Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
13
Parties on record
2,355,091
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,355,091 contributions in session S6, 16 Apr 2026 – 16 May 2026. Latest 30 days: 148. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 14 May 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament 30 April 2025

30 Apr 2025 · S6 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Motorists

It is not an omission, Mr Cole-Hamilton. The point is about roads across the country generally. We did not want to specify and single out individual roads because we wanted to make the debate relevant to all of Scotland and not just those who rely on some of our rural connectivity.

The insidious drip-drip effect of anti-car policies is hampering our economy and connectivity, and punishing Scots who are already hard pressed. The SNP must stop viewing car drivers as bogeymen and end its war on Scotland’s motorists by moving away from those damaging policies. After all, the SNP scrapped its target to reduce car use by 20 per cent by 2030 after Audit Scotland said that there was no costed delivery plan or clear milestones. That is a stark admission of failure, but one that was entirely foreseeable. The Audit Scotland report confirmed what many of us suspected: that there was no costed delivery plan, no measurable milestones and no realistic understanding of how such a dramatic reduction could be achieved without crippling those who rely on cars daily.

What we need is a pragmatic shift in approach—no more fines, zones or restrictions. We should be encouraging positive change, through investment in electric vehicle infrastructure; incentives for greener choices, including public transport and park and rides; and proper road maintenance that makes driving safer and more efficient, not more difficult.

SNP ministers need to show some common sense and focus on incentives rather than penalties to encourage motorists to be part of an affordable transition.

The implementation of low-emission zones has hindered businesses, residents and motorists in Edinburgh, Glasgow, Aberdeen and Dundee. Fines in Glasgow and Edinburgh are extremely punitive, starting at £60 and doubling with each repeat offence, up to a cap of £480 per day. That places a disproportionate burden on low-income drivers who cannot afford to replace older vehicles. The reality is that the low-emission zones have cost more than £13 million of taxpayers’ money to set up in Scotland but are making a minimal difference to air quality. It is important that ministers review their effectiveness before any new zones are proposed or the current ones are expanded, and we must reconsider the punitive fines.

Unbelievably, the SNP has spent three years and £500,000 of taxpayers’ money on its plan to cut national speed limits on single-carriageway roads from 60mph to 50mph, yet there is no clear evidence that a blanket reduction would deliver significant safety benefits. Such a reduction would impact commuters and significantly impact the agriculture, haulage and logistics sectors across Scotland, placing further strain on productivity.

Scotland’s road network is in a state of steady decline, and motorists are paying the price. Almost 500,000 potholes have been reported to Scottish local authorities since 2021, and Edinburgh has been named as Scotland’s pothole capital, with more potholes that Aberdeen, Dundee and Glasgow put together.

Resurfacing rather than refilling is the best solution to tackle Scotland’s pothole problem. That is obvious when we consider that almost half a billion pounds has been spent on fixing potholes since 2022, yet our roads are still in a terrible condition. That must be backed by a more co-ordinated effort among the Scottish Government, the Office of the Scottish Road Works Commissioner, local authorities and utility companies.

Too often, road works sites sit idle, causing needless congestion and frustration. When one utility company has finished, it is often only a few weeks, sometimes days, before the next company comes in and digs up exactly the same stretch of road. No wonder it is frustrating for residents and drivers. Ministers must seek ways to discourage inactivity on road works sites and to incentivise finishing road works ahead of time.

Finally, we are calling for greater action to future proof Scotland’s electric vehicle charging network. “Just Transition: A Draft Just Transition Plan for Transport in Scotland” acknowledges that increasing EV car ownership alone is not enough. The charging infrastructure must be put in place if more people are to start using EVs. Motorists cannot be expected to shift to EVs without confidence that charging is accessible, affordable and convenient. I am an EV user, but charging issues were the biggest barrier when making the choice to get an EV. That is the case for many people, especially those who do not have home charging and who rely on the public charging network. Our charging network has different kilowatt chargers, all with differing fees and differing penalties for overstaying. Those factors are contingent on the decisions that are taken by local authorities.

We have lodged a motion that calls on the SNP to finally end the war on motorists. Its anti-car policies are damaging our economy and punishing hard-pressed Scots.

