Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
13
Parties on record
2,355,091
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,355,091 contributions in session S6, 17 Apr 2026 – 17 May 2026. Latest 30 days: 148. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 14 May 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament 20 February 2025

20 Feb 2025 · S6 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Great British Energy Bill
Lumsden, Douglas Con North East Scotland Watch on SPTV

It is fraudulent when we are promised 1,000 jobs but the chair of GB Energy then says, “Well, those jobs will perhaps come in 20 years’ time.” That is what I call fraudulent: it is a joke.

We have Labour and the SNP—two partners in crime—determined to destroy the countryside with pylons, and both turning a blind eye to the desecration of the north and north-east of Scotland. We have Labour and the SNP—two partners in crime—determined to destroy the oil and gas industry and, with it, tens of thousands of well-paid jobs.

It is common sense not to have a ban without a plan. We on this side of the chamber understand that, and Unite the union understands it. Like Unite, I will fight for my constituents and to save the jobs of the North Sea oil workers. It is shameful how few Labour MSPs have signed up to Unite’s campaign. It is a party that is meant to stand up for workers. Instead, it is siding with its donors and Just Stop Oil.

Like GB Energy itself, the process that we are being asked to follow in approving the LCM is a joke. We had an LCM a couple of weeks back and a supplementary one was lodged on Monday, which—as the convener said—gave no time for the Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee to scrutinise the impact before the Parliament makes the decision today. That is complete disrespect for this Parliament. It sounds as though we might have another LCM coming next week.

What will the LCM change? From what I can gather, it will add amendments on sustainable development. The definition of sustainable development is:

“development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs”.

What about the future generations who will have their countryside ruined by the overindustrialisation that we are seeing? What about the future generations who will have prime agricultural land taken away and replaced by battery storage sites, substations or solar panels?

Earlier this week, I met the Angus Pylon Action Group. It has asked to speak to Gillian Martin, but its request has fallen on deaf ears, as have requests from all other campaign groups. Members of the APAG are devastated by what they are facing. They feel ignored and abandoned by the Government, which talks about engaging with communities but does not want to listen to them. They have real concerns, but are struggling to get answers.

That is where the Scottish Government is also to blame. In the weeks since the last time that we had this debate, there has been no news on the energy strategy. That strategy is now years late. There is no strategy, no plan and no clue. That sums up this devolved Government. We are still working under the shadow of its presumption against new oil and gas, and its presumptions that we should import oil and gas rather than use our own resources, that we should protect jobs in Azerbaijan rather than in Aberdeen and that we should make ourselves poorer while we make the Saudis richer.

We need a commonsense strategy for our energy that puts our own resources and workers at its heart. This Government does not care about oil and gas and it certainly does not care about the people working offshore or in the supply chain. Oil and gas from the North Sea is good for Britain, good for Scotland, good for the environment and good for jobs.

Let us drop the pretence that GB Energy will bring down bills, or be good for investment or for my constituents, because it simply will not.

16:52  

In the same item of business

The Deputy Presiding Officer (Liam McArthur) LD
The next item of business is a debate on motion S6M-16526, in the name of Alasdair Allan, on a legislative consent motion for the Great British Energy Bill, ...
The Acting Minister for Climate Action (Alasdair Allan) SNP
I thank the Parliament for giving us further opportunity to debate the Great British Energy Bill and the supplementary legislative consent memorandum that wa...
Daniel Johnson (Edinburgh Southern) (Lab) Lab
Will the member give way?
Alasdair Allan SNP
Yes, I will.
Daniel Johnson Lab
On that technical point, why is the Government not waiting until the final reading to wrap up the LCMs into a single decision for the Parliament?
Alasdair Allan SNP
This is a matter for the UK Government. The bill is proceeding at great pace and my understanding is that royal assent will be granted very soon—within the n...
Douglas Lumsden (North East Scotland) (Con) Con
Will the member take an intervention?
Alasdair Allan SNP
I have to make progress in the little time that I have available. It is important to note that the Scottish Government was given very little notice of the t...
The Deputy Presiding Officer LD
I call Edward Mountain to speak on behalf of the Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee. 16:43
Edward Mountain (Highlands and Islands) (Con) Con
Here we go, yet again, debating a legislative consent motion on the GB Energy Bill. The first legislative consent motion was lodged in August last year. It d...
Alasdair Allan SNP
Will the member take an intervention?
Edward Mountain Con
No, not at the moment. We did our best under the circumstances, and the report added usefully to the debate, but the committee should have been spared that ...
Douglas Lumsden (North East Scotland) (Con) Con
It is a pleasure to speak to the motion, which is on my favourite topic—the myth that is GB Energy. GB Energy will do nothing for my constituents. It is a f...
Daniel Johnson Lab
The word “fraud” has a very precise meaning. Perhaps Douglas Lumsden could explain his use of it. In case he is not aware of the way in which legislation wo...
Douglas Lumsden Con
It is fraudulent when we are promised 1,000 jobs but the chair of GB Energy then says, “Well, those jobs will perhaps come in 20 years’ time.” That is what I...
Sarah Boyack (Lothian) (Lab) Lab
Members will remember that, in the debate two weeks ago in which when we agreed to the LCM on the Great British Energy Bill, it was flagged up that there wou...
Graham Simpson (Central Scotland) (Con) Con
Does Sarah Boyack think that this Parliament has had sufficient time to consider the LCM?
Sarah Boyack Lab
The irony is that we are debating a very straightforward amendment, because we have debated sustainable development on numerous occasions in the Parliament. ...
Douglas Lumsden Con
Will the member take an intervention?
Sarah Boyack Lab
I certainly will not. I am winding up. Our UK Labour Government has taken more climate action in six months than the Tories did in 14 years in government. T...
Willie Rennie (North East Fife) (LD) LD
It is very Edward Mountain to consider a legislative consent motion that is based on an amendment in the House of Lords on the Great British Energy Bill to b...
Jackie Dunbar (Aberdeen Donside) (SNP) SNP
Presiding Officer, “The untapped resources of the North Sea are as nothing compared to the untapped resources of our people.” Fifty-three years after Jimm...
Daniel Johnson (Edinburgh Southern) (Lab) Lab
It is somewhat ironic to hold a debate on energy at this point on a Thursday afternoon, so let me try that witticism to begin with. In some ways, Jackie Du...
Douglas Lumsden Con
I absolutely accept that there is a need for transition, but a plan needs to be in place. I have signed Unite the union’s campaign pledge for no ban without ...
Daniel Johnson Lab
What does Douglas Lumsden think GB Energy is about?
Douglas Lumsden Con
We do not know. Where is the plan?
Daniel Johnson Lab
It is central to the plan. If Douglas Lumsden wants a plan, he should back GB Energy. For goodness’ sake, we cannot, on the one hand, say that we need a plan...
Kevin Stewart (Aberdeen Central) (SNP) SNP
I agree that we need to reap those benefits. We also need to keep the workforce. I recognise what Mr Johnson said about the legislation not being passed, bu...
Daniel Johnson Lab
I do not need to talk to them in London. I talk to them here, because they are up here regularly. I was talking to Michael Shanks just this morning, and I wi...
Graham Simpson (Central Scotland) (Con) Con
Like Edward Mountain, I take the Parliament’s work very seriously. I like things to be done properly, whatever the outcome. The consideration of the LCM that...