Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
13
Parties on record
2,355,091
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,355,091 contributions in session S6, 16 Apr 2026 – 16 May 2026. Latest 30 days: 148. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 14 May 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament 28 May 2024

28 May 2024 · S6 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Visitor Levy (Scotland) Bill
Griffin, Mark Lab Central Scotland Watch on SPTV

I thank the Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee; the minister and his bill team; the Parliament’s legislation team; and all the organisations that have given evidence to shape the bill that we have before us.

For the best part of a decade, we in Scottish Labour have called for a visitor levy. We are pleased to see that the Scottish Government has listened, and we are happy to support the passage of the bill at stage 3. We believe that local authorities should have as much control as possible over the implementation of the levy, simply because that reflects our commitment to push power out to local communities.

The visitor levy is a particularly good example of where that approach works, given the diversity of Scotland’s tourism sector. Some local authority areas are much more frequently visited than others, which are likely to see potentially negligible returns from any levy. We welcome the flexibilities in the bill that allow councils to implement a levy if they so choose and to design it in a way that suits their local circumstances, in consultation with relevant stakeholders.

Throughout the passage of the bill, the committee and other interested parties have attempted to balance support for local government with maintaining economic growth and supporting sustainable tourism. It is clear that the tourism and hospitality sector has faced significant difficulties over recent years, with the Covid-19 pandemic and the associated lockdowns and the subsequent cost of living crisis. The committee came to the view that the levy “would be unlikely to” deter visitors. We agreed that a small additional fee on top of accommodation costs is seen as part of the normal tourist experience in many other countries and could help to ameliorate the potential negative consequences for communities when tourism becomes unsustainable.

While we support the levy, however, we have said that implementation must not place too great a burden on businesses or local authorities. In particular, we are keen to ensure that smaller businesses are not disproportionately affected by the application of any future levies that are decided locally. The levy will be a shot in the arm to hard-pressed local authorities that are currently struggling with the pressure on local services that is brought about by large numbers of visitors. Crucially, however, revenue must not be used to replace funding for core local services. For more than a decade, Scottish local authorities have seen their budgets stripped to the bone, which has left libraries closed, rubbish uncollected and services for some of our most vulnerable people shut down and never reopened. The levy cannot be a substitute for money lost due to a reduction in the general revenue grant to local authorities, and it cannot be about plugging a gap.

Accounts Commission figures show that between 2010-11 and 2021-22, revenue expenditure on culture and leisure fell by 23.6 per cent; spending on roads dropped by 16.1 per cent; and spending on environmental services dropped by 12.8 per cent. In the face of those swingeing cuts over which this Government has presided, any revenue that is raised must be used to improve the tourism offer, and the services that tourists appreciate and for which they visit Scotland.

The levy, while it is welcome, will not touch the sides of the £6 billion black hole that the Government has created in local budgets, and the Government cannot pretend that it will act as a replacement for the fair core funding settlement that communities need. Scottish Labour has a different vision for local government that will guarantee a fair funding settlement and protect vital local decision making so that local people have a say over the services that affect their day-to-day lives most.

We also see tourism as a key part of our wider business case for Scotland, where it encourages economic growth through the promotion of brand Scotland and by ensuring that our country becomes a vital destination for business and leisure travellers. The visitor levy forms a key part of our commitment to implementing a new tourism strategy that builds cultural links with key markets and develops brand Scotland’s reputation on a global stage. We have proposed similar levies in previous manifestos. We have identified that such a levy could be a key part of the fiscal framework and the democratic accountability of local authorities. For those reasons, we will support the bill at decision time.

