Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
14
Parties on record
2,095,827
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,095,827 contributions in session S6, 11 May 2026 – 10 Jun 2026. Latest 30 days: 2,655. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 09 Jun 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid) 08 June 2022

08 Jun 2022 · S6 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Economic Priorities
Smith, Liz Con Mid Scotland and Fife Watch on SPTV

Of course, tax revenues are up in that sense, but they are not up to the extent that the Scottish Government requires for its spending. There is a huge divergence. This morning, at the Scottish Fiscal Commission breakfast, a graph showed that to be patently obvious. That is a serious concern.

The context of that is set out by the Scottish Government’s approach to the north-east and the oil and gas sectors, which encompass a large number of well-paid and highly skilled workers whose tax contributions to the Scottish economy are extremely important. That has become a problem, because we know that the SNP wants to rip the heart out of those industries.

The tax revenue issues were set out in stark terms by the Finance and Public Administration Committee. I remind the cabinet secretary that its unanimous conclusion was:

“The Committee believes that the outlook for Scotland’s economic performance and the downward pressure on the Scottish Budget, requires greater emphasis on prevention and reform.”

The committee wanted the Scottish Government to streamline and make much more coherent its policy strategies. Paragraph 97 of its report said:

“We consider that evidence showing that Scotland is lagging behind almost all other areas of the rest of the UK in key indicators of economic performance is deeply worrying.”

I have mentioned two changes that we would like the Scottish Government to deliver. They are a return to parity on income tax rates, so that Scotland is not disadvantaged, and a finance bill that would enhance the scrutiny of public spending decisions. However, the crucial element in all this is policies to enhance economic growth, even if the SNP’s partners, the Greens, do not agree with that.

Our Scottish Future was absolutely blunt in its analysis last week. It said that

“Scotland’s long-term failure to increase its growth rates relative to the UK”

is

“the elephant in the room.”

Our Scottish Future told the Scottish Government to stop

“throwing good money after bad or non-productive”

projects, and it cited the illogical decision to cut spending on university research as one example. We agree with that, just as we agree that the Government should ensure that there is a much simpler and more easily understood pathway through the enterprise bodies and grants that it can award. Just about everybody in business wants that change as quickly as possible, because they are keen to get on with boosting innovation and productivity without red tape, form filling and complex planning and procurement processes getting in their way. It is essential for business to feel good about itself and its future if Scotland is to achieve the growth rates that we need.

In recent weeks, several key business leaders have said that the national economic transformation strategy and the Scottish National Investment Bank do not have anything like the clarity and rigour that we need to deliver growth. Businesses also want to see Scotland’s Governments working together—not embroiled in constant bickering and constitutional rivalry, which divert attention away from the important focus. That is another unanimous conclusion of the Finance and Public Administration Committee.

Scotland has immense talent in every corner of the country. We need to mobilise that talent in every way that we can, and we need policies that support that talent, incentivise investment and support our businesses and public services. We need a Scottish Government that is wholly committed to efficiency and transparency in public finances. We do not need one that is constantly peddling grudge and grievance at every turn and not looking after our finances properly.

I move,

That the Parliament is deeply concerned by many of the trends published within the recent analysis of the Scottish economy undertaken by the Scottish Fiscal Commission; is concerned, in particular, by the revised downward growth estimates and decline in real earnings, and that the Scottish Government has imposed higher tax rates on Scotland without increasing revenues, compared with the block grant adjustment, due to the ongoing issues relating to weaker productivity and inflexibilities within the Scottish labour market; is further concerned by the real-terms cuts of more than £1 billion announced by the Scottish Government, which will affect local government, the police and higher education, among key services; calls on the Scottish Government to commit to ensuring that no one in Scotland pays more income tax compared with people in the rest of the UK, when finances allow, ensuring that policies to deliver long-term growth, including collaborative projects with the UK Government such as city deals, are a priority within Scottish Government spending plans; calls for a finance bill mechanism to be introduced to evaluate the effectiveness of public spending, and further calls for plans for a second independence referendum to be taken off the table.

