Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
13
Parties on record
2,355,091
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,355,091 contributions in session S6, 16 Apr 2026 – 16 May 2026. Latest 30 days: 148. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 14 May 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Committee

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee 07 February 2024

07 Feb 2024 · S6 · Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Item of business
Wildlife Management and Muirburn (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
Mountain, Edward Con Highlands and Islands Watch on SPTV
I am pleased to be here to speak to my amendments. Before I do so, I will make a full declaration of my interests, so that people are aware of them. I have attended the committee before, but I would like to reiterate my interests. I am a member of a family farming partnership and a joint owner of a wild fishery. Both roles require the controlling of some species of wildlife, including stoats, weasels, mink, rats, mice, foxes and corvids, including crows, rooks and jackdaws. I have been controlling and managing wildlife to manage environments for more than 40 years. I use licensed firearms and spring traps. I make it clear that I do not own any hill ground, but I have been involved for more than 40 years in muirburn and burning to manage grassland and farmland and protect it from invasive species such as gorse and broom. In the past, I have supervised muirburn and have contributed to muirburn consultations and management plans. I hope that what I have said is sufficient for the committee to understand that I have an interest. I will speak to amendments 176 and 5 to 7. The point of amendment 176 is to allow the use of glue traps in certain environments—educational, catering and medical facilities. I have met the minister to discuss the issue, and I am grateful for the time that she gave me. I am unclear about how she is going to progress things, because I am not clear on what effect the United Kingdom Internal Market Act 2020 could have on the banning of glue traps, but, on the basis that the ban might well continue, I am keen for glue traps to continue to be able to be used in tightly controlled circumstances—in, as I said, educational, catering and medical facilities. Amendment 5 sets out that the use of such traps would be subject to having a glue trap licence. That is really important. Amendments 6 and 7 set out that a glue trap licence can be issued only to a pest controller who is engaged in “preserving public health or public safety”. That is also important. I have suggested some safeguards in relation to the licence. A licence should not be granted unless there is no other solution, and the person must have taken a course. The licence would also be time limited. A fee for the licence could be charged by the Scottish Government, which would be responsible for overseeing the licensing scheme. It seems to me that what I have proposed is a sensible option to ensure that glue traps are used only when they are needed. Rats and mice often get into catering establishments, and it is really important that we get rid of them as soon as possible, in the same way as we would want to get rid of them if they were in our accommodation. However, it is especially important in relation to food. The only way of ensuring that is to use a glue trap. I know from personal experience that you can set snap traps for vermin such as rats and mice, but they can become trap shy, and some of them are pretty clever. You can be clever, too, by using chocolate and apples, but that does not always attract them to the trap. However, if you put a glue trap in the right place, you can get rid of them overnight, and that gives you confidence that the animals have been removed. I do not see any reason why that should not be allowed, especially if the glue traps are set and checked within a set period. I think that that is a humane way of doing it. Amendment 106 clarifies that the amendment is about traps that restrain animals. Amendments 107 and 108 introduce vicarious liability, which I do not believe is needed if we limit the control of where glue traps can be used. I look forward to the debate and hearing the arguments on either side. I am interested in hearing about the other amendments in the group. I move amendment 176.

In the same item of business

The Convener (Finlay Carson) Con
Good morning, and welcome to the fourth meeting in 2024 of the Rural Affairs and Islands Committee. I remind all those members who are using electronic devic...
The Convener Con
Amendment 176, in the name of Edward Mountain, is grouped with amendments 106, 4, 107, 108 and 5 to 7.
Edward Mountain (Highlands and Islands) (Con) Con
I am pleased to be here to speak to my amendments. Before I do so, I will make a full declaration of my interests, so that people are aware of them. I have a...
Colin Smyth (South Scotland) (Lab) Lab
Amendment 106 relates to the wording of the offence of using a glue trap in section 1 of the bill. A glue trap, as we know, is intended as a restraining trap...
Ariane Burgess (Highlands and Islands) (Green) Green
I put on the record my sympathy for the intention behind Colin Smyth’s amendments 107 and 108. Glue traps are inhumane and indiscriminate as a pest control t...
The Minister for Energy and the Environment (Gillian Martin) SNP
Edward Mountain’s amendment 176 would allow members of the public to use glue traps to control rats and mice in educational, catering or medical premises. Th...
The Convener Con
I call Edward Mountain to wind up and indicate whether he wishes to press or withdraw amendment 176.
Edward Mountain Con
In some ways, I am actually encouraged by what I have heard this morning, but I would still like to make a few comments in response to what the minister has ...
The Convener Con
Would you like to comment, minister?
Gillian Martin SNP
I think that I have made it clear that I am sympathetic to the argument that there might be some settings where we cannot have an infestation and where pest ...
Edward Mountain Con
On that basis, with the hope that there is light at the end of the tunnel, I am prepared to work with the minister to see if my amendments can be reviewed to...
Colin Smyth Lab
I am grateful to the minister for her clarity on the definition of “taking” and for the offer to include further information in the explanatory notes. On tha...
Edward Mountain Con
I will not move amendment 4 on the basis of my earlier explanation. Amendment 4 not moved.
Colin Smyth Lab
I am grateful to the minister for the offer to work on a possible amendment at stage 3 on the issue covered by amendment 107. On that basis, I will not move ...
Edward Mountain Con
I will not move amendment 5 for the reasons that I gave earlier. Amendment 5 not moved. Section 2 agreed to. After section 2
Edward Mountain Con
I am looking forward to fruitful discussions with the minister. Therefore, I am not moving amendments 6 or 7. Amendments 6 and 7 not moved. Section 3 agree...
The Convener Con
Amendment 54, in the name of the minister, is grouped with amendments 54A, 54B, 54C, 54D, 54E, 54F, 54G, 54H, 54I and 54J.
Gillian Martin SNP
My amendment 54 seeks to introduce a comprehensive ban on the use of snares, as is recommended by the Scottish Animal Welfare Commission. The amendment intro...
Rachael Hamilton (Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire) (Con) Con
Will the minister take an intervention?
Gillian Martin SNP
Can I finish my points?
Rachael Hamilton Con
Yes—sorry. I thought that you had not heard me.
Gillian Martin SNP
You never know; perhaps I will cover what it is you want to raise, so let me get to the end of my rationale for this.
Rachael Hamilton Con
My intervention was about a previous issue.
Gillian Martin SNP
In my view, although humane cable restraints might be an incremental improvement on the traditional style of snare, they do not lead to a significant reducti...
Rachael Hamilton Con
It is on a previous point, minister. Thank you for taking the intervention. You talked about the ban on snares in Wales, but the fact is that Welsh minister...
Gillian Martin SNP
Ms Hamilton mentioned a challenge, but there is always the risk of a challenge to any legislation that goes through a Parliament. People are free to challeng...
Rachael Hamilton Con
Can I get clarification specifically on that?
Gillian Martin SNP
Convener, I would like to go on and discuss the amendments in Colin Smyth’s name, because I think that I have answered Rachael Hamilton’s points.
The Convener Con
Yes. Rachael, you will have an opportunity to come in when I call for general views from members.
Rachael Hamilton Con
Thank you, convener.