In the same item of business

The Deputy Presiding Officer (Annabelle Ewing) SNP
As members will be aware, at this point in the proceedings the Presiding Officer is required under standing orders to decide whether, in her view, any provis...
The Cabinet Secretary for Finance and Local Government (Shona Robison) SNP
For the purposes of rule 9.11 of standing orders, I advise Parliament that His Majesty, having been informed of the purport of the Visitor Levy (Scotland) Bi...
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
The next item of business is a debate on motion S6M-13349, in the name of Tom Arthur, on the Visitor Levy (Scotland) Bill at stage 3. Members who wish to spe...
The Minister for Employment and Investment (Tom Arthur) SNP
Before I turn to the content of the bill, I thank members for the thoughtful and constructive way in which many of them have engaged with it as it has progre...
Daniel Johnson (Edinburgh Southern) (Lab) Lab
As per our interactions on the amendments, I think that the group is a good way of striking the balance. However, I wonder what will happen to the group once...
Tom Arthur SNP
I think that there is a need for on-going engagement. The point that Mr Johnson raises speaks to the importance of not only the review period in individual l...
Paul Sweeney (Glasgow) (Lab) Lab
I am curious as to whether the funds that are raised through the levy will have to be spent in the given financial year or whether there could be scope for a...
Tom Arthur SNP
The scheme sets out very clear requirements about objectives and very clear reporting requirements, including separate accounting for the levy that is raised...
Miles Briggs (Lothian) (Con) Con
I thank the Parliament’s clerks for the support that they provided me with during the passage of the bill—albeit that my amendments have perhaps not met with...
Finlay Carson (Galloway and West Dumfries) (Con) Con
Will the member take an intervention?
Miles Briggs Con
I do not know whether I have time.
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
Briefly, Mr Carson.
Finlay Carson Con
Does Mr Briggs agree that, by offering cheap camping holidays, businesses such as Loch Ken holiday park, Auchenlarie holiday park and Brighouse Bay holiday p...
Miles Briggs Con
That is why I lodged a set of amendments, working with the caravan and camping sector, which were intended to ensure that the sector would not be impacted by...
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
Mr Briggs, I have to ask you to conclude.
Miles Briggs Con
—to address the negative impacts on businesses and on the most vulnerable.
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
I call Mark Griffin to open on behalf of Scottish Labour. 17:50
Mark Griffin (Central Scotland) (Lab) Lab
I thank the Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee; the minister and his bill team; the Parliament’s legislation team; and all the organisations th...
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
I call on Ariane Burgess to open on behalf of the Scottish Greens. 17:55
Ariane Burgess (Highlands and Islands) (Green) Green
I start by thanking the Parliament clerks, the clerks of the Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee, the bill team and all the stakeholders who joi...
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
I call Liam McArthur to open on behalf of the Scottish Liberal Democrats. 17:59
Liam McArthur (Orkney Islands) (LD) LD
I join others in thanking the Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee and all those who gave evidence to it, including people in Orkney. I pay tribu...
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
We move to the open debate. 18:04
Willie Coffey (Kilmarnock and Irvine Valley) (SNP) SNP
I thank my fellow Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee members and colleagues for their detailed consideration of the Visitor Levy (Scotland) Bil...
Daniel Johnson (Edinburgh Southern) (Lab) Lab
Will the member take an intervention?
Willie Coffey SNP
I am sorry—I have four minutes. We have probably heard enough debate for the day and I can see that members are desperate to get home. Although I do not exp...
Pam Gosal (West Scotland) (Con) Con
I am grateful to be contributing to today’s stage 3 debate on the Visitor Levy (Scotland) Bill from the Scottish Conservative benches. I echo what was said e...
Daniel Johnson (Edinburgh Southern) (Lab) Lab
I, too, thank the Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee and its clerks for their work through stages 1 and 2. I also highlight the way in which th...
Ross Greer (West Scotland) (Green) Green
It has been about five years since the Scottish Greens first secured a commitment to the bill’s being introduced. That happened as part of annual budget nego...
Michael Marra (North East Scotland) (Lab) Lab
Scottish Labour welcomes the completion of the bill process and giving local authorities the power to implement levies to help to pay for services to support...