Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
13
Parties on record
2,355,091
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,355,091 contributions in session S6, 16 Apr 2026 – 16 May 2026. Latest 30 days: 148. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 14 May 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament 16 January 2025

16 Jan 2025 · S6 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
A9 Dualling Programme

I welcome the committee’s debate and its final inquiry report, and I thank all those who were involved in making it a reality, including the petitioner. The inquiry has proved that the Scottish Parliament is open to Scotland’s citizens and that public petitions can have an impact.

I will touch on some of the inquiry’s findings and the Scottish Government’s response to it. It should not be forgotten that at the heart of all this is the fact that the A9 continues to be a dangerous road, with many people sadly having lost their lives when travelling on it. Communities the length of the route, tourists and haulage vehicles use the road to get to where they need to go and to keep services and goods deliveries running across the country. Swift action to address the problems on the A9 has been needed for many years, and continuous delays are a failure of the Scottish Government.

I will highlight and elaborate on some of the inquiry’s findings. The report states that the 2025 target for dualling was missed not due to one single issue or incident but, instead, because of the Scottish Government’s

“failure to reach agreement on programme funding”.

That is thought to have

“significantly contributed to progress stalling as the programme was reaching the procurement and construction stages.”

That might have been remedied with

“an individual whose main or only focus was to progress the A9 dualling programme”.

With the rapid turnover of SNP transport secretaries in recent years, it is little wonder that that was raised as a concern, although I note that the Scottish Government disagrees with those points in its response.

I also note the finding that

“A lack of open, external discussion of the challenges being faced in the delivery of the A9 dualling programme has negatively impacted public confidence in Transport Scotland and its ability to deliver major infrastructure projects within the timescales it says it will”.

It is of great concern that confidence in a Government body such as Transport Scotland is being questioned. The Scottish Government has responded to the committee to say that Transport Scotland’s ability to deliver has not been negatively impacted. There seems to be a misreading of concerns about confidence in the body. Significant effort will need to be ploughed into addressing the public’s confidence in Transport Scotland, and I hope that the Scottish Government will take that on board. Particular attention needs to be paid to addressing confidence in Transport Scotland among communities in the north of Scotland, as projects in central and southern Scotland being completed before the completion of the A9 dualling has led to a confidence deficit in those northern communities, which was picked up by the inquiry.

The Scottish Liberal Democrats welcome the inquiry’s proposal of routine and regular sharing of information with the Parliament as a key way to address concerns about the transparency of decision making on major projects such as those on the A9. I welcome the Scottish Government’s agreement in principle to that.

If I may, I will remark on something that is slightly outside the inquiry. The A9 north of Inverness is also a critical road for the communities that it connects. I recognise that Transport Scotland’s work on safety issues covers the whole of the A9, and it is important that regular assessments are made, as we know that that section of road is vital in ensuring access to public services.

The importance of the A9 in connecting large parts of Scotland means that improving safety on the route should be a priority for the Scottish Government. Dualling the road will help with that, and a new report by the Scottish Government to accelerate that is welcome. I also note that the Government expects to complete work on the £5 million programme of additional measures to enhance safety on the route in advance of dualling by March this year. After so many deadlines being missed, that one needs to be met. Progress on the A9 needs to be realised swiftly for the safety of communities up and down Scotland that use the route.

15:43  

In the same item of business

The Deputy Presiding Officer (Liam McArthur) LD
The next item of business is a debate on motion S6M-16085, in the name of Jackson Carlaw, on behalf of the Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committ...
Jackson Carlaw (Eastwood) (Con) Con
One of the frustrations of opening a debate on behalf of the committee is that I cannot freewheel in my usual style; I have to adhere to a text, which is ver...
Fergus Ewing (Inverness and Nairn) (SNP) SNP
Does Jackson Carlaw agree that the committee looked at not only what went wrong but how to put things right in the future? In that respect, the evidence that...
Jackson Carlaw Con
I hope to say more about that, and I am quite sure that Fergus Ewing will not miss the opportunity to do so himself. Like me, Fergus Ewing will have been sl...
The Cabinet Secretary for Transport (Fiona Hyslop) SNP
I begin by thanking all who contributed to the committee’s work on this inquiry, which arose from its consideration of petition PE1992, which was lodged in 2...
Fergus Ewing SNP
Will the cabinet secretary accept an intervention?
Fiona Hyslop SNP
I would like to move on. On Tuesday of this week, Transport Scotland published a report on its assessment of rescheduling and acceleration proposals for the...
Fergus Ewing SNP
Will the cabinet secretary give way now?
Fiona Hyslop SNP
I will come to you shortly, Mr Ewing. The report published earlier this week shows that rescheduling and reversing the procurement sequence of the sixth and...
Fergus Ewing SNP
The Tomatin to Moy section was announced by Michael Matheson in February 2021 but will not be completed until 2028, taking seven years from start to completi...
The Deputy Presiding Officer LD
I remind members to always speak through the chair. Cabinet secretary, I can give you the time back for the intervention.
Fiona Hyslop SNP
Thank you, Deputy Presiding Officer. There were a number of points in Fergus Ewing’s intervention. As he will know, because he has attended the briefings th...
Jackson Carlaw Con
Will the cabinet secretary take an intervention?
Fiona Hyslop SNP
I was about to close, but, if I have time, I will take the intervention, Deputy Presiding Officer.
The Deputy Presiding Officer LD
Please be brief, Mr Carlaw.
Jackson Carlaw Con
I note the commitment to come forward with a statement following the consideration of matters at the end of this year. The commitment is to bring forward a s...
Fiona Hyslop SNP
I am not sure where the member’s comment that the statement would be brought forward into 2026 came from. That would be a matter for Parliament. I am very ke...
Maurice Golden (North East Scotland) (Con) Con
As a member of the Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee, I thank all those who have participated in the inquiry and those who have supported ...
Fiona Hyslop SNP
I am already accountable to Parliament. I answer questions and I respond. I have given statements and will continue to do so. I report to the Net Zero, Energ...
The Deputy Presiding Officer LD
Interventions will need to be slightly briefer, although we have a bit of time in hand. I will give you the time back, Mr Golden.
Maurice Golden Con
The cabinet secretary will be aware that I sat on the Parliamentary Bureau—
Fiona Hyslop SNP
So did I.
Maurice Golden Con
—and I am aware of the voting on that issue. The bureau is where the Scottish National Party could back the establishment of a specific committee or, as part...
Claire Baker (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Lab) Lab
I thank the Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee for its thorough report. The committee not only took evidence on the petition but included a...
Mark Ruskell (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Green) Green
I thank the committee for its scrutiny of the petition on dualling the A9, and I congratulate Laura Hansler on successfully getting her petition through the ...
Edward Mountain (Highlands and Islands) (Con) Con
I seek confirmation from Mark Ruskell and his party that they are signed up to the dualling of the A9, not just to safety improvements and roundabouts, which...
The Deputy Presiding Officer LD
Speak through the chair. Mr Ruskell, I will give you the time back.
Mark Ruskell Green
I thought that the debate was primarily about safety improvements, in which dualling has a role to play. However, as Mr Mountain will know, it is about much ...
Beatrice Wishart (Shetland Islands) (LD) LD
I welcome the committee’s debate and its final inquiry report, and I thank all those who were involved in making it a reality, including the petitioner. The ...
Emma Roddick (Highlands and Islands) (SNP) SNP
You do not have to wander very far in Inverness or strike up many conversations there to find somebody who has a lot to say about the A9 dualling. I admit to...