Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
13
Parties on record
2,355,091
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,355,091 contributions in session S6, 16 Apr 2026 – 16 May 2026. Latest 30 days: 148. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 14 May 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament 27 May 2025

27 May 2025 · S6 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Community-owned Energy
Lumsden, Douglas Con North East Scotland Watch on SPTV

I am sure that everyone knows that the right to an automatic public inquiry is being removed from our local communities. That is what is set out in the new legislation that is coming through, and shamefully so.

This devolved Government should hang its head in shame. Campaign groups feel ignored—that is what it is coming to—as Government ministers refuse to meet them but are happy enough to cosy up to developers. It is a David versus Goliath situation. That is why the proposed reduction from three months to six weeks of the time limit to lodge an objection to onshore energy is a disgrace. The cabinet secretary cares more about pleasing renewable energy companies than she does about standing up for local communities.

We therefore make the call again and ask the Scottish Government when it will not only put more money into community schemes but actually resolve the systemic issues that are preventing communities from standing up to large-scale developments that are ruining our countryside.

The Scottish Conservatives want our local communities to be empowered to grow energy schemes in a proportionate way, with sensible planning and community buy-in to the process. We want them to be properly funded and assisted to not only propose schemes that are advantageous to them but oppose schemes that are detrimental to them. We do not want to see monster pylons littering our countryside with little regard for local concerns, scenery, agriculture or economic growth. It is time for this devolved Government to listen to communities and not sideline them so as to appease its renewable energy company chums.

I move amendment S6M-17648.3, to insert at end:

“recognises that community consent needs to be at the heart of energy production; notes with concern that pylons and other electricity infrastructure are increasingly being built without the support of residents, and calls on the Scottish Government to give these communities more say over local energy production.”

14:49  
References in this contribution

Motions, questions or amendments mentioned by their reference code.

In the same item of business

The Deputy Presiding Officer (Liam McArthur) LD
The next item of business is a debate on motion S6M-17648, in the name of Gillian Martin, on growing community-owned energy in Scotland. I invite members who...
The Acting Cabinet Secretary for Net Zero and Energy (Gillian Martin) SNP
I am grateful for the opportunity to open today’s debate and to shine an important spotlight on community-owned energy in Scotland. The Scottish Government ...
Maurice Golden (North East Scotland) (Con) Con
Has any consideration been given to how benefits will be spread to communities that might not, for example, be located next to a large wind farm, but might s...
Gillian Martin SNP
There are a number of things at play. The member will be aware that, after a great deal of encouragement from the Scottish Government, the UK Government has ...
Patrick Harvie (Glasgow) (Green) Green
The cabinet secretary is setting out reasons why community ownership has significant benefits and there is very little dissent from that principle. Renewable...
Gillian Martin SNP
There are a few reasons for that. Historically, communities felt that they almost had to be engineers or to have an expert in their community, and one of the...
Alex Rowley (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Lab) Lab
Does the cabinet secretary believe that councils have an important role to play in supporting community organisations?
Gillian Martin SNP
It is the essence of community wealth building and community empowerment that local authorities work with those in their communities who want to take up some...
Finlay Carson (Galloway and West Dumfries) (Con) Con
What protection do your plans give to communities that do not want any more wind power infrastructure or any more battery storage?
The Deputy Presiding Officer LD
Always speak through the chair.
Gillian Martin SNP
This debate is about communities that want to have their own community-owned schemes, rather than being anything to do with planning or consents. If the memb...
Sarah Boyack (Lothian) (Lab) Lab
I very much welcome the cabinet secretary’s outlining that support. Would she agree that we should also be thinking about support for local authorities, so t...
The Deputy Presiding Officer LD
I can give you the time back for some of the interventions, cabinet secretary.
Gillian Martin SNP
I am open to any suggestions that would mean having more local authority schemes. If there are any barriers in the way, I would like to investigate what they...
The Deputy Presiding Officer LD
I advise members that we have a bit of time in hand, so those who take interventions will certainly get the time back. 14:36
Douglas Lumsden (North East Scotland) (Con) Con
I think that there will be a lot that we agree on this afternoon. Community-owned energy is becoming an increasingly important element in our energy producti...
Gillian Martin SNP
I can confirm that that is shared funding from both Governments. It has not been repurposed; it is new money. It is for the expansion of the capacity of CARE...
Douglas Lumsden Con
I thank the cabinet secretary for that important clarification. We often hear that funds have gone from one place to another, so it is good to hear that that...
Audrey Nicoll (Aberdeen South and North Kincardine) (SNP) SNP
I understand the member’s point about skills and knowledge but, as a constituency MSP, I have had a number of retired engineers from the oil and gas sector c...
Douglas Lumsden Con
I absolutely agree with Audrey Nicoll. A lot depends on skilled people, but they are not always there for the duration because the process is so long.
Christine Grahame (Midlothian South, Tweeddale and Lauderdale) (SNP) SNP
I never thought that I would hear myself saying this, but I agree with Douglas Lumsden. It is quite difficult for certain communities to navigate their way t...
Douglas Lumsden Con
There is more that we can do; if we can give our local authorities more help so that they, too, can help in that process, that would be a good thing. Thirdl...
Gillian Martin SNP
I said to Mr Lumsden this morning that the legislative consent memorandum actually mandates community engagement, whereas at the moment that is voluntary. It...
Douglas Lumsden Con
Once again, the cabinet secretary takes the bits that she likes but ignores the other parts. The Government is taking away the right to a public inquiry and ...
Gillian Martin SNP
On a point of order, Presiding Officer. The record will show that I said in committee this morning that the right to a public inquiry stays. Mr Lumsden is de...
The Deputy Presiding Officer LD
Cabinet secretary, could I ask you perhaps to rephrase that last comment, please?
Gillian Martin SNP
From what Mr Lumsden has said, I fear that he is not taking on board the facts that I laid out this morning at committee.
The Deputy Presiding Officer LD
Thank you. That was not a point of order. Please continue, Mr Lumsden.
Douglas Lumsden Con
I am sure that everyone knows that the right to an automatic public inquiry is being removed from our local communities. That is what is set out in the new l...
Sarah Boyack (Lothian) (Lab) Lab
I welcome today’s debate because the issue of community energy is a crucial one for us to debate. As a Labour and Co-operative member, I am proud to be a mem...