Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
14
Parties on record
2,095,827
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,095,827 contributions in session S6, 11 May 2026 – 10 Jun 2026. Latest 30 days: 2,655. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 09 Jun 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament 11 January 2023

11 Jan 2023 · S6 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
National Planning Framework 4
Griffin, Mark Lab Central Scotland Watch on SPTV

NPF4 is a vitally important document—not for Parliament or Government, but for the communities, local decision makers and businesses that desperately need long-overdue detail about how planning will work for the next decade.

I echo the thanks for the considerable input from stakeholders—especially the communities most affected by the planning framework—that has got us to this point, as well as for the work of the committee clerks, the minister and officials.

Organisations such as the RSPB, Homes for Scotland, Heads of Planning Scotland and Scottish Renewables have welcomed the significant improvements since the first draft. The revised draft delivered necessary improvements to structure and readability, and to the clarity and consistency of policies and the flexibility around them. As we set out at committee, the original draft was not the greatest. The committee concluded that

“there are still elements of NPF4 that could be improved”,

that a cross-Government approach to implementation is still found wanting, and that a decimated planning profession lacks a pipeline to deliver on the ambition in the framework.

We have heard reports that one of our higher education institutes will be ending its undergraduate planning programme, which will leave only a single higher education institute in this country with a planning school. If that comes to pass, that will put even more pressure on the pipeline of planning professionals.

Our most fundamental concern is that the framework does not do enough to tackle Scotland’s housing crisis. The fact is that we need to build more homes, because our housing crisis has got worse since the previous framework, not better.

We need to build more homes that are warmer, safer and more accessible for an ageing, changing population in which people are living alone in greater numbers. That needs to be done while balancing the views of local people and protecting our natural and existing environment.

Homes must be built in greater numbers, because too few have been built for years now. Under the previous Government, an average of about 24,000 homes were built each year by both the private and social sectors. Despite the Government’s ambitious affordable housing supply programme, barely 18,000 new homes a year have been built since the previous framework was introduced.

In the same item of business

The Presiding Officer (Alison Johnstone) NPA
The next item of business is a debate on motion S6M-07442, in the name of Tom Arthur, on the fourth national planning framework. I would be grateful if membe...
The Minister for Public Finance, Planning and Community Wealth (Tom Arthur) SNP
I am delighted to open this afternoon’s debate on Scotland’s fourth national planning framework. We are in a somewhat novel situation, with Parliament having...
Richard Leonard (Central Scotland) (Lab) Lab
In light of the minister’s opening remarks, does he accept that there has been a substantial change between the first draft and the revised draft of the NPF ...
Tom Arthur SNP
I would, in the first instance, refer the member to the explanatory report that we published in November along with the revised draft of NPF4. It sets out in...
Fergus Ewing (Inverness and Nairn) (SNP) SNP
The NPF4 refers to the fact that the A9 and A96 will be improved for reasons of safety. However, one word is conspicuous by its absence from the text, namely...
Tom Arthur SNP
I am very grateful to Mr Ewing for the intervention. I am absolutely delighted to give him that commitment, on the record, here in Parliament.
Douglas Lumsden (North East Scotland) (Con) Con
Will the minister give way?
Tom Arthur SNP
Very briefly. I have a lot to get through.
Douglas Lumsden Con
Fergus Ewing mentioned the A96 between Inverness and Nairn. Can the minister commit that the A96 will be fully dualled between Inverness and Aberdeen?
Tom Arthur SNP
The commitments that the Government has made on dualling of the A9 and the A96 remain. Considerable work is being undertaken to ensure that we can deliver on...
Graham Simpson (Central Scotland) (Con) Con
Will the minister take an intervention?
Tom Arthur SNP
I am afraid that I do not have time, but I am happy to take an intervention when I conclude the debate. To support that important principle for new developm...
The Presiding Officer NPA
You must conclude, minister.
Tom Arthur SNP
That last aspect is crucial to a country such as Scotland, where we are blessed with a rich and abundant natural environment and landscape. We have assets th...
The Presiding Officer NPA
Thank you, minister. I must ask you to conclude at that point.
Tom Arthur SNP
In conclusion, the fourth national planning framework seeks to further our ambition for Scotland—
The Presiding Officer NPA
Minister, please conclude now.
Tom Arthur SNP
—to be a fairer, greener and more prosperous country by changing how people in Scotland will live in the future through planning.
The Presiding Officer NPA
Please conclude, minister.
Tom Arthur SNP
I am proud to move, That the Parliament gives its approval, as required by section 3CA(1) of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997, to the draft...
The Presiding Officer NPA
I call Ariane Burgess to speak on behalf of the Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee. 15:07
Ariane Burgess (Highlands and Islands) (Green) Green
Thank you, Presiding Officer, for giving me the opportunity to contribute to the debate, in my capacity as convener of the Local Government, Housing and Plan...
Miles Briggs (Lothian) (Con) Con
Without wanting this to sound like an Oscar awards speech, I start by thanking the clerks of the Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee for their h...
Fergus Ewing SNP
On the issue of housing, does the member agree that, although the content of NPF4 in respect of housing in rural Scotland is, to some extent, to be welcomed,...
Miles Briggs Con
I absolutely agree with that point. A key aspect that needs to be addressed is that, given the additional costs faced by small-scale builders, many of which ...
Tom Arthur SNP
I said in committee that I would meet stakeholders. I have met stakeholders, including a large organisation that has many drive-through premises, and I have ...
Miles Briggs Con
I very much welcome that. To avoid unintended consequences of any policy that the Parliament introduces, it is important that the guidance does not result in...
The Presiding Officer NPA
Please conclude, Mr Briggs.
Miles Briggs Con
Although I welcome much of what has been changed in NPF4, it is not acceptable in its current form, and therefore the Scottish Conservatives will not support...
Mark Griffin (Central Scotland) (Lab) Lab
NPF4 is a vitally important document—not for Parliament or Government, but for the communities, local decision makers and businesses that desperately need lo...