I move,

That the Parliament calls on the Scottish Government to take greater action to support Scotland’s motorists and to cease implementing punitive measures against road users, which have been described as a war on Scotland’s motorists; recognises the importance of motorists to the Scottish economy and connectivity; acknowledges that the Scottish Government has abandoned its plans to reduce car use by 20% by 2030 and welcomes the recent Audit Scotland report that states that the Scottish Ministers had “no costed delivery plan or measurable milestones” to achieve this target; calls on the Scottish Ministers to focus on incentives, rather than penalties, to encourage motorists to change their behaviour as part of an affordable transition; notes that the implementation of low emission zones has hindered businesses and motorists in Edinburgh, Glasgow, Aberdeen and Dundee, and calls on ministers to review the effectiveness of low emission zones before any new zones are proposed, or the current ones are expanded, and to reconsider the punitive fines; recognises that road users in Aberdeen have been hindered by the introduction of bus gates, and that motorists across Scotland have been restricted by the expansion of parking charges; urges the Scottish Ministers not to introduce 50 mph speed limits on national speed limit single carriageway roads; recognises that resurfacing, rather than refilling, is the best solution to tackle Scotland’s pothole problem; urges ministers to work more effectively with the Scottish Road Works Commissioner, local authority road works coordinators and utility companies to encourage less inactivity on road work sites and to incentivise finishing works ahead of time; calls for greater action to futureproof Scotland’s EV charger network, and further calls on the Scottish Government to recognise the vital role that motorists play in Scotland.

15:29  

In the same item of business

The Deputy Presiding Officer (Annabelle Ewing) SNP
The next item of business is a debate on motion S6M-17362, in the name of Sue Webber, on ending the war against Scotland’s motorists. Members who wish to spe...
Sue Webber (Lothian) (Con) Con
The Scottish Conservatives will always stand up for motorists, unlike the left-wing parties in this chamber, who continue to treat them with disdain. For too...
Alex Cole-Hamilton (Edinburgh Western) (LD) LD
Will Sue Webber take an intervention?
Sue Webber Con
If Mr Cole-Hamilton does not mind, I will come to him in a second, once I have got a bit more traction. Despite what the SNP says in its amendment, it is no...
Alex Cole-Hamilton LD
Liberal Democrats believe that we should incentivise people to get out of cars and into public transport, but we agree that we need to improve Scotland’s roa...
Sue Webber Con
It is not an omission, Mr Cole-Hamilton. The point is about roads across the country generally. We did not want to specify and single out individual roads be...
The Minister for Agriculture and Connectivity (Jim Fairlie) SNP
I thank colleagues for the opportunity to set out to Parliament the importance and the impact of our policies and investments relating to road users, infrast...
Sue Webber Con
Will the minister take an intervention?
Jim Fairlie SNP
I will take it in a second. I hope that we can reset the level of our discussion in order to find a solution that we can all agree to work on.
Sue Webber Con
Can the minister refer to anything that I said in my remarks today that did not acknowledge that motorists want to be part of an affordable transition?
Jim Fairlie SNP
I am talking about the language that was used in the motion bringing the debate to the Parliament in the first place. I recognise the fundamental importance...
Sarah Boyack (Lothian) (Lab) Lab
There was a discussion at the Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee meeting this week on what more the Scottish Government could do to ensure that we have...
Jim Fairlie SNP
I will try to come to that as I make my way through my speech. We all accept that we want to have alternatives to car use; as I said, I think that that is w...
Liam Kerr (North East Scotland) (Con) Con
Will the minister take an intervention?
Jim Fairlie SNP
Let me finish the point that I am making. Scotland reached its target of 6,000 public EV charge points two years early through a combination of Scottish Gove...
Liam Kerr Con
Does the minister regret the failure of all the ministers who came before him to set out a costed delivery plan and milestones to reduce car use by 20 per ce...
Jim Fairlie SNP
It is not a case of regretting what other ministers have done. I am standing here today as the minister who is contributing to the debate that has been broug...
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
Minister, I ask you to bring your remarks to a close and to move your amendment, please.
Jim Fairlie SNP
—and the code of practice for co-ordination of road works. Presiding Officer, I will finish my remarks there. I move amendment S6M-17362.4, to leave out fr...
Claire Baker (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Lab) Lab
We are having a very short debate that is attempting to cover many aspects of transport policy. We have already heard from the Conservative spokesperson and ...
Craig Hoy (South Scotland) (Con) Con
Is the member aware that many bus companies are facing extreme financial pressures as a result of the Labour UK Government’s imposition of increased employer...
Claire Baker Lab
The member will probably agree that the decline in bus services in Scotland happened long before Labour came into government. For years under the SNP, we hav...
Jim Fairlie SNP
Will the member give way?
Claire Baker Lab
I am quite pressed for time, but I will do so if the minister can be very brief.
Jim Fairlie SNP
On the member’s point about certain areas not having bus services, is that not more to do with the fact that it is a deregulated market? In addition, irrespe...
Claire Baker Lab
I agree with what the Government’s amendment says about deregulation and the impact that that has had. However, the SNP Government has done little to reverse...
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
Ms Baker will need to conclude and move her amendment.
Claire Baker Lab
I will just say something about electric cars. We need to do more to increase the attraction of electric cars.
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
Thank you. I ask Ms Baker to move her amendment.
Claire Baker Lab
We need to do more to make sure that we have a transport strategy that works for all our communities. I move amendment S6M-17362.1, to leave out from first ...