Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
13
Parties on record
2,355,091
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,355,091 contributions in session S6, 16 Apr 2026 – 16 May 2026. Latest 30 days: 148. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 14 May 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament 11 June 2025

11 Jun 2025 · S6 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Lomond Banks Planning Application

I welcome the opportunity to contribute to today’s debate on planning and to respond to the motion on the Lomond Banks development at Balloch. The proposal from Flamingo Land Ltd would undoubtedly bring a significant leisure and tourism development to Balloch but, although investment and tourism are always welcome, we have to ask ourselves what kind of development we want in our national parks and what we are willing to sacrifice in the process. Scotland’s planning system must balance development and investment with our commitments to leadership on the climate, biodiversity and the integrity of our natural environment.

Loch Lomond, which is the largest inland stretch of water in Great Britain by surface area, has long held a cherished place in the heart of Scotland’s natural and cultural heritage, and nowhere can that be seen more than in the loch’s immortalisation in the traditional Scottish ballad “The Bonnie Banks of Loch Lomond”—a poignant song that has become a proud symbol of Scottish identity worldwide.

The loch’s natural beauty is unparalleled. With more than 30 islands dotting its vast expanse and the majestic Ben Lomond rising from its eastern shore, the scenery captivates visitors all year round. Rich woodlands, tranquil waters and diverse wildlife create a haven for outdoor enthusiasts, nature lovers and artists. However, Loch Lomond’s importance goes beyond tourism and natural splendour. It embodies Scotland’s spirit: resilient, welcoming and proud.

It is fair to say that the proposed Lomond Banks development by Flamingo Land Ltd has drawn considerable public attention since the application was first submitted. Eliciting a record 155,000 objections that raised significant and wide-reaching concerns, it ignited a wave of concern that extends far beyond Scotland’s shores. Tens of thousands have spoken out—locals and environmentalists alike—all driven by a deep love for one of the most iconic landscapes in the world. Their voices all echoed the shared truth that Loch Lomond is much more than just a place; it is a symbol of natural beauty, heritage and national pride. This passionate response shows just how deeply people care and why the area must be safeguarded for future generations.

Although my constituency sits many miles from the banks of Loch Lomond, the response there has been just as ardent. I have received countless emails from constituents, which universally express outrage at and condemnation of the proposals. I strongly believe that the proposed development would be an overdevelopment of the site that would have a disproportionate impact on the landscape and the environment. There could be a sympathetic planning application that would lead to the restoration of the grade A-listed Woodbank house, which is a central feature of the site that is on the buildings at risk register, in addition to the reuse of other listed buildings on the site, but I do not believe that this is the application to do that.

I very much welcome yesterday’s announcement confirming that the appeal regarding the Lomond Banks proposal has been recalled by the Scottish ministers. It is our duty not merely to weigh the merits of the planning application in isolation but to consider its wider consequences for the natural world, future generations and Scotland’s national identity. It is vital that our planning system earns and keeps the public’s trust. People need to know that their views matter, that environmental concerns are being heard and that planning decisions are always fair, open and unbiased. Recalling the appeal is about ensuring exactly that.

The escalation to ministers for thorough reassessment will allow fresh consideration of environmental safeguards, flood risk management, infrastructure capacity and community sentiment. Their engagement with statutory bodies, including SEPA, Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park Authority and local authorities, will ensure that every technical and local concern is rigorously evaluated.

We are here to support responsible development, we believe in sustainable tourism and we stand for a planning system that is built on fairness, justice and long-term care for our country. Recalling the Lomond Banks appeal reflects those values, and it shows that Scotland is serious about protecting our most iconic places and making the planning system work for people and nature.

