Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
13
Parties on record
2,355,091
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,355,091 contributions in session S6, 16 Apr 2026 – 16 May 2026. Latest 30 days: 148. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 14 May 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament 19 November 2024

19 Nov 2024 · S6 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Rural Economy (Impact of United Kingdom Government Budget)

I am grateful to Fergus Ewing for that intervention. Believe it or not, in 11 minutes, as somebody who is involved in the sector, I do not have time to cover everything. Otherwise, I would have got more into diversification and the opportunities that there are. I certainly agree with Fergus Ewing’s points. Such a move would be a real opportunity.

Much has been said in debates on this subject about farmers being asset rich but cash poor. It is already a job with inconsistent financial returns. Costs always seem to go up, but yields and prices can fluctuate widely. In some years, we make a modest profit; in other years, we do not. There is an old farming joke about the farmer who wins the lottery and is asked what he is going to do with the money. He says that he will keep farming until it is all gone.

I turn to our amendment to the Scottish Government’s motion. Governments working together requires commitment from both sides, and our amendment calls for just that. The Scottish Government and the UK Government should work together to deliver the ring-fenced multiyear funding that we—and, I think, SNP members—want.

Our amendment recognises that, in Barnettising agricultural funding, Labour has broken with more than 50 years of certainty. It has ended a social contract that recognised the vital role that farmers play in producing food and as stewards of the countryside, and that rewarded that with some stability.

Our amendment calls on the Scottish Government to ensure that all agricultural funding is allocated to the sector, not diverted for use in other portfolio areas. That has not previously been the case. Although the First Minister has repeated the commitment that £46 million of funding will be returned to the agriculture budget, there is still no commitment on when that will happen, and it is disappointing that the cabinet secretary has not committed to a timescale today.

Given the growing pressure on the farming sector, a longer, more concrete commitment from the Scottish Government is needed to protect rural budgets from having much-needed funding siphoned off to plug gaps in other parts of Government spending. Farmers are also worried about the next Scottish budget and what future Scottish policy holds. They see money being taken from rural budgets, including the £46 million that I just mentioned, the £80 million that has been lost from the rural affairs budget overall and the cuts to pillar 1 payments and the less favoured area support scheme. They have seen the impact of the Scottish Greens in government, and they fear what the Greens might extort from a minority SNP Government that is desperate to pass its budget.

Farming has got harder in the past few years—costs have risen and there is more form filling and box ticking than ever before, but there is still pressure to keep costs as low as possible. Despite efforts to become more efficient and meet increasingly stringent environmental targets, farmers, particularly those of us in the red meat sector, feel more under attack than ever.

Many farmers feel that they are not a priority for the Government, and it is hard to argue against that when, in Orkney, nearly £8 million has been spent on a stoat eradication scheme but only a few thousand pounds has been spent on efforts to combat the damage that geese do to farmland in the islands. That is before we start talking about the challenges in relation to access to land; encouraging new entrants to farming; vital local infrastructure, such as abattoirs; and reliable ferries to get products to market. The Scottish Government has responsibility for all those thing but, too often, has been found wanting.

The previous Conservative UK Government delivered multiyear ring-fenced funding, as well as the largest-ever round of grants to support agricultural funding. Labour promised a new deal for farmers, but it has delivered a raw deal that threatens the future of the sector. Anger is at an all-time high, while confidence is low. Those protesting in London and in Kirkwall this morning, as well as those who will be outside this Parliament next Thursday, are not just fighting one bad policy by one bad Government; they are fighting for the very future of farming. Scottish Conservatives will always stand with them, because we will always be on the side of our rural communities and those who live and work in them.

I move amendment S6M-15508.2, to insert at end:

“; recognises that ring-fenced agriculture funding has been delivered by previous UK administrations for over 50 years; urges both the UK and Scottish governments to work together to ensure certainty for Scotland’s farmers, crofters and rural stakeholders by delivering multi-year ring-fenced funding for agriculture, and calls on the Scottish Government to ensure that all agriculture funding is allocated to the sector and not diverted for use in other portfolio areas.”

15:01  
References in this contribution

Motions, questions or amendments mentioned by their reference code.

