Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
13
Parties on record
2,355,091
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,355,091 contributions in session S6, 16 Apr 2026 – 16 May 2026. Latest 30 days: 148. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 14 May 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament 20 December 2023

20 Dec 2023 · S6 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Proxy Voting

All the changes that are proposed sit on an iterative basis, because we will never achieve the perfect chamber. It is always going to be a journey—it will be a voyage—and it is for all members across the chamber to contribute to that by adding their ideas and opinions. I know that the committee and others across the chamber are always happy to debate proposals. I merely took the stance that I did with the previous intervention because I think that it lays an accusation for which there is no real evidence.

I take this moment to thank you, Presiding Officer—I hope not in any embarrassing way—for your substantial support, contribution and assistance with regard to this matter, which has been gratefully received by me and the committee.

The practical operation of the proposed proxy voting system will remain as set out in the Presiding Officer’s scheme. As detailed in the committee’s report, we gave consideration to some of the practical aspects of the scheme. I understand that the scheme has been finalised and, if it is endorsed by the chamber today, it will be able to be published on 22 December.

The only real difference between the temporary system that has been in operation and the permanent system that is being proposed is that we will set out in standing orders the grounds on which a proxy vote can be requested.

In the same item of business

The Presiding Officer (Alison Johnstone) NPA
The next item of business is a debate on motion S6M-11616, in the name of Martin Whitfield, on behalf of the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Co...
Martin Whitfield (South Scotland) (Lab) Lab
It has been an afternoon of the minutiae of law and standing orders, and of how places operate. This item is no less important than the stage 3 procedure tha...
John Mason (Glasgow Shettleston) (SNP) SNP
The member has listed reasons why people might not be here. Does he think that there is also a risk of the system being abused, as with the present online sy...
Martin Whitfield Lab
I am grateful for the intervention, but I do not feel that I can be in agreement even with the sub-statement about abuses of the online system. When members ...
Bob Doris (Glasgow Maryhill and Springburn) (SNP) SNP
I think that Mr Mason was making a distinction between proxy voting and remote voting, which are two distinct and different things. I support the committee’...
Martin Whitfield Lab
All the changes that are proposed sit on an iterative basis, because we will never achieve the perfect chamber. It is always going to be a journey—it will be...
Kate Forbes (Skye, Lochaber and Badenoch) (SNP) SNP
I thank the member for taking a third intervention. I am curious as to whether there is evidence on how we can protect members from sometimes being under pre...
Martin Whitfield Lab
The member raises a fascinating and interesting problem, which has, to some extent, been handled in both the evidence that we have had and discussions within...