Committee
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee 01 May 2024
01 May 2024 · S6 · Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Item of business
Continued Petitions
A832 (Adoption as Trunk Road) (PE1980)
I do not think that there is anything further that we can do. I have much sympathy with the points that Rhoda Grant made about the practical difficulties that Highland people face in general. There has been no suggestion of a solution. I am not sure that Network Rail is likely to provide an answer, although I am sure that Rhoda Grant can take that up. Our experience in writing to Network Rail is that you do so more in hope than expectation, simply because its budget is committed for a long period in advance in respect of existing programmes, as is the roads budget. I do not see that there is much more that the committee can do, other than to close the petitions under rule 15.7 of standing orders, on the basis that the Scottish Government has said that there are no current plans to undertake a formal review of the trunk road network. The Scottish Government does not consider that the A890 and the A832 “meet the criteria to be incorporated into the strategic motorway and trunk road network”. The Scottish Government has said that local roads are considered to be out of scope “unless they provided direct access to a major ... airport; linked to a nationally significant National Planning Framework 4 (NPF4) development site; or where a local road intersected a trunk road where bus priority or active travel measures were proposed.” It is the Government’s view that the “Principal A Class roads are best managed locally rather than centrally” and that the A890 and A832 belong in that category “as main roads which distribute traffic to and from the strategic trunk road network.” I am merely stating the Scottish Government’s position. My view is that we need to do far more, as Rhoda Grant has rightly said, and that other methods of funding should be considered. I agree with that. My last comment, perhaps in the light of the departure of two ministers from office last week, is that, with regard to overall priorities, we could spend more of the £60 billion of expenditure that we have in Scotland on upgrading roads. After all, unless you are a Tour de France cyclist, active travel on a bike is not really much use for the situations that Rhoda Grant described. However, that is perhaps a topic for another day.
In the same item of business
The Convener
Con
Our next petitions, which were lodged by Derek Noble, are coupled. PE1974 calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to adopt the A890 ...
Rhoda Grant (Highlands and Islands) (Lab)
Lab
I am grateful to the committee for giving me the opportunity to speak, and I am grateful to Derek Noble for pursuing PE1974. I share the committee’s disappo...
The Convener
Con
Thank you. You make a very powerful case in respect of the petitioner and the aims of his petitions. The issue that the committee must wrestle with is the—as...
Fergus Ewing
SNP
I do not think that there is anything further that we can do. I have much sympathy with the points that Rhoda Grant made about the practical difficulties tha...
Foysol Choudhury (Lothian) (Lab)
Lab
That was a powerful presentation from Rhoda Grant. Can we ask the Scottish Government whether it will work with local authorities, because so many hours are ...
The Convener
Con
I was going to suggest that, if we take forward Mr Ewing’s proposal to close the petitions, we couple that with writing to the Scottish Government to, as wel...
Foysol Choudhury
Lab
If we close the petitions, we will be saying to the Government that the matter is closed. We will not be giving the Government the option to look at the poss...
The Convener
Con
The Government has given a clear direction on its position. As a committee, we have to be satisfied that we have a realistic opportunity to advance matters. ...