In the same item of business

The Deputy Presiding Officer (Annabelle Ewing) SNP
The next item of business is a debate on motion S6M-04815, in the name of Liz Smith, on economic priorities. 14:59
Liz Smith (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Con) Con
There are really two reasons behind the Scottish Conservatives’ request for this debate. First, the 30-minute statement last week, with less than an hour pri...
Stuart McMillan (Greenock and Inverclyde) (SNP) SNP
Yet again, the Conservative Party is talking about the ferries being a waste of money. Is Liz Smith saying to the population of Inverclyde and the workforce ...
Liz Smith Con
I cannot believe that question—the extent of the public money that is being wasted by this SNP Government is absolutely patently obvious. It is increasing we...
John Mason (Glasgow Shettleston) (SNP) SNP
Does the member accept that, through the different tax policies, we raised £240 million extra for 2018-19, which the latest figures are for? If we did not ha...
Liz Smith Con
Mr Mason sits on the same committee as I do, which has been scrutinising Government finances, and he will know exactly what the projections are about the dow...
The Cabinet Secretary for Finance and the Economy (Kate Forbes) SNP
The member just made a comment that is contradicted by David Phillips from the Institute for Fiscal Studies, who explicitly said that the “tax rises almost ...
Liz Smith Con
Of course, tax revenues are up in that sense, but they are not up to the extent that the Scottish Government requires for its spending. There is a huge diver...
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
Before calling the next speaker, I remind all members who wish to speak in the debate to ensure that they have pressed their request-to-speak button. I call ...
The Cabinet Secretary for Finance and the Economy (Kate Forbes) SNP
This debate is really about why and how Scotland cannot afford to remain under UK Tory rule. It is more than a little ironic that the Conservatives have ini...
Liz Smith Con
I am grateful to the cabinet secretary for taking my intervention. What does the cabinet secretary feel about the finance committee’s conclusion: “We consid...
Kate Forbes SNP
Which Government was responsible for faster gross domestic product growth in Scotland in March, when there was a fall in GDP across the rest of the UK? I wil...
Daniel Johnson (Edinburgh Southern) (Lab) Lab
I agree with much of what the cabinet secretary has said. The Conservatives are doing an absolutely appalling job of running the economy, but does that not m...
Kate Forbes SNP
I will come on to that, but I think that the context is important. I recently wrote to the Chancellor of the Exchequer with a comprehensive funding package...
Willie Rennie (North East Fife) (LD) LD
If the cabinet secretary is willing to take credit for those selective statistics, is she prepared to accept responsibility for Scotland’s overall economic p...
Kate Forbes SNP
The irony of that question is that, although we have set out our approach to economic growth over the next 10 years and have recognised the work that needs t...
Liz Smith Con
Will the cabinet secretary take an intervention?
Kate Forbes SNP
I have taken quite a few interventions and I am probably running low on time. If we look across the whole four-year period of the resource spending review, ...
Paul Sweeney (Glasgow) (Lab) Lab
It is a pleasure to open the debate on behalf of the Labour Party. I thank the Scottish Conservatives for lodging the motion. The debate is long overdue and ...
John Mason SNP
The member is very good at listing some of the problems that we face, but I do not think that anyone is arguing that those are not challenges. Can he give us...
Paul Sweeney Lab
Given the cost of living crisis, I am happy to accept the proposal for a superannuation. However, the key proposals are about efficiency of investments and ...
Alex Cole-Hamilton (Edinburgh Western) (LD) LD
I am pleased to rise to speak for the Liberal Democrats, and I am grateful to Liz Smith for securing the parliamentary time for it. When the finance secreta...
Daniel Johnson Lab
Does Alex Cole-Hamilton agree that transport disruption and chaos is a problem not just because of the disrupted journeys, but because it prevents people fro...
Alex Cole-Hamilton LD
I absolutely agree with Daniel Johnson. The £80 million in lost revenue that has been quoted is just the tip of the iceberg. It will represent a lost opportu...
Kate Forbes SNP
Does the member think that a £25 billion requirement to invest in the supply chain is selling it on the cheap?
Alex Cole-Hamilton LD
I am sorry, but that is a very weak area for the cabinet secretary to try to defend. Anybody who has ever been on eBay knows that, when they are selling some...
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
Mr Cole-Hamilton, you need to conclude. Thank you.
Alex Cole-Hamilton LD
I will conclude with this point, Presiding Officer. Instead, national health service staff, patients, islanders and hospitality businesses are all being take...
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
We move to the open debate. Speeches will be of six minutes. I call Douglas Lumsden, to be followed by Michelle Thomson. 15:36
Douglas Lumsden (North East Scotland) (Con) Con
It is good to be discussing this important topic, because we were unable to do so last week, as my colleague Liz Smith pointed out. The spending review high...