Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
14
Parties on record
2,095,827
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,095,827 contributions in session S6, 11 May 2026 – 10 Jun 2026. Latest 30 days: 2,655. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 09 Jun 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament 26 February 2025

26 Feb 2025 · S6 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Rail Fares

I remind members of my voluntary registration of trade union interests.

Last month, the Accounts Commission teamed up with the Auditor General to publish a hard-hitting report on the Government’s wish to reduce car use in Scotland by 20 per cent by 2030. They gave evidence to the Public Audit Committee just this morning. What they found was that there had been no consultation on the setting of that target, that there is no clear or costed plan to meet that target, that there are no measurable milestones towards that target, that there are no equality impact assessments and that the Scottish Government’s arrangements for monitoring and scrutinising progress are insufficient. In fact, the failings are of such a magnitude that they conclude that it is

“not possible to see how the national target of 20 per cent will be achieved”,

and that it is

“impossible to understand which interventions will have the most impact on the target or deliver the best value for money.”

It is little wonder that their key message is that there is a “lack of leadership”.

In the same report, the ScotRail peak fares pilot is considered as a test case. The cabinet secretary hides behind the evaluation report, but she should listen to this conclusion from the Auditor General:

“The evaluation report does not outline the impact ... reinstating peak fares will have on car use or acknowledge that it can take time to sustain positive behavioural changes, such as encouraging modal shift from car to rail use.”

As the RMT union has pointed out, that the evaluation report does not assess the impact on passenger use at peak times is “a glaring omission”.

Let me say this to the Government: you cannot claim to be committed to cutting car miles when you are driving up the cost to passengers of train miles. You cannot welcome COP26 to Glasgow, declare to the world a climate emergency, raise the hopes of the people and then hope that no one will notice that you have reneged on nearly every one of the undertakings that you gave and all of the goals and targets that you set. The 2030 emissions reduction target—dropped. The climate change plan—delayed. The spending commitment to active travel—axed. The bus partnership fund—discontinued. Spending on rail—down. Spending on trunk roads—up. I say to the cabinet secretary that these are contradictions that cannot be left unchallenged, that these are conclusions that cannot be denied and that this is a calamitous climate catastrophe that cannot be ignored.

One of the reasons why I am a democratic socialist is that I believe that ownership is power. The Government is the sole shareholder of ScotRail and it has the power to embark on a bold and radical course of action. If the Scottish Government chooses not to act—chooses not to exercise that power for the common good—and if that requires this Government to be led by this Parliament this afternoon, then so be it, because, in the end, it is our duty to reverse these proposed hikes in rail fares, to abolish these peak train fares once and for all and to stop the cuts to ticket offices.

We understand that the Government’s present course of action does not reduce inequalities but widens them, and that needs to be noted. We must understand that we need not just words, but deeds. We need clear, urgent action and we need a compelling vision. I, for one, will be voting for the Green motion and for the Labour amendment to achieve that this afternoon.

16:40  

In the same item of business

The Deputy Presiding Officer (Annabelle Ewing) SNP
The next item of business is a debate on motion S6M-16572, in the name of Mark Ruskell, on cheaper rail fares. I invite members who wish to speak in the deba...
Mark Ruskell (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Green) Green
I acknowledge up front that bringing ScotRail into public ownership has been a welcome move by the Scottish Government that has put the public interest at th...
The Cabinet Secretary for Transport (Fiona Hyslop) SNP
I reassure Mark Ruskell that integrated ticketing is happening, but does he recognise that 75 per cent of public sector journeys are on buses? Is it the posi...
Mark Ruskell Green
No—it is not an either/or. The cabinet secretary would do well to reflect on the fact that many people use multiple modes of transport and that integration i...
The Cabinet Secretary for Transport (Fiona Hyslop) SNP
The Government agrees that we must make public transport accessible, affordable and reliable in order to encourage more people to travel by bus and train. T...
Ross Greer (West Scotland) (Green) Green
I encourage the cabinet secretary to check the record in reference to what we proposed during budget negotiations. She knows that the Scottish Greens have ma...
Fiona Hyslop SNP
I am sorry, but I asked my officials to check whether introducing a 3.8 per cent increase and rail fare freeze were part of budget discussions, and I was rea...
Paul Sweeney (Glasgow) (Lab) Lab
Will the cabinet secretary give way?
Fiona Hyslop SNP
I have limited time. The 2025-26 transport budget focuses on that, but it also focuses on funding actions that will help to cut carbon emissions. Decisions ...
Claire Baker (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Lab) Lab
Will the cabinet secretary take an intervention?
Fiona Hyslop SNP
I have limited time. We are seeking to keep fares down for regular passengers and commuters through the 20 per cent discount on all ScotRail season tickets—...
Paul Sweeney Lab
Will the cabinet secretary take an intervention?
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
The cabinet secretary is about to conclude.
Fiona Hyslop SNP
I apologise to Mr Sweeney. Those price and fare innovations are designed to encourage people to switch from car to train and to simplify journey planning. T...
Sue Webber (Lothian) (Con) Con
We know that an efficient transport network that delivers value for money for taxpayers is essential for economic and social development across Scotland. How...
Fiona Hyslop SNP
I think that Sue Webber would acknowledge that there has been a great deal of hybrid working, with people who have been working from home not using any form ...
Sue Webber Con
I am certain that, if we had fair and less expensive fares, passenger numbers would be even greater. Despite the reduced number of passenger journeys, ScotR...
Maggie Chapman (North East Scotland) (Green) Green
Will the member take an intervention?
Sue Webber Con
No—sorry. We are short of time. Unsurprisingly, only one fifth of passengers think that ScotRail delivers good value for money. Polling found that 46.4 per ...
Claire Baker (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Lab) Lab
Scottish Labour agrees that rail fares in Scotland must be more affordable and that rail travel must be an attractive alternative to car use. We are committe...
Beatrice Wishart (Shetland Islands) (LD) LD
I welcome the opportunity to reply on behalf of the Scottish Liberal Democrats. We believe that rail needs to be affordable, that ticketing is too complex an...
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
We move to the open debate, with back-bench speeches of up to four minutes. 16:24
Ariane Burgess (Highlands and Islands) (Green) Green
For a moment, Presiding Officer, imagine yourself in the shoes of my constituent. You need to get to work. It is rush hour. You check the train price—it is w...
Clare Adamson (Motherwell and Wishaw) (SNP) SNP
I will start with a bit of consensus. I think that everyone agrees that we want rail travel to be affordable. We want to encourage more people to use public ...
Claire Baker Lab
Will the member take an intervention?
Clare Adamson SNP
I am sorry—I have only a short time left. The pilot showed minimal impacts overall on car travel. Only 0.1 per cent of car journeys moved to rail during th...
Maurice Golden (North East Scotland) (Con) Con
I will use my speech today to talk about the role of public transport in general, but first let me address the motion that is before us and the specific issu...
Fiona Hyslop SNP
The member has raised an important point about integrated ticketing. The advice that we received from our smart ticketing advisory board is that the increasi...
Maurice Golden Con
I accept that, and I take the point on board, but some people will still require a card. Our train stations should be accessible and appealing to visit. Th...
Richard Leonard (Central Scotland) (Lab) Lab
I remind members of my voluntary registration of trade union interests. Last month, the Accounts Commission teamed up with the Auditor General to publish a ...