Chamber
Meeting of the Parliament 19 February 2025
19 Feb 2025 · S6 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Decision Time
There will be a division.
The vote is closed.
In the same item of business
The Presiding Officer (Alison Johnstone)
NPA
There are five questions to be put as a result of today’s business. The first question is, that amendment S6M-16511.2, in the name of Rachael Hamilton, which...
The Presiding Officer
NPA
There will be a division. There will be a short suspension to allow members to access the digital voting system. 17:02 Meeting suspended. 17:04 On resuming—
The Presiding Officer
NPA
We move to the vote on amendment S6M-16511.2, in the name of Rachael Hamilton, which seeks to amend motion S6M-16511, in the name of Kate Forbes, on protecti...
The Presiding Officer
NPA
The result of the division on amendment S6M-16511.2, in the name of Rachael Hamilton, is: For 28, Against 74, Abstentions 17. Amendment disagreed to.
The Presiding Officer
NPA
The next question is, that amendment S6M-16511.1, in the name of Neil Bibby, which seeks to amend motion S6M-16511, in the name of Kate Forbes, on protecting...
The Presiding Officer
NPA
There will be a division. The vote is closed. I call Paul Sweeney, who is online, for a point of order.
Paul Sweeney (Glasgow) (Lab)
Lab
On a point of order, Presiding Officer. My app would not connect. I would have voted—Inaudible.
The Presiding Officer
NPA
Would you mind saying that again, Mr Sweeney? We did not quite catch it here.
Paul Sweeney
Lab
Apologies, Presiding Officer. My app would not connect. I would have voted yes.
The Presiding Officer
NPA
Thank you. We will ensure that that is recorded. For Baillie, Jackie (Dumbarton) (Lab) Baker, Claire (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Lab) Bibby, Neil (West Scot...
The Presiding Officer
NPA
The result of the division on amendment S6M-16511.1, in the name of Neil Bibby, is: For 23, Against 97, Abstentions 0. Amendment disagreed to.
The Presiding Officer
NPA
The next question is, that motion S6M-16511, in the name of Kate Forbes, on protecting the powers of the Scottish Parliament, be agreed to. Are we agreed? M...
The Presiding Officer
NPA
There will be a division. The vote is closed.
Ben Macpherson (Edinburgh Northern and Leith) (SNP)
SNP
On a point of order, Presiding Officer. My device would not connect. I would have voted yes.
The Presiding Officer
NPA
Thank you, Mr Macpherson. We will ensure that your vote is recorded.
Pauline McNeill (Glasgow) (Lab)
Lab
On a point of order, Presiding Officer. My device would not connect at all. I would have voted no.
The Presiding Officer
NPA
Thank you, Ms McNeill. We will ensure that your vote is recorded.
Nicola Sturgeon (Glasgow Southside) (SNP)
SNP
On a point of order, Presiding Officer. The app would not connect. I would have voted yes.
The Presiding Officer
NPA
I can confirm that your vote has been recorded. For Adam, George (Paisley) (SNP) Adam, Karen (Banffshire and Buchan Coast) (SNP) Adamson, Clare (Motherwe...
The Presiding Officer
NPA
The result of the division on motion S6M-16511, in the name of Kate Forbes, on protecting the powers of the Scottish Parliament, is: For 73, Against 47, Abst...
The Presiding Officer
NPA
The next question is, that motion S6M-16499, in the name of Paul McLennan, on the Renters’ Rights Bill, which is UK legislation, be agreed to. Motion agreed...
The Presiding Officer
NPA
Unless any member objects, I propose to ask a single question on three Parliamentary Bureau motions. The final question is, that motion S6M-16521, on stage ...
The Presiding Officer
NPA
That concludes decision time.