Meeting of the Parliament 28 October 2025 [Draft]
I am interested in the points raised in Mark Ruskell’s amendments in relation to the Scottish outdoor access code. As he will well know, I have been trying to get that code reviewed for the past five years, which the Government has steadfastly refused to do—on what basis, I do not know. My view is that it is 20 years old and it probably needs updating. I am not sure that I could have supported Mark Ruskell’s amendments, if he had decided to move them, so I am glad that he is not going to.
In relation to Mr Torrance’s amendment 232, what slightly concerns me is how one asserts a right of access. Some rights of access will be asserted because they have been taken with consent, with payment, or as a fact of law. I am not sure whether those grounds would still stand under his amendment, but I understand what he is trying to do. Bearing in mind what the local MSPs are saying, I will follow their lead on whether it is a good one, once we have heard from the cabinet secretary. However, I am worried that amendment 232 is a bit wide ranging and does not define where access lies and how one goes about asserting rights.