim of the Robert Gordon Univ...
Sarah Boyack Lab
Does Kevin Stewart have any idea when the Scottish Government’s energy and just transition plan will appear? We have been waiting for it for more than two an...
Kevin Stewart SNP
The most important thing is to recognise that these matters are reserved. The UK Labour Government is in the driving seat, because energy is a policy area th...
Stephen Kerr (Central Scotland) (Con) Con
To be frank, I find it a bit rich listening to Kevin Stewart go on in the way that he has done. I have sat in this Parliament, as the rest of us have. I say ...
Kevin Stewart SNP
I repeat what I said at the very beginning of my contribution, about Mr Kerr’s logical contribution. Mr Kerr and I, among others, were involved in a debate o...
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
Thank you, Mr Stewart—that was a long intervention.
Stephen Kerr Con
That is all very good from Kevin Stewart, but, unfortunately, some of us have a longer-term memory of what the SNP has been up to over the past four and a ha...
Clare Adamson (Motherwell and Wishaw) (SNP) SNP
Does Mr Kerr listen to “The Life Scientific” on BBC Radio 4? It had a prominent climate expert, Pierre Friedlingstein, on today, who explained that this is n...
Stephen Kerr Con
We will not do that at the price of tens of thousands of jobs, or at the price of making our country poorer. No parliamentarian here should be arguing for th...
The Minister for Higher and Further Education (Ben Macpherson) SNP
I thank colleagues for what has been a good and important debate with an honest exchange of views and insights. I also pay tribute to Liam Kerr for bringing ...
Douglas Lumsden Con
I completely understand that most energy policy is reserved, but the Scottish Government published the draft energy strategy and just transition plan two and...
Ben Macpherson SNP
I refer the member to the answer that was given on that point just last week in the chamber, I think. I am glad that the member raised that issue. I say thi...
Liam Kerr Con
Will the minister give way?