Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
14
Parties on record
2,095,827
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,095,827 contributions in session S6, 11 May 2026 – 10 Jun 2026. Latest 30 days: 2,655. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 09 Jun 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament 11 January 2023

11 Jan 2023 · S6 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
National Planning Framework 4

I very much welcome that. To avoid unintended consequences of any policy that the Parliament introduces, it is important that the guidance does not result in a potential slowdown in the economy or in job creation. None of us would want that to happen.

We also want there to be a better focus in the planning system on the delivery of community projects and infrastructure. In Edinburgh, I have been campaigning to take forward the development of an urban greenway along the old Powderhall site. From the outset, NPF4 should have provided an opportunity to make it easier for communities to pursue planning applications for such developments. That has not really happened, and I would like there to be more focus on that. The minister said that he is willing to consider having more consultation on how we can transform that situation and give communities the opportunity to present their own plans for the development of infrastructure. I do not think that that has been captured in NPF4. The minister has touched on the issue and I hope that there will be more focus on it in the future.

The Royal Town Planning Institute Scotland and Planning Democracy have made it clear that we can deliver proper planning only by having properly resourced local authorities. I welcome what the minister said about planning departments and the funding of planners. However, the sad fact is that many planning departments are underfunded and understaffed at present, and their budgets have been allowed to be cut over many years. We can see the consequences of that situation. That must change, and I welcome what the minister said about that.

I do not think that anyone believes that the passing of NPF4 today will signal the delivery of the planning system that Scotland needs to meet all the challenges that communities currently face. The delivery of the plan will be possible only through system change, as the convener outlined in her remarks. NPF4 should be a key document that influences the Scottish Government’s decision making across all portfolios—most importantly, perhaps, the health portfolio—and that serves as a core for future policy development in Scotland.

The devil will always be in the detail. I hope that the minister will now work to deliver the critical guidance that industry asks for and communities demand, and that we can see the flexibility that will ensure that any potentially needed changes and fixes are brought forward as soon as possible.

In the same item of business

The Presiding Officer (Alison Johnstone) NPA
The next item of business is a debate on motion S6M-07442, in the name of Tom Arthur, on the fourth national planning framework. I would be grateful if membe...
The Minister for Public Finance, Planning and Community Wealth (Tom Arthur) SNP
I am delighted to open this afternoon’s debate on Scotland’s fourth national planning framework. We are in a somewhat novel situation, with Parliament having...
Richard Leonard (Central Scotland) (Lab) Lab
In light of the minister’s opening remarks, does he accept that there has been a substantial change between the first draft and the revised draft of the NPF ...
Tom Arthur SNP
I would, in the first instance, refer the member to the explanatory report that we published in November along with the revised draft of NPF4. It sets out in...
Fergus Ewing (Inverness and Nairn) (SNP) SNP
The NPF4 refers to the fact that the A9 and A96 will be improved for reasons of safety. However, one word is conspicuous by its absence from the text, namely...
Tom Arthur SNP
I am very grateful to Mr Ewing for the intervention. I am absolutely delighted to give him that commitment, on the record, here in Parliament.
Douglas Lumsden (North East Scotland) (Con) Con
Will the minister give way?
Tom Arthur SNP
Very briefly. I have a lot to get through.
Douglas Lumsden Con
Fergus Ewing mentioned the A96 between Inverness and Nairn. Can the minister commit that the A96 will be fully dualled between Inverness and Aberdeen?
Tom Arthur SNP
The commitments that the Government has made on dualling of the A9 and the A96 remain. Considerable work is being undertaken to ensure that we can deliver on...
Graham Simpson (Central Scotland) (Con) Con
Will the minister take an intervention?
Tom Arthur SNP
I am afraid that I do not have time, but I am happy to take an intervention when I conclude the debate. To support that important principle for new developm...
The Presiding Officer NPA
You must conclude, minister.
Tom Arthur SNP
That last aspect is crucial to a country such as Scotland, where we are blessed with a rich and abundant natural environment and landscape. We have assets th...
The Presiding Officer NPA
Thank you, minister. I must ask you to conclude at that point.
Tom Arthur SNP
In conclusion, the fourth national planning framework seeks to further our ambition for Scotland—
The Presiding Officer NPA
Minister, please conclude now.
Tom Arthur SNP
—to be a fairer, greener and more prosperous country by changing how people in Scotland will live in the future through planning.
The Presiding Officer NPA
Please conclude, minister.
Tom Arthur SNP
I am proud to move, That the Parliament gives its approval, as required by section 3CA(1) of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997, to the draft...
The Presiding Officer NPA
I call Ariane Burgess to speak on behalf of the Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee. 15:07
Ariane Burgess (Highlands and Islands) (Green) Green
Thank you, Presiding Officer, for giving me the opportunity to contribute to the debate, in my capacity as convener of the Local Government, Housing and Plan...
Miles Briggs (Lothian) (Con) Con
Without wanting this to sound like an Oscar awards speech, I start by thanking the clerks of the Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee for their h...
Fergus Ewing SNP
On the issue of housing, does the member agree that, although the content of NPF4 in respect of housing in rural Scotland is, to some extent, to be welcomed,...
Miles Briggs Con
I absolutely agree with that point. A key aspect that needs to be addressed is that, given the additional costs faced by small-scale builders, many of which ...
Tom Arthur SNP
I said in committee that I would meet stakeholders. I have met stakeholders, including a large organisation that has many drive-through premises, and I have ...
Miles Briggs Con
I very much welcome that. To avoid unintended consequences of any policy that the Parliament introduces, it is important that the guidance does not result in...
The Presiding Officer NPA
Please conclude, Mr Briggs.
Miles Briggs Con
Although I welcome much of what has been changed in NPF4, it is not acceptable in its current form, and therefore the Scottish Conservatives will not support...
Mark Griffin (Central Scotland) (Lab) Lab
NPF4 is a vitally important document—not for Parliament or Government, but for the communities, local decision makers and businesses that desperately need lo...