Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
14
Parties on record
2,095,827
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,095,827 contributions in session S6, 11 May 2026 – 10 Jun 2026. Latest 30 days: 2,655. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 09 Jun 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament 02 October 2024

02 Oct 2024 · S6 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Medical Aesthetics Industry
Mackay, Gillian Green Central Scotland Watch on SPTV

This debate is an important one, and I thank Stuart McMillan for raising the issue in the chamber.

The current situation with regard to the regulation of the medical aesthetics industry in Scotland is untenable. As of today, there are no laws on who can offer such treatments, yet the number of complaints about botched procedures carried out by people with no medical qualifications or in dangerous environments is rising exponentially.

I, along with others, welcome the recent announcement by the Minister for Public Health and Women’s Health that the Scottish Government will launch a consultation later this year to explore legislative proposals to regulate the sector, and I welcome, too, its commitment to doing so within the current parliamentary session. However, although I commend the Government for its position, it is vital that the consultation is followed by robust and swift action.

In the debate, and in conversations around this issue, we should ensure that we never shame or blame those who have sought these procedures.

From 17 January to 30 June 2020, the Scottish Government ran a public consultation on the further regulation of non-surgical cosmetic procedures and proposals to introduce a licensing scheme, and I want to take a moment to highlight the results of that consultation. The consultation report revealed almost overwhelming support for change. Most respondents believed that non-surgical cosmetic procedures should be conducted only by trained, qualified and regulated healthcare professionals, and they also stressed that the physical, psychological or financial risks of allowing unqualified individuals to perform these procedures were far too great. In addition to those views from wider members of the public, regulatory bodies and organisations were calling—and, indeed, continue to call—for more oversight through stricter regulation and/or a comprehensive licensing scheme.

The UK Health and Care Act 2022 introduced enabling powers to establish a licensing scheme for non-surgical cosmetic providers in England. When we look at the experience south of the border, we see that only a small number of local authorities in London, Birmingham and Essex operate their own cosmetic licensing schemes, and they vary in the number and types of treatment that they cover. That said, there are things that we can learn from those schemes when we come to design our own.

For a start, the regulations created under these powers include two separate licences; the powers prohibit people in England from carrying out specified cosmetic procedures in the course of business unless they hold a personal licence and from using or allowing the use of premises for the provision of such procedures unless they have a premises licence. The 2022 act also specifies the high-level categories of cosmetic procedure that will be covered by the licensing scheme, and I believe that we should also set basic standards for training and competencies.

The Scottish Government has previously committed to working with other UK nations on developing proposals for Scotland, and I strongly believe that that is the right path to follow if we are to establish a coherent and robust system for the benefit of the people in Scotland as well as learn from the experiences of other jurisdictions.

Several constituents who are worried about the situation have reached out to me—as others have— and have asked for the matter to be taken seriously and for something to be done urgently. I hope that, in shedding light on some of the dangers, today’s debate means that the Government continues to work to introduce regulations and to ensure and improve public safety. The evidence is clear that, without urgent action, we will continue to see unnecessary harm and further strain on our public health system. Our ultimate goal should be to ensure that all non-surgical cosmetic procedures carried out in Scotland are delivered in hygienic premises by appropriately trained practitioners who apply recognised standards and use legitimate products, and it is my belief that that can happen only through robust regulation.

17:56  

In the same item of business

The Deputy Presiding Officer (Annabelle Ewing) SNP
The final item of business is a members’ business debate on motion S6M-14436, in the name of Stuart McMillan, on regulation of the medical aesthetics industr...
Stuart McMillan (Greenock and Inverclyde) (SNP) SNP
I am pleased to lead this members’ business debate on the need for non-surgical medical aesthetics to be regulated. I have been highlighting the topic for se...
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
We move to the open debate. I remind members that speeches should be up to four minutes. I also remind those members who wish to speak in the debate to ensu...
Clare Haughey (Rutherglen) (SNP) SNP
I thank you, Presiding Officer, for giving me permission to leave the chamber before the end of the debate. I put on record my entry in the register of membe...
Sharon Dowey (South Scotland) (Con) Con
I thank Stuart McMillan for securing this debate on an important issue that is of real concern to many of my constituents. Concerns have been raised by medi...
Collette Stevenson (East Kilbride) (SNP) SNP
I am grateful to Stuart McMillan for securing the debate. I whole-heartedly support his motion. The demand for non-surgical aesthetic treatments such as Bot...
Foysol Choudhury (Lothian) (Lab) Lab
I thank the Presiding Officer for allowing me to leave the chamber before the debate finishes. I, too, congratulate Stuart McMillan on bringing this importa...
Colin Beattie (Midlothian North and Musselburgh) (SNP) SNP
I thank Stuart McMillan for bringing to the chamber his motion regarding the lack of regulation in the medical aesthetics industry in Scotland. That is a mat...
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
I call Gillian Mackay, who is joining us remotely, to be followed by Miles Briggs. 17:52
Gillian Mackay (Central Scotland) (Green) Green
This debate is an important one, and I thank Stuart McMillan for raising the issue in the chamber. The current situation with regard to the regulation of th...
Miles Briggs (Lothian) (Con) Con
I congratulate Stuart McMillan on securing this debate and welcome his constituent Jill Best to the public gallery, along with other campaigners who have joi...
The Minister for Public Health and Women’s Health (Jenni Minto) SNP
I, too, thank Stuart McMillan for bringing the debate to the chamber and for his continued interest in what is a very important subject. I am also hugely gra...
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
That concludes the debate. Meeting closed at 18:08.