Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
13
Parties on record
2,355,091
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,355,091 contributions in session S6, 16 Apr 2026 – 16 May 2026. Latest 30 days: 148. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 14 May 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament 25 January 2024

25 Jan 2024 · S6 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Technology

I am delighted to begin the Scottish Conservatives’ contribution to this important debate. Any day when I get to quote the science fiction author Arthur C Clarke is a good day. Clarke wrote three laws about the future, the most famous of which was:

“Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.”

He wrote that in 1968, at a time when many people believed that, by now, we would have colonised space, cured hunger and ended disease. Well, we could not accuse them of being unambitious. However, if the author were here today, would he see the technology that we possess now as magical? Would he recognise that same technological ambition in us today?

Since Arthur C Clarke’s time, we have transformed the way in which we live and work. The warehouse-sized computers that helped to put man on the moon can now be vastly outperformed by the smartphones in our pockets or even the smartwatches on our wrists. In every sphere of life, from education and health to engineering and business, new technologies have transformed how we live and work.

As the Government’s motion alludes to, Scotland has achieved a great deal as a technological nation—our technologies have been groundbreaking and transformative. However, as the Scottish Conservative amendment seeks to point out, our past achievements are no guarantee of future success. At a time when the pace of change in technology continues to accelerate and whole new fields of research are in development, we should be laying the foundations of future success. Instead, we have a Scottish Government that does not just lack focus on long-term gains; in some cases, it takes decisions that actively harm such gains.

The coming years will see dramatic changes to our economy and society as a whole. Technologies such as artificial intelligence, synthetic biology and zero carbon energy all have the potential to radically alter our lives, and the Scottish Government and this Parliament should constantly be considering how that could and should impact policy making.

The Scottish Government has not completely failed to recognise the need for change. The Scottish technology ecosystem review, which was led by Mark Logan—and commissioned by Kate Forbes back when Scottish National Party plans for the future extended beyond the Scottish Green Party manifesto—offered more than 30 recommendations to support more start-ups and scale-ups in the technology sector, which the Scottish Government duly accepted. However, the report examined only part of the picture, at best, and, despite being published in August 2020, it was written at a time when the arrival of AI felt more distant than it does today.

In the same item of business

The Deputy Presiding Officer (Annabelle Ewing) SNP
The next item of business is a debate on motion S6M-11958, in the name of Richard Lochhead, on Scotland as a technology nation. I invite members who wish to ...
The Minister for Small Business, Innovation, Tourism and Trade (Richard Lochhead) SNP
Today, as we celebrate the contribution of Rabbie Burns to the world, in this debate we can celebrate and discuss Scotland’s contribution to the world as a t...
Daniel Johnson (Edinburgh Southern) (Lab) Lab
It is interesting to note that the minister highlights both pure technology and its applications. Do we need greater clarity on the fact that tech is not jus...
Richard Lochhead SNP
There is an element of truth in the member’s point, and it is an important point in the debate, but I hope that, as my remarks progress, I can give the membe...
Brian Whittle (South Scotland) (Con) Con
Scotland has always been very good at innovation and early-stage advanced technology. However, we have not been so good at taking that to the next level. Wha...
Richard Lochhead SNP
The member raises an issue that is very topical and pertinent to the debate. Of course, at the moment, there is a huge amount of activity in Scotland, with l...
Ivan McKee SNP
Will the minister take an intervention?
Richard Lochhead SNP
I will take a final intervention.
Ivan McKee SNP
I think that the minister knows what I am going to say. It is great to highlight that infrastructure that is in place, but how does that align with the Gover...
Richard Lochhead SNP
As the member knows, the Scottish Funding Council carried out a review—at arm’s length from Government—of long-term funding for innovation centres. A lot of ...
Pam Duncan-Glancy (Glasgow) (Lab) Lab
Will the minister take an intervention?
Richard Lochhead SNP
I am happy to do so if I can get the time back.
Pam Duncan-Glancy Lab
Given the point that the minister just made about universities, is he concerned by the £28 million cut that they are facing this year?
Richard Lochhead SNP
The universities have received more than £1 billion from the Government per year for the past number of years. I am concerned about the very difficult budget...
Jamie Halcro Johnston (Highlands and Islands) (Con) Con
Will the minister take a quick intervention?
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
There is time, minister.
Richard Lochhead SNP
I will take the intervention.
Jamie Halcro Johnston Con
I declare an interest in relation to farming. The minister has not mentioned some of the technology around agriculture. Gene editing is a real opportunity f...
Richard Lochhead SNP
Agritech has a big role to play, and I am keen to learn more about it as part of our innovation strategy as we take it forward. At the same as we keep an ope...
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
As I indicated to the minister, there is some time in hand this afternoon. At this stage, we have plenty of time for interventions. 15:13
Brian Whittle (South Scotland) (Con) Con
I am delighted to begin the Scottish Conservatives’ contribution to this important debate. Any day when I get to quote the science fiction author Arthur C Cl...
Daniel Johnson Lab
Does Brian Whittle agree that the critical point with technology is that we always need to push ourselves further, that doing so is a constant challenge and ...
Brian Whittle Con
Daniel Johnson is absolutely correct. One of the things that we must do is stop looking at the short term. We must look beyond that, look at the possibilitie...
Daniel Johnson (Edinburgh Southern) (Lab) Lab
I will pick up where Brian Whittle left off, because the issue at hand is about challenge, what we need to achieve and the gap between what that means and wh...
Brian Whittle Con
I cannot agree more with what Daniel Johnson said. Does he agree that the issue, rather than being about teaching our kids technology—after all, the jobs of ...
Daniel Johnson Lab
I completely agree, but it is also important for them to apply technology to their work when they seek to do new things. We do not have enough of that and it...
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
Gentlemen, please do not speak across the chamber from a secondary position.
Daniel Johnson Lab
I am trying to bring a constructive challenge. There may be a wider point to make, but I am my party’s front-bench spokesperson for the economy and it is a c...
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
Minister, please refrain. I remind members that the person who has the floor is the person who gets the shot at speaking. Please continue, Mr Johnson.
Daniel Johnson Lab
There is a challenge for us all; I do not think that is a partisan point. If we are to deliver on the challenges of demography, climate change and all the ot...