Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
14
Parties on record
2,095,827
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,095,827 contributions in session S6, 11 May 2026 – 10 Jun 2026. Latest 30 days: 2,655. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 09 Jun 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Committee

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee 19 April 2023

19 Apr 2023 · S6 · Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Item of business
New Petitions
Monarchy (Legal Loopholes) (PE1998)
The first new petition is PE1998, on ending legal loopholes for the monarchy. The petition has been lodged by Tristan Gray on behalf of Our Republic and calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to legislate to abolish adaptations and exemptions to legislation requested by the monarchy; to ensure that all future communications between the monarch, the Scottish Government and the Scottish Parliament with representatives of the monarchy are fully transparent and public; to publish details of all cases where laws have been adapted at the request of the monarchy; and to prevent any such alterations to our laws from being implemented in the future. The Scottish Government’s response to the petition states that “seeking Crown consent is a requirement under the Scotland Act 1998” and that it is required “to follow the same rules that apply to UK Bills when it comes to seeking consent from the Royal Household.” I should also say, for the avoidance of doubt, that the 1998 act is outwith the responsibility of this Parliament. On the issue of sharing correspondence between the monarchy, the Scottish Government and the Scottish Parliament, the response notes the importance of confidentiality in order “to hold free and frank discussions”. The Scottish Government also states that it “does not record how Bills have changed as they have been developed or where stakeholders have queried aspects of that legislation” —at all, I would presume. Do members have any questions or suggestions in view of that directive response from the Scottish Government?

In the same item of business