In the same item of business

The Deputy Presiding Officer (Liam McArthur) LD
The next item of business is a debate on motion S6M-17862, in the name of Jackie Baillie, on planning. I invite members who wish to participate to press thei...
Jackie Baillie (Dumbarton) (Lab) Lab
When Loch Lomond and the Trossachs became Scotland’s first national park in 2002, it was after 60 years of campaigning. Generations of Scots wanted to protec...
Bob Doris (Glasgow Maryhill and Springburn) (SNP) SNP
Will Jackie Baillie give way?
Jackie Baillie Lab
I am happy to, if Bob Doris is brief.
Bob Doris SNP
As someone who hails from that part of the world, I concur with Jackie Baillie’s point. My mum and dad were in Levenvale until they passed away. We need more...
Jackie Baillie Lab
I agree absolutely with Bob Doris. I am not against development at the site, but we need to think carefully about the size and appropriateness of any develop...
The Minister for Employment and Investment (Tom Arthur) SNP
As required by the Scottish ministerial code, all ministers are restricted from commenting publicly on live planning applications, as doing so could potentia...
Daniel Johnson (Edinburgh Southern) (Lab) Lab
Will the minister give way?
Tom Arthur SNP
I am afraid that I am restricting my comments in the debate to my prepared remarks, given that the matter concerns a live planning application. It remains t...
Ross Greer (West Scotland) (Green) Green
Thank you, Deputy Presiding Officer—
The Deputy Presiding Officer LD
Can we have Mr Greer’s microphone on, please?
Ross Greer Green
I hear that this desk is not working, Deputy Presiding Officer. If you give me a second, I will move.
The Deputy Presiding Officer LD
We have a little bit of time in hand, so I can give you the time back.
Ross Greer Green
I will try again. Grand. I thank Jackie Baillie for giving us the opportunity to have this debate and for forcing the move to recall this afternoon. For a ...
Martin Whitfield (South Scotland) (Lab) Lab
Will the member take an intervention?
Ross Greer Green
I am afraid that I do not have time at this point, but I would be happy to take the member’s intervention in closing. Why is it a major development? We are ...
The Deputy Presiding Officer LD
We move to the open debate. I advise the chamber that, unusually, we have a little bit of time in hand, so members should get time back for brief interventio...
Pam Gosal (West Scotland) (Con) Con
I am pleased to open such an important debate on behalf of the Scottish Conservatives, and I thank Jackie Baillie for bringing this important issue to the ch...
The Deputy Presiding Officer LD
Through the chair, Ms Gosal.
Pam Gosal Con
I am sorry. Although I welcome the decision, it is important to know why it was made. Flamingo Land’s development has been unpopular since day 1 and has r...
Jamie Greene (West Scotland) (LD) LD
The proposed development at Loch Lomond has definitely filled my inbox more than any other planning issue over the years. My office has dubbed it the “Loch L...
The Deputy Presiding Officer LD
We move to the open debate. 16:25
Pauline McNeill (Glasgow) (Lab) Lab
The Flamingo Land development clearly resonates across the country as a national concern, and the Scottish Government only just seems to have realised that. ...
Bob Doris (Glasgow Maryhill and Springburn) (SNP) SNP
In this short debate, I will give voice to many of my constituents who have raised concerns over the reporter’s decision on the Lomond Banks application. I d...
Martin Whitfield (South Scotland) (Lab) Lab
It is a pleasure to contribute to the debate. I go back to an interesting question that was posed in the previous debate. Yet again, it rests with Opposition...
Daniel Johnson Lab
Does Martin Whitfield share my reflection that, in a debate in which people have questioned whether the planning system gives confidence to investors and, at...
Martin Whitfield Lab
Perhaps the planning system is for the Scottish Government rather than for any of the parties that Daniel Johnson mentioned. I will comment on section 46(1)...
The Presiding Officer (Alison Johnstone) NPA
Before I call David Torrance, I note that we still have a little time in hand. 16:39
David Torrance (Kirkcaldy) (SNP) SNP
I welcome the opportunity to contribute to today’s debate on planning and to respond to the motion on the Lomond Banks development at Balloch. The proposal f...
The Presiding Officer NPA
We move to the winding-up speeches. 16:43