Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
13
Parties on record
2,355,091
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,355,091 contributions in session S6, 16 Apr 2026 – 16 May 2026. Latest 30 days: 148. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 14 May 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament 10 January 2024

10 Jan 2024 · S6 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Decision Time

The result of the division is: For 89, Against 30, Abstentions 0.

Motion agreed to,

That the Parliament recognises the impact of UK Government asylum policy and legislation in Scotland, including the effect of the complex asylum system on people who have applied for protection, restrictions on the right to work and limited support available to people awaiting a decision, the increased reliance on contingency asylum accommodation caused by a backlog in Home Office decision-making, risks of maximisation policy and inadequate engagement with Scottish local authorities or public services prior to procurement of contingency accommodation, the streamlined asylum process and limited move-on period allowed once a decision has been made, and consequent impact on both newly-recognised refugees and local authorities, and the restricting of the right to seek asylum in the UK under the Illegal Migration Act 2023; is opposed to the UK Government’s pursuit of plans to relocate people to third countries to have asylum claims considered there; recognises the ruling of the Supreme Court in relation to the safety of Rwanda, and acknowledges the comments of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) that the Migration and Economic Development Partnership (MEDP) between the UK and Rwanda undermines the established international refugee protection system and that the UNHCR does not consider the MEDP to comply with the UK’s obligations under international law; notes the engagement of Scottish local authorities in asylum dispersal, and agrees that the UK Government needs to engage positively with devolved governments, local authorities and public services across asylum matters to reduce negative impacts on people, communities and services.

In the same item of business

The Presiding Officer (Alison Johnstone) NPA
There are four questions to be put as a result of today’s business. The first question is that amendment S6M-11803.1, in the name of Miles Briggs, which seek...
The Presiding Officer NPA
There will be a division. There will be a short suspension to allow members to access the digital voting system. 16:57 Meeting suspended. 16:59 On resuming—
The Presiding Officer NPA
We move to the division on amendment S6M-11803.1, in the name of Miles Briggs, which seeks to amend motion S6M-11803, in the name of Emma Roddick. Members sh...
Foysol Choudhury (Lothian) (Lab) Lab
On a point of order, Presiding Officer. My app was not working, but I would have voted no.
The Presiding Officer NPA
Thank you, Mr Choudhury. We will ensure that that is recorded.
James Dornan (Glasgow Cathcart) (SNP) SNP
On a point of order, Presiding Officer. My app was not working, but I would have voted no.
The Presiding Officer NPA
Thank you, Mr Dornan. We will ensure that that is recorded. For Balfour, Jeremy (Lothian) (Con) Briggs, Miles (Lothian) (Con) Burnett, Alexander (Aberdee...
The Presiding Officer NPA
The result of the division on amendment S6M-11803.1, in the name of Miles Briggs, is: For 30, Against 88, Abstentions 0. Amendment disagreed to.
The Presiding Officer NPA
The next question is, that motion S6M-11803.2, in the name of Paul O’Kane, which seeks to amend motion S6M-11803, in the name of Emma Roddick, on the impact ...
The Presiding Officer NPA
There will be a division. For Baker, Claire (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Lab) Bibby, Neil (West Scotland) (Lab) Boyack, Sarah (Lothian) (Lab) Choudhury, Foy...
The Presiding Officer NPA
The result of the division on amendment S6M-11803.2, in the name of Paul O’Kane, is: For 20, Against 97, Abstentions 0. Amendment disagreed to.
The Presiding Officer NPA
The question is, that motion S6M-11803, in the name of Emma Roddick, on the impact of UK Government asylum policy and legislation in Scotland, be agreed to. ...
The Presiding Officer NPA
There will be a division. For Adam, George (Paisley) (SNP) Adam, Karen (Banffshire and Buchan Coast) (SNP) Adamson, Clare (Motherwell and Wishaw) (SNP) ...
The Presiding Officer NPA
The result of the division is: For 89, Against 30, Abstentions 0. Motion agreed to, That the Parliament recognises the impact of UK Government asylum polic...
The Presiding Officer NPA
I propose to ask a single question on the three Parliamentary Bureau motions. Does any member object? As no member objects, the final question is that motio...
The Presiding Officer NPA
That concludes decision time.