Meeting of the Parliament 26 February 2025
I apologise to Mr Sweeney.
Those price and fare innovations are designed to encourage people to switch from car to train and to simplify journey planning. They are the thoughtful and well-planned interventions that we need, whereas the poorly timed proposals in the motion sadly seem to be more about defeating the Government than about having a rational and creative debate about funding and support for rail travel in Scotland.
I move amendment S6M-16572.3, to leave out from first “fares” to end and insert:
“and bus fares must be affordable to encourage the use of public transport; welcomes that rail passenger numbers, since the off-peak all-day pilot ended, have continued to grow, with demand in each four-week period being an average of 4.5% more than the same period in 2024, when the trial was in place; notes that the Scottish Budget for 2025-26 includes provision for a pilot of a £2 bus fare cap; recognises that the results of the off-peak all-day pilot mirror the results of Transport for London’s similar trial, which also saw no significant increase in travel as a result of lower fares; further recognises that reinstating off-peak fares all day from 1 April 2025 would cost up to £40 million of resource funding, which would require a commensurate reduction elsewhere in the Transport portfolio’s resource budget; recognises that not implementing a fares rise in 2025 would require an additional £11 million, which would require a commensurate reduction elsewhere in the Transport portfolio’s resource budget, and believes that any further consideration of off-peak fares all day should take account of the Transport Scotland and Transport for London research, be part of future budget planning and must also consider progress on bus affordability, availability and reliability across Scotland.”
16:11Motions, questions or amendments mentioned by their reference code.