Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
13
Parties on record
2,355,091
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,355,091 contributions in session S6, 16 Apr 2026 – 16 May 2026. Latest 30 days: 148. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 14 May 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament 28 May 2024

28 May 2024 · S6 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Visitor Levy (Scotland) Bill
Burgess, Ariane Green Highlands and Islands Watch on SPTV

I start by thanking the Parliament clerks, the clerks of the Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee, the bill team and all the stakeholders who joined us to help shape the bill. The debate has brought back memories of our visits to Orkney Islands Council and to Aviemore, where we spoke with representatives of Highland Council and other stakeholders.

The Scottish Greens are pleased to see the Visitor Levy (Scotland) Bill come to its final stage today, having secured its introduction during budget negotiations back in 2019. The approach—capturing for communities the benefits of Scotland’s global appeal—has been the norm in many of the world’s top tourist destinations for a long time.

It has been the long-standing position of the Scottish Greens that councils should have greater financial powers to raise their own revenues, as opposed to the current position, in which around two thirds of their budget comes from Scottish Government grant. We have some of the most centralised and least empowered local government on our continent, but that is gradually changing.

The visitor levy power is an important part of a much wider set of empowerment measures and must be joined, as soon as possible, by a cruise ship levy—a move that will be of particular benefit to the island councils in my region, and which was announced by the Greens last year. Greens’ proposals for a cruise ship levy are linked to emissions, so that the biggest and most-polluting boats would pay more. Our island constituents deserve our full consideration of all such issues, and that can be done only through stand-alone legislation.

We are incredibly fortunate that Scotland is such an attractive destination for visitors, whether they come from abroad or from the rest of the UK, or it is our residents choosing to explore and enjoy their own country for their holidays. Nowhere is that more true than in my region. From Shetland to Speyside and from Skye to the small isles, that is great for our economy, especially in fragile rural communities, although it also puts huge pressure on rural communities, the natural environment and public services. Rarely does a summer season go by without local—and often national—headlines about inconsiderate or even dangerous parking, antisocial behaviour and litter on the north coast 500. Clearly, that is from a small minority of visitors, not all of whom will be staying overnight. However, such things put pressure on council services, so it is only fair that local residents do not pick up the bill.

Tax is one way in which we all contribute to building a better world for our communities. I am proud that the Scottish Greens are honest about the need for a fairer tax system if we want better public services. We have already secured big changes, including raising income tax on the highest earners, raising tax on the purchase of second and holiday homes, doubling council tax on holiday homes and the increasing range of new local powers such as the visitor levy, the cruise ship levy to come and the infrastructure levy on big developers. By diversifying our tax base, we can empower communities to deliver on their local priorities and have real control.

There are a few themes from the evidence that I have heard during the progress of the bill that I would like to highlight. The first concerns the 18-month gap before a scheme can be introduced. The Convention of Scottish Local Authorities made it clear that that length of time is clearly disproportionate and excessive, so we need to reflect on that.

The second theme is the scope for spending the funds that will be raised. Many hospitality businesses in rural communities are struggling to fill vacancies, which are caused in large part by local housing shortages. During the committee’s debate on the matter at stage 2, the minister was clear that the funds that will be raised through the levy could be spent on housing and regeneration, both of which support the wider economy on which the tourism industry relies. It is vital that councils retain the flexibility to do that, so I remind the minister of his words to the effect that local authorities will want to use the funding in a way that best supports their local visitor economy. Such support could include relevant regeneration and, potentially, support for affordable housing projects.

The bill is just one of many measures that are required to empower local councils, but it is one that the Scottish Greens are proud to support.

