Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
14
Parties on record
2,095,827
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,095,827 contributions in session S6, 11 May 2026 – 10 Jun 2026. Latest 30 days: 2,655. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 09 Jun 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid) 08 June 2022

08 Jun 2022 · S6 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Economic Priorities
Forbes, Kate SNP Skye, Lochaber and Badenoch Watch on SPTV

I have taken quite a few interventions and I am probably running low on time.

If we look across the whole four-year period of the resource spending review, our real-terms funding is to grow by only 2 per cent, after accounting for devolution of social security benefits. The current fiscal settlement denies us even the most modest borrowing powers that most Governments across the world would have access to—powers that Scotland would have as an independent state.

If we need another reason why Scotland cannot afford to remain under UK Tory rule, researchers at the Glasgow Centre for Population Health found that

“Austerity is highly likely to be the most substantial causal contributor to the stalled mortality rates seen in Scotland and across the UK.”

Scottish people deserve better than that, and they also deserve informed and intelligent debate about the true nature of our financial outlook.

It is therefore disappointing to see that the Conservatives have, once again, claimed that

“the Scottish Government has imposed higher tax rates on Scotland without increasing revenues”.

That is factually inaccurate. It is contradicted—[Interruption.]. It is contradicted by the Institute for Fiscal Studies, which stated last week:

“We are not saying the tax rises have reduced revenue. The tax rises almost certainly have raised revenue.”

In the SFC’s December 2021 forecast publication—to which, I think, Liz Smith referred—the SFC noted that the Scottish Government’s decisions on income tax since 2017-18 would add about £552 million to the Scottish budget in 2022-23.

In the past six months, we have set out our annual budget, our strategy for economic transformation, two medium-term financial strategies and a three-year resource spending review—all against the backdrop of a pandemic and the biggest economic shock in over 100 years, the most significant cost of living crisis in a generation and the illegal Russian invasion of Ukraine, which is a humanitarian crisis that is affecting the global economy.

There can be no accusation that this Government is shying away from its responsibilities in managing our public finances and Scotland’s economy. It is managing them well. Despite the funding pressures and despite macroeconomic powers remaining with the UK Government, our resource spending review prioritises our limited resources on the Scottish Government’s long-term ambitions for Scotland.

Other parties in the chamber might have different priorities, but I strongly believe that the priorities that we have set out as part of the resource spending review are the priorities of the people of Scotland: tackling child poverty, transitioning to net zero, economic recovery and helping households with the cost of living crisis. It is our job, as a mature and fiscally responsible Government, to deliver those priorities, but Parliament needs to face up to the realities of where powers lie and the realities of a budget that gets cut by the UK Government.

I move amendment S6M-04815.3, to leave out from “is deeply” to end, and insert:

“endorses the priorities set out in the Scottish Government’s spending review of tackling child poverty, addressing the climate crisis, building a stronger economy and improving public services, while supporting those people struggling with the increased cost of living; notes that the overall Scottish Budget has fallen by 5.2% in real terms between 2021-22 and 2022-23 and that the Scottish Fiscal Commission has confirmed a further 1% real-terms reduction until 2025-26; agrees that current financial fiscal arrangements between the UK Government and the Scottish Government are deeply flawed; highlights the persistent dismal failures of leadership in the UK Government, with the UK currently having the highest inflation rate of any G7 country, compounded by Brexit increasing food prices; notes recent research from the Glasgow Centre for Population Health highlighting the brutal reality of a decade of austerity under the UK Government, and believes that, with full control over the economic and financial powers, the Scottish Government could take further action to build the economy that Scotland deserves.”

15:22  
References in this contribution

Motions, questions or amendments mentioned by their reference code.

