Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
14
Parties on record
2,095,827
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,095,827 contributions in session S6, 12 May 2026 – 11 Jun 2026. Latest 30 days: 3,026. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 10 Jun 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Committee

Education, Children and Young People Committee 07 February 2024

07 Feb 2024 · S6 · Education, Children and Young People Committee
Item of business
Children (Care and Justice) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
Don-Innes, Natalie SNP Renfrewshire North and West Watch on SPTV
I thank Ross Greer and Miles Briggs for lodging their amendments. Secure transport of children is a very important matter, and a range of work is on-going in that area. As Ross Greer mentioned, the Government has worked with him on amendment 212, which has been carefully framed to take account of wider matters. It is envisaged that the standards that ministers would be obliged to publish and report on would draw heavily on the service specification that the Scottish Government and the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities have produced. The committee heard about that at stage 1; however, it is not mandatory. Amendment 212 would therefore allow for a set of national standards to which all those who commission secure transport must adhere. The service specification prohibits use of mechanical restraint, handcuffs or pain-inducing techniques. Careful consideration will be given to the issue before ministers produce the standards. We are aware that, as has been discussed this morning, restraint might be required as an option in a very small number of cases, as a last resort, either to protect a child or to protect those who transport them. The alternative might be the police being called, which would bring a criminal justice response. On the subject of a national regulator, we have noted the concerns that were raised by the Care Inspectorate in its evidence, regarding its role and remit. However, I assure the committee that discussions on that are on-going. I cannot pre-empt them, but I reassure the committee and other members that existing legislative provision enables the functions of registering, regulating and inspecting secure transport services to be conferred on the Care Inspectorate. Although I am not saying that that is the direction in which things will certainly go, it is useful information in the context of the window of opportunity that is presented by the bill. In addition, my officials continue to work with relevant agencies on a national contract that would standardise matters related to providers and provide an approach for across Scotland. I commend Miles Briggs for raising those matters in his amendment 162. He has said that he will not move the amendment, so I will not go into detail. Mr Briggs also referred to data collection. I would be happy to have a discussion with him on any gaps that he feels there are in relation to production of the standards. In summary, I support amendment 212 and I ask the committee to do likewise.

In the same item of business

The Convener (Sue Webber) Con
Good morning, and welcome to the fifth meeting in 2024 of the Education, Children and Young People Committee. The first item on our agenda is day 3 of our co...
The Convener Con
The question is, that amendment 210 be agreed to. Are we agreed? Members: No.
The Convener Con
There will be a division. For Duncan-Glancy, Pam (Glasgow) (Lab) Kerr, Liam (North East Scotland) (Con) Rennie, Willie (North East Fife) (LD) Webber, Su...
The Convener Con
The result of the division is: For 4, Against 5, Abstentions 0. Amendment 210 disagreed to. Amendment 211 moved—Pam Duncan-Glancy.
The Convener Con
The question is, that amendment 211 be agreed to. Are we agreed? Members: No.
The Convener Con
There will be a division. For Duncan-Glancy, Pam (Glasgow) (Lab) Kerr, Liam (North East Scotland) (Con) Rennie, Willie (North East Fife) (LD) Webber, Su...
The Convener Con
The result of the division is: For 4, Against 5, Abstentions 0. Amendment 211 disagreed to.
The Convener Con
The first group of amendments is on secure transportation. Amendment 212, in the name of Ross Greer, is grouped with amendments 162 and 163.
Ross Greer (West Scotland) (Green) Green
I thank the “Hope instead of handcuffs” campaign, the minister and her officials for their help with amendment 212. It was a bit of a revelation to all comm...
Martin Whitfield (South Scotland) (Lab) Lab
Is proposed new section 90B expected to extend to transportation of young people by justice services? I am not talking about transportation between secure ac...
Ross Greer Green
My expectation is that the provision would cover all providers of secure transport for young people. That is a long-winded way of saying yes—I believe that i...
Willie Rennie (North East Fife) (LD) LD
I realise that the issue that I am about to raise would probably be for the regulation stage. Some people argue that restraint should almost be excluded com...
Ross Greer Green
I have a lot of sympathy with those who wish restraint to be eliminated from the system completely. I think that we all want a system in which there are no s...
Miles Briggs (Lothian) (Con) Con
Good morning to members, the minister and her officials. I, too, have been working with the “Hope instead of handcuffs” campaign over a number of years on ho...
The Minister for Children, Young People and Keeping the Promise (Natalie Don) SNP
I thank Ross Greer and Miles Briggs for lodging their amendments. Secure transport of children is a very important matter, and a range of work is on-going in...
Ross Greer Green
I welcome the minister’s commitment to Miles Briggs to look more at data collection. Mr Briggs and the Children and Young People’s Commissioner Scotland have...
The Convener Con
Section 23 is on secure accommodation. Amendment 108, in the name of Roz McCall, is grouped with amendments 109, 221, 155, 156, 110, 111, 213 and 157 to 161.
Roz McCall (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Con) Con
Amendments 108 and 109 are probing amendments, and they follow on from other amendments that have been lodged and discussed. They are on concerns about separ...
The Convener Con
Now, breaking with tradition, I call myself, Sue Webber, to speak to an amendment in my name. Amendment 221, which I lodged after last week’s committee meet...
Miles Briggs Con
I start by paying tribute to and thanking a number of people who have helped to shape my amendments: Beth Morrison and her son, Calum, who have been working ...
Natalie Don SNP
I understand that some committee members, in their scrutiny of the bill, have highlighted concerns about children who have committed an offence being placed ...
Michelle Thomson (Falkirk East) (SNP) SNP
We have had some discussions with the Government around the nature of risk. I made an observation on that when we were going through the Gender Recognition R...
Natalie Don SNP
I certainly can provide those reassurances. I will be getting on to some of those matters, which are covered in my notes. I will get back to those, but I wil...
Pam Duncan-Glancy (Glasgow) (Lab) Lab
My understanding is that the Care Inspectorate guidelines would prevent the sharing of spaces in the way that the minister has described. To build on Michel...
Natalie Don SNP
I have not personally discussed the issue with the Care Inspectorate, but those conversations have taken place at official level. In the light of committee c...
The Convener Con
I am curious to know what is in the wording of my amendment that would preclude your supporting it when you have said at length that a ministerial process is...
Natalie Don SNP
The wording does not necessarily describe the behaviour.
The Convener Con
The behaviour is rather irrelevant when I say that it is about a child who has caused harm and a child who has been harmed. Making a descriptor of behaviour ...
Natalie Don SNP
Our issue is about the definition of the offence. Behaviour is not necessarily negative. The amendment would not be workable in law, essentially. I am happy ...
The Convener Con
The amendment says that it is about offence or behaviour.