Committee
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee 06 March 2024
06 Mar 2024 · S6 · Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Item of business
Continued Petitions
A82 Upgrade (PE1967)
I respectfully agree that I do not think that a site visit is required or that we should take oral evidence from Transport Scotland. However, there appears to be a slight conflict in the evidence on exactly what analysis Transport Scotland has carried out on the apparent high road option. My impression on rereading the correspondence and submissions is that Transport Scotland has carried out some analytical work on the option and has concluded that it is not practical. I think that clarification of that in a letter would be very useful. I would also like Transport Scotland to confirm how much a STAG report would cost, how long it would take and whether it thinks that it might delay the project further. Despite the objections that the petitioners have very sincerely set out, the fact is that a far greater number of people on the west coast—in Oban and Fort William—use this route as their link with the world and the Tarbet to Inverarnan stretch is arguably the worst section of an A-road in Scotland. There are routinely accidents, delays, damage to wing mirrors and so on, and I think that many people feel anxious about driving that section, as I did for many years when I represented Lochaber. A huge number of people want the A82 to become a proper road, so, while respecting the petitioner’s wishes, I think that it is useful to put that on the record out of a sense of balance.
In the same item of business
The Convener
Con
PE1967, on protecting Loch Lomond’s Atlantic oakwood shoreline by implementing the high road option for the A82 upgrade between Tarbet and Inverarnan, was lo...
Foysol Choudhury
Lab
I suggest that we write to the Cabinet Secretary for Transport, seeking further details on the anticipated timetable for progressing the draft road orders an...
The Convener
Con
In the first instance, I would write quite specifically to Transport Scotland on that issue instead of bringing it before the committee. I do not think that ...
Fergus Ewing
SNP
I respectfully agree that I do not think that a site visit is required or that we should take oral evidence from Transport Scotland. However, there appears t...
The Convener
Con
Are we content to proceed on that basis? Members indicated agreement.
The Convener
Con
Mr Ewing, you are showing your age when you talk about wing mirrors—it is more likely to be door mirrors these days. It has been some time since wing mirrors...