In the same item of business

The Deputy Presiding Officer (Annabelle Ewing) SNP
The next item of business is a debate on motion S6M-04815, in the name of Liz Smith, on economic priorities. 14:59
Liz Smith (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Con) Con
There are really two reasons behind the Scottish Conservatives’ request for this debate. First, the 30-minute statement last week, with less than an hour pri...
Stuart McMillan (Greenock and Inverclyde) (SNP) SNP
Yet again, the Conservative Party is talking about the ferries being a waste of money. Is Liz Smith saying to the population of Inverclyde and the workforce ...
Liz Smith Con
I cannot believe that question—the extent of the public money that is being wasted by this SNP Government is absolutely patently obvious. It is increasing we...
John Mason (Glasgow Shettleston) (SNP) SNP
Does the member accept that, through the different tax policies, we raised £240 million extra for 2018-19, which the latest figures are for? If we did not ha...
Liz Smith Con
Mr Mason sits on the same committee as I do, which has been scrutinising Government finances, and he will know exactly what the projections are about the dow...
The Cabinet Secretary for Finance and the Economy (Kate Forbes) SNP
The member just made a comment that is contradicted by David Phillips from the Institute for Fiscal Studies, who explicitly said that the “tax rises almost ...
Liz Smith Con
Of course, tax revenues are up in that sense, but they are not up to the extent that the Scottish Government requires for its spending. There is a huge diver...
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
Before calling the next speaker, I remind all members who wish to speak in the debate to ensure that they have pressed their request-to-speak button. I call ...
The Cabinet Secretary for Finance and the Economy (Kate Forbes) SNP
This debate is really about why and how Scotland cannot afford to remain under UK Tory rule. It is more than a little ironic that the Conservatives have ini...
Liz Smith Con
I am grateful to the cabinet secretary for taking my intervention. What does the cabinet secretary feel about the finance committee’s conclusion: “We consid...
Kate Forbes SNP
Which Government was responsible for faster gross domestic product growth in Scotland in March, when there was a fall in GDP across the rest of the UK? I wil...
Daniel Johnson (Edinburgh Southern) (Lab) Lab
I agree with much of what the cabinet secretary has said. The Conservatives are doing an absolutely appalling job of running the economy, but does that not m...
Kate Forbes SNP
I will come on to that, but I think that the context is important. I recently wrote to the Chancellor of the Exchequer with a comprehensive funding package...
Willie Rennie (North East Fife) (LD) LD
If the cabinet secretary is willing to take credit for those selective statistics, is she prepared to accept responsibility for Scotland’s overall economic p...
Kate Forbes SNP
The irony of that question is that, although we have set out our approach to economic growth over the next 10 years and have recognised the work that needs t...
Liz Smith Con
Will the cabinet secretary take an intervention?
Kate Forbes SNP
I have taken quite a few interventions and I am probably running low on time. If we look across the whole four-year period of the resource spending review, ...
Paul Sweeney (Glasgow) (Lab) Lab
It is a pleasure to open the debate on behalf of the Labour Party. I thank the Scottish Conservatives for lodging the motion. The debate is long overdue and ...
John Mason SNP
The member is very good at listing some of the problems that we face, but I do not think that anyone is arguing that those are not challenges. Can he give us...
Paul Sweeney Lab
Given the cost of living crisis, I am happy to accept the proposal for a superannuation. However, the key proposals are about efficiency of investments and ...
Alex Cole-Hamilton (Edinburgh Western) (LD) LD
I am pleased to rise to speak for the Liberal Democrats, and I am grateful to Liz Smith for securing the parliamentary time for it. When the finance secreta...
Daniel Johnson Lab
Does Alex Cole-Hamilton agree that transport disruption and chaos is a problem not just because of the disrupted journeys, but because it prevents people fro...
Alex Cole-Hamilton LD
I absolutely agree with Daniel Johnson. The £80 million in lost revenue that has been quoted is just the tip of the iceberg. It will represent a lost opportu...
Kate Forbes SNP
Does the member think that a £25 billion requirement to invest in the supply chain is selling it on the cheap?
Alex Cole-Hamilton LD
I am sorry, but that is a very weak area for the cabinet secretary to try to defend. Anybody who has ever been on eBay knows that, when they are selling some...
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
Mr Cole-Hamilton, you need to conclude. Thank you.
Alex Cole-Hamilton LD
I will conclude with this point, Presiding Officer. Instead, national health service staff, patients, islanders and hospitality businesses are all being take...
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
We move to the open debate. Speeches will be of six minutes. I call Douglas Lumsden, to be followed by Michelle Thomson. 15:36
Douglas Lumsden (North East Scotland) (Con) Con
It is good to be discussing this important topic, because we were unable to do so last week, as my colleague Liz Smith pointed out. The spending review high...