Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
13
Parties on record
2,355,091
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,355,091 contributions in session S6, 17 Apr 2026 – 17 May 2026. Latest 30 days: 148. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 14 May 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament 24 June 2025 [Draft]

24 Jun 2025 · S6 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Education (Scotland) Bill: Stage 3

In the interests of brevity, I will try to speed up my comments during the rest of the afternoon.

I was pleased to lodge this suite of amendments following stage 2. Amendments 5, 1 and 76, in my name, would improve the bill.

Amendment 5 would require qualifications Scotland to prepare and publish guidance to support those with educational support needs in undertaking examinations. Amendment 5 would introduce the term “educational support needs” into the bill instead of “additional support needs”, because it is important that children, young people and adult learners with support needs for learning are all covered by these and other provisions in the bill.

15:30  

Amendment 76 would ensure that that newly introduced term covers existing legislation for children and young people, along with other learners with additional support needs for learning. Amendment 76 is a definition of “educational support needs”. It deliberately uses a new term but defines it as having the same meaning as “additional support needs” under the Education (Additional Support for Learning) (Scotland) Act 2004 and “support needs” under the Further and Higher Education (Scotland) Act 2005. That is because it might be confusing to start using those terms to mean something broader in this bill when they are already well understood and have a meaning in their respective contexts.

Amendment 1 would therefore reflect the new terminology in existing provisions in relation to section 3, quality assuring the processes that additional establishments have to put in place to support the assessment of qualifications, particularly for those with additional support needs.

I move amendment 1.

In the same item of business

The Deputy Presiding Officer (Liam McArthur) LD
The next item of business is stage 3 proceedings on the Education (Scotland) Bill. In dealing with the amendments, members should have the bill as amended at...
The Deputy Presiding Officer LD
Group 1 is on support needs. Amendment 1, in the name of Miles Briggs, is grouped with amendments 5, 165 to 168, 321, 248, 249 and 76.
Miles Briggs (Lothian) (Con) Con
In the interests of brevity, I will try to speed up my comments during the rest of the afternoon. I was pleased to lodge this suite of amendments following ...
Pam Duncan-Glancy (Glasgow) (Lab) Lab
First, let me say a huge thank you to the legislation team, who have been working day and night to support members across the chamber with the amendments tha...
The Cabinet Secretary for Education and Skills (Jenny Gilruth) SNP
I thank Mr Briggs and Ms Duncan-Glancy for setting out their amendments. I put on the record my sincere thanks to Scottish Government officials in the legisl...
The Deputy Presiding Officer LD
I call Miles Briggs to wind up and say whether he wishes to press or withdraw amendment 1.
Miles Briggs Con
I have nothing further to add, and I press the amendment. Amendment 1 agreed to. Section 4—The accreditation function
The Deputy Presiding Officer LD
Group 2 is on accreditation and quality assurance of qualifications. Amendment 98, in the name of Pam Duncan-Glancy, is grouped with amendments 125, 147, 154...
Pam Duncan-Glancy Lab
I ask members to please be patient and consider what I say carefully as I outline a number of the amendments in this group, which may take a bit of time. Th...
Ross Greer (West Scotland) (Green) Green
Will the member take an intervention?
Pam Duncan-Glancy Lab
I am happy to take Ross Greer’s intervention.
Ross Greer Green
Would the member join me in recognising the difference between accreditation and quality assurance? Simply moving the current accreditation function to any o...
Pam Duncan-Glancy Lab
Mr Greer is quite right in relation to higher history, but he did not point out that, although the SQA does not accredit or regulate our school qualification...
Jenny Gilruth SNP
We debated the issue at length at stage 2. I remind Pam Duncan-Glancy of correspondence that the committee and I received from Unite the Union, which represe...
Pam Duncan-Glancy Lab
I thank the cabinet secretary for that intervention, which I was prepared for. The cabinet secretary knows full well that the members of Unite in the Scottis...
Pam Duncan-Glancy Lab
Did the cabinet secretary wish to make an intervention?
Jenny Gilruth SNP
For the record, I was not laughing at the content of Ms Duncan-Glancy’s contribution.
Pam Duncan-Glancy Lab
I thank the cabinet secretary for that clarification. I am pleased that she will listen to and take seriously what is being said. The Education, Children an...
The Cabinet Secretary for Finance and Local Government (Shona Robison) SNP
Did I mishear? I thought that I had just heard Pam Duncan-Glancy talk about making good law today. She and her party are voting against the bill, are they not?
Pam Duncan-Glancy Lab
I thank the cabinet secretary—
Martin Whitfield (South Scotland) (Lab) Lab
Will my colleague take an intervention?
Pam Duncan-Glancy Lab
I will.
Martin Whitfield Lab
I am very grateful—Interruption. I suggest that my colleague has articulated clearly the reason for her conclusion in the summation of her contribution. Had—
The Deputy Presiding Officer LD
Resume your seat, Mr Whitfield. This will be a long afternoon and evening. It will be even longer if we do not listen to the member who has the floor, who, ...
Martin Whitfield Lab
I am very grateful, Deputy Presiding Officer. I shudder at your premonition of how today might go. Had members listened to my colleague’s submission, they w...
Pam Duncan-Glancy Lab
I thank the member for that intervention—I enjoy the unity that we have across Scottish Labour, which is not something that we always see across the Governme...
The Deputy Presiding Officer LD
Before calling the next speaker, I want members to reflect on the fact that discussions took place with business managers and members with key amendments abo...
Willie Rennie (North East Fife) (LD) LD
I fully respect Pam Duncan-Glancy, but I must disagree with her this afternoon. The fact that she has presented a number of options shows that there is still...
Pam Duncan-Glancy Lab
I hugely respect the member and it pains me to have to disagree with his direction of travel here. The reason why there are options is not that we have not c...
Willie Rennie LD
The process has been constructive. It is a good example of how committees can work well together. We have come to an issue that is not central to the reform...