Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
14
Parties on record
2,095,827
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,095,827 contributions in session S6, 11 May 2026 – 10 Jun 2026. Latest 30 days: 2,655. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 09 Jun 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament 17 May 2023

17 May 2023 · S6 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Complaint

I will deal with that matter, as it is specifically dealt with the in the committee’s unanimous report, which has been published and can be read by members in the chamber and people outside it who are watching and holding us to account.

We live in an age when there is a great deal of scepticism and mistrust of politicians. In order to challenge those perceptions, it is incumbent on us to act with integrity and to respect the rules in the code of conduct. It is also incumbent on us, in certain circumstances, to exclude a member from the proceedings of Parliament when that member has failed to comply with the requirement to declare an interest.

We fail ourselves and we undermine those founding principles if we do not uphold the requirements of our standards regime. For those reasons, I intend to write to all MSPs again next week, reminding them of the declaration requirements and encouraging them to seek advice from the clerks when they have any doubts about the correct approach to declarations.

With regard to the sanction that the committee has unanimously suggested, there are differences in this case. The committee is not required to follow a rule of precedent but deals with each case individually, fairly and following the rules of natural justice as it appears before us.

The committee’s unanimous decision is to recommend the exclusion of Maggie Chapman MSP from one meeting of the Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee, and it is, I believe, a proportionate one. The committee has taken its role seriously, seeking to embed the principles of natural justice and fairness in its deliberations. For the reputation of the Parliament and the members of it, I urge those in the chamber to support the motion.

I move,

That the Parliament notes the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee’s 10th Report, 2023 (Session 6), Complaint against Maggie Chapman MSP (SP Paper 366), and agrees to impose the sanction recommended in the report that Maggie Chapman MSP be excluded from the first meeting of the Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee that is held after this motion is agreed.

17:16  

In the same item of business

The Presiding Officer (Alison Johnstone) NPA
The next item of business is a debate on motion S6M-08946, in the name of Martin Whitfield, on the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee’s ...
Martin Whitfield (South Scotland) (Lab) Lab
As convener of the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee, I have the responsibility of lodging and speaking to motions seeking the Parliame...
Ross Greer (West Scotland) (Green) Green
I do not dispute that an inadvertent breach took place, but what Parliament is being asked to vote on is a sanction. I would appreciate it if the committee’s...
Martin Whitfield Lab
I will deal with that matter, as it is specifically dealt with the in the committee’s unanimous report, which has been published and can be read by members i...
Alexander Stewart (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Con) Con
As a member of the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee, I take the scrutiny and governance of Parliament and its members very seriously. ...
Rhoda Grant (Highlands and Islands) (Lab) Lab
We, as members of the Scottish Parliament, have the privilege of serving the people of Scotland. We must do that in their best interests and as transparently...
Christine Grahame (Midlothian South, Tweeddale and Lauderdale) (SNP) SNP
On a point of order, Presiding Officer. I seek your guidance on a general point. In my time in Parliament we have had several instances of standards recommen...
The Presiding Officer NPA
I thank Ms Grahame for her point of order. The convener addressed some of the points raised in Ms Grahame’s point of order, and pointed out that there is no ...
Mark Ruskell (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Green) Green
I thank members of the SPPA Committee and the Commissioner for Ethical Standards in Public Life in Scotland for their consideration of this case. As a form...
Martin Whitfield Lab
Will the member give way?
Mark Ruskell Green
I would like to make progress in laying out our concerns, but I will give way to the committee convener.
Martin Whitfield Lab
I am very grateful. As a point of clarification, does the member agree that the judgment of the individual member must always err on the side of being transp...
Mark Ruskell Green
Indeed—but I have laid out the circumstances in which the case emerged and I do not believe that an incorrect judgment was made in that regard. Many members ...
The Presiding Officer NPA
You must conclude, Mr Ruskell.
Mark Ruskell Green
We believe that those qualities are lacking in the recommendation today.
The Presiding Officer NPA
That concludes the debate on the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee’s 10th report in 2023, session 6.