Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
14
Parties on record
2,095,827
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,095,827 contributions in session S6, 11 May 2026 – 10 Jun 2026. Latest 30 days: 2,655. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 09 Jun 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament 15 May 2025

15 May 2025 · S6 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Scotland in Today’s Europe

If we want more people to work in the care sector, we need to start paying care workers more money. The trade unions in the care sector have been demanding £15 an hour from the SNP Government, and the Government has come nowhere near meeting that demand. If we are serious about investing in and retaining staff in the care sector, we need to pay our workers more.

To protect Scotland’s interests, we want to ensure that we have a veterinary and sanitary and phytosanitary agreement that will boost support for agricultural products and allow food and drink to be traded more cheaply between the UK and the EU. Removing those barriers would also improve exports. A study by Aston University estimates that an agreement could increase agri-food exports from the UK to the EU by at least 22.5 per cent. Other issues will be discussed, including youth mobility, energy co-operation, defence and security and, in particular, our support for Ukraine. The UK and the EU will have different priorities, as we have heard, but I welcome the UK Labour Government’s statement that it will work in the national interest as well as seek co-operation with our European friends and neighbours on key issues, in line with the manifesto on which Labour was elected.

This is a serious approach from a UK Government that is serious about rebuilding our economy and our relations with the EU. As I said at the start, the SNP Government should focus on its responsibility for improving living standards and economic growth, using its powers and the record funding settlement that it has had from the UK Government. However, the SNP Government’s ultimate policy position—for as long as that lasts—will run counter to that objective.

I move amendment S6M-17539.1, to leave out from “agrees” to end and insert:

“welcomes the UK Government resetting the UK’s relationship with the EU following the chaotic and damaging approach of the previous UK Conservative administration; further welcomes the summit to be held on 19 May 2025; welcomes the commitment by the UK Government to create a strategic partnership between the UK and the EU to agree a path forward on trade, security and defence; believes that economic growth, raising living standards and defence and security must be the highest of priorities for the Scottish and UK governments; welcomes the UK Government’s specific commitment to negotiate a sanitary and phytosanitary veterinary agreement so that agricultural products, food and drink can be traded more cheaply between the EU and the UK, which could boost agri-food exports to the EU by up to 22.5%; further welcomes the commitment by the Prime Minister to improve security co-operation with the EU and to increase defence spending to 2.5% of GDP from April 2027, which will benefit jobs and industries in Scotland; welcomes the UK Government’s newly negotiated trade deals with the United States and India, noting the importance of the latter for Scotland’s whisky industry; calls on the Scottish Government to support the UK Government’s efforts to rebuild the relationship with European friends and neighbours, and further calls on the Scottish Government to set out what actions it will take to improve economic growth and living standards in Scotland, including whether its public procurement processes will emulate those in other European countries in driving place-based industrial development, using the powers that it has and the record funding settlement that it has received from the UK Government of £47.7 billion this financial year.”

15:34  
References in this contribution

Motions, questions or amendments mentioned by their reference code.

In the same item of business

The Deputy Presiding Officer (Liam McArthur) LD
The next item of business is a debate on motion S6M-17539, in the name of Angus Robertson, on Scotland in today’s Europe. I invite members who wish to partic...
The Cabinet Secretary for Constitution, External Affairs and Culture (Angus Robertson) SNP
This year, we mark 75 years since the signing of the Schuman declaration on 9 May 1950. Last Friday, I and others in the chamber celebrated Europe day and th...
Alex Cole-Hamilton (Edinburgh Western) (LD) LD
The Liberal Democrats will support today’s Government motion. The cabinet secretary is right to refer to the European Coal and Steel Community, the establish...
Angus Robertson SNP
I thank the Liberal Democrats for their support for the Government’s motion. It has been drafted in a way that has received a welcome from other parties, whi...
Patrick Harvie (Glasgow) (Green) Green
I agree with the sentiment that the cabinet secretary expresses, but does he agree that that sentiment would be given fuller expression if the UK and the EU ...
The Deputy Presiding Officer LD
I can give you the time back, cabinet secretary.
Angus Robertson SNP
I certainly agree that sanctions should be respected and that any evidence of companies trying to get round those should be brought to light. Interruption. I...
Stephen Kerr (Central Scotland) (Con) Con
Will the cabinet secretary take an intervention?
Angus Robertson SNP
If the member does not mind, I will not take the intervention now as I want to make a bit more progress. It is important that we understand and respect that...
Stephen Kerr Con
Will the cabinet secretary take an intervention?
Angus Robertson SNP
I will.
Stephen Kerr Con
I am grateful to the cabinet secretary. I wanted to intervene earlier, when he talked about the forthcoming UK-EU summit in London. He will have seen, as I s...
The Deputy Presiding Officer LD
Cabinet secretary, I can give you the time back for the intervention.
Angus Robertson SNP
I will come to that specifically in a moment, and, indeed, in my summing up; I will answer that in full in the course of the debate, for reasons that will be...
Clare Adamson (Motherwell and Wishaw) (SNP) SNP
During your discussions with the UK Government, has there been any detail about an agreement that was sought involving the potential fisheries arrangements—a...
The Deputy Presiding Officer LD
Always speak through the chair.
Angus Robertson SNP
I confirm to Clare Adamson and to the Parliament that the United Kingdom Government has had no detailed discussion with the Scottish Government, the Northern...
Neil Bibby (West Scotland) (Lab) Lab
Will the member take an intervention?
Angus Robertson SNP
I will give way to Mr Bibby. He might be able to explain that.
Neil Bibby Lab
Well, I will explain to the cabinet secretary that if we rejoined the EU—as is his position—we would be rejoining the common fisheries policy. On economic g...
Angus Robertson SNP
I always welcome economic growth, but I will not welcome holding discussions on behalf of the Parliament, the Scottish Government and the country but not inv...
Alex Cole-Hamilton LD
The cabinet secretary kindly invited me to intervene at this stage in his remarks, and I am gratified to hear that a number of the clauses that were in the L...
Angus Robertson SNP
Indeed, they are, and there is largely consensus on that. At least, perhaps there is consensus—I am not entirely sure what the position of the Scottish Conse...
The Deputy Presiding Officer LD
Thank you, cabinet secretary. I call Stephen Kerr to speak to and move amendment S6M-17539.4. You have a generous eight minutes, Mr Kerr. 15:14
Stephen Kerr (Central Scotland) (Con) Con
I do not think that the cabinet secretary actually answered the question that I asked in my intervention. I am happy for him to intervene on me to answer the...
Angus Robertson SNP
I am happy to make an intervention. No, I would not be pleased to see defence and security co-operation being conditional on any other consideration. I belie...
The Deputy Presiding Officer LD
I can give you the time back, Mr Kerr.
Stephen Kerr Con
The relationship between the Scottish Government and the UK Government is a long-running story. On taking office, the Labour Party thought that it could rese...
Douglas Lumsden (North East Scotland) (Con) Con
Will the member take an intervention?
Stephen Kerr Con
Of course I will.