In the same item of business

The Presiding Officer (Alison Johnstone) NPA
The next item of business is a debate on motion S6M-15508, in the name of Mairi Gougeon, on the impact of the United Kingdom Government’s budget on Scotland’...
The Cabinet Secretary for Rural Affairs, Land Reform and Islands (Mairi Gougeon) SNP
Being in government presents both the opportunity and the challenge of making choices that have the potential to change people’s lives and livelihoods. Makin...
Rachael Hamilton (Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire) (Con) Con
Did the SNP consult before it snatched £46 million away from the agricultural budget? Did it do an impact assessment?
Mairi Gougeon SNP
I am more than happy to address that point. The member is well aware of where that funding came from. It was from underspends on demand-led schemes. It did n...
Finlay Carson (Galloway and West Dumfries) (Con) Con
On the argument that you make, who, when it comes to funding, is best placed to set the priorities for agriculture in Scotland: Westminster or the Scottish G...
The Presiding Officer NPA
Always speak through the chair, please.
Mairi Gougeon SNP
I have been clear in my comments that, of course, we welcome the fact that we can take decisions on that funding, but that does not take away from the fact t...
Jamie Halcro Johnston (Highlands and Islands) (Con) Con
Will the cabinet secretary give way?
Mairi Gougeon SNP
Not at the moment, as I need to make some progress. What has been allocated—£620 million—is wholly inadequate. That sum fails to account for inflationary pr...
Fergus Ewing (Inverness and Nairn) (SNP) SNP
I have a simple question. I understand that the balance of the convergence money that was recommended by the Bew review, which is entirely for the benefit of...
Mairi Gougeon SNP
The outstanding recommendation from the Bew review relates to the discussion that was due to take place between the four nations about the intra-UK allocatio...
Fergus Ewing SNP
Will the member take an intervention?
Mairi Gougeon SNP
Sorry, no. I need to make some progress. As we know, actions speak louder than words, and I am proud of the work that we do to support Scotland’s farm, crof...
The Presiding Officer NPA
I call Jamie Halcro Johnston to speak to and move amendment S6M-15508.2. 14:50
Jamie Halcro Johnston (Highlands and Islands) (Con) Con
I remind members of my entry in the register of members’ interests, which sets out that I am a partner in the family farming business of J Halcro-Johnston an...
Fergus Ewing SNP
Does Mr Halcro Johnston agree that two positive things that the Scottish Government could do, if it so wished, would be to help further diversification by th...
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Liam McArthur) LD
I can give you the time back for that intervention, Mr Halcro Johnston.
Jamie Halcro Johnston Con
I am grateful to Fergus Ewing for that intervention. Believe it or not, in 11 minutes, as somebody who is involved in the sector, I do not have time to cover...
Colin Smyth (South Scotland) (Lab) Lab
My amendment recognises that last month’s UK Government budget delivers the largest funding settlement for the Scottish Government in the history of devoluti...
Michelle Thomson (Falkirk East) (SNP) SNP
The member is obviously enjoying iterating the budget settlement for the Scottish Government, but could he specifically address how this disaster of a budget...
The Deputy Presiding Officer LD
Colin Smyth, I can give you the time back for the intervention.
Colin Smyth Lab
Labour has made it absolutely clear that difficult and tough choices are being made on taxation. We have heard today that the SNP opposes the changes in inhe...
Kevin Stewart (Aberdeen Central) (SNP) SNP
Will the member take an intervention?
Colin Smyth Lab
Yes, if I have time.
Kevin Stewart SNP
Mr Smyth will be aware that this Government has delivered more affordable housing per head of population than anywhere else in the UK has. I would certainly ...
The Deputy Presiding Officer LD
I can give you the time back, Colin Smyth. However, interventions should generally be brief.
Colin Smyth Lab
The Labour budget delivers extra funding for our public services, which the SNP has made clear that it opposes. Kevin Stewart’s claim about the SNP’s record ...
Finlay Carson Con
When it comes to the economics of the madhouse, does the member think that the attack on family farms will put additional burdens on low-income families by i...
Colin Smyth Lab
The challenge that the Tories have is that, if they want to oppose every change in inheritance tax, they have to say where the funding shortfall will come fr...
Clare Haughey (Rutherglen) (SNP) SNP
On a point of order, Presiding Officer. I am offended by the language that Finlay Carson just used and I ask him to withdraw his comment about the “economics...