In the same item of business

The Deputy Presiding Officer (Annabelle Ewing) SNP
As members will be aware, at this point in the proceedings the Presiding Officer is required under standing orders to decide whether, in her view, any provis...
The Cabinet Secretary for Finance and Local Government (Shona Robison) SNP
For the purposes of rule 9.11 of standing orders, I advise Parliament that His Majesty, having been informed of the purport of the Visitor Levy (Scotland) Bi...
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
The next item of business is a debate on motion S6M-13349, in the name of Tom Arthur, on the Visitor Levy (Scotland) Bill at stage 3. Members who wish to spe...
The Minister for Employment and Investment (Tom Arthur) SNP
Before I turn to the content of the bill, I thank members for the thoughtful and constructive way in which many of them have engaged with it as it has progre...
Daniel Johnson (Edinburgh Southern) (Lab) Lab
As per our interactions on the amendments, I think that the group is a good way of striking the balance. However, I wonder what will happen to the group once...
Tom Arthur SNP
I think that there is a need for on-going engagement. The point that Mr Johnson raises speaks to the importance of not only the review period in individual l...
Paul Sweeney (Glasgow) (Lab) Lab
I am curious as to whether the funds that are raised through the levy will have to be spent in the given financial year or whether there could be scope for a...
Tom Arthur SNP
The scheme sets out very clear requirements about objectives and very clear reporting requirements, including separate accounting for the levy that is raised...
Miles Briggs (Lothian) (Con) Con
I thank the Parliament’s clerks for the support that they provided me with during the passage of the bill—albeit that my amendments have perhaps not met with...
Finlay Carson (Galloway and West Dumfries) (Con) Con
Will the member take an intervention?
Miles Briggs Con
I do not know whether I have time.
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
Briefly, Mr Carson.
Finlay Carson Con
Does Mr Briggs agree that, by offering cheap camping holidays, businesses such as Loch Ken holiday park, Auchenlarie holiday park and Brighouse Bay holiday p...
Miles Briggs Con
That is why I lodged a set of amendments, working with the caravan and camping sector, which were intended to ensure that the sector would not be impacted by...
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
Mr Briggs, I have to ask you to conclude.
Miles Briggs Con
—to address the negative impacts on businesses and on the most vulnerable.
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
I call Mark Griffin to open on behalf of Scottish Labour. 17:50
Mark Griffin (Central Scotland) (Lab) Lab
I thank the Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee; the minister and his bill team; the Parliament’s legislation team; and all the organisations th...
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
I call on Ariane Burgess to open on behalf of the Scottish Greens. 17:55
Ariane Burgess (Highlands and Islands) (Green) Green
I start by thanking the Parliament clerks, the clerks of the Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee, the bill team and all the stakeholders who joi...
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
I call Liam McArthur to open on behalf of the Scottish Liberal Democrats. 17:59
Liam McArthur (Orkney Islands) (LD) LD
I join others in thanking the Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee and all those who gave evidence to it, including people in Orkney. I pay tribu...
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
We move to the open debate. 18:04
Willie Coffey (Kilmarnock and Irvine Valley) (SNP) SNP
I thank my fellow Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee members and colleagues for their detailed consideration of the Visitor Levy (Scotland) Bil...
Daniel Johnson (Edinburgh Southern) (Lab) Lab
Will the member take an intervention?
Willie Coffey SNP
I am sorry—I have four minutes. We have probably heard enough debate for the day and I can see that members are desperate to get home. Although I do not exp...
Pam Gosal (West Scotland) (Con) Con
I am grateful to be contributing to today’s stage 3 debate on the Visitor Levy (Scotland) Bill from the Scottish Conservative benches. I echo what was said e...
Daniel Johnson (Edinburgh Southern) (Lab) Lab
I, too, thank the Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee and its clerks for their work through stages 1 and 2. I also highlight the way in which th...
Ross Greer (West Scotland) (Green) Green
It has been about five years since the Scottish Greens first secured a commitment to the bill’s being introduced. That happened as part of annual budget nego...
Michael Marra (North East Scotland) (Lab) Lab
Scottish Labour welcomes the completion of the bill process and giving local authorities the power to implement levies to help to